Wopu @Wopu@merovingian.club
Joined Jul 2022
@Truthy I'd watch women soccer if you have an all female team against an all trans women team.
It's not about peak performance. I just find absolute dominance entertaining. It's like grown men racing against midgets, of course I'd pay money to watch that shit.
Wopu
boosted
@qwerty So pretty much MGTOW but more extreme, more retarded, and they'll immediately stop the moment a bad boy makes them swoon.
Wopu
boosted
:gondola_head: 
:ignutius: 
:stargate:
Wopu
boosted
Unconditional submission to the cause is not good marketing, ladies.
Suck a man's dick once in a while and all of a sudden, the allies show up 
Wopu
boosted
I am absolutely loving every single screenshot where democrats ropeneck themselves over Trump's victory knowing troons are most definitely among those casualties
GIF
GIF
Wopu
boosted
Wopu
boosted
@Dan_Ramos They can't get out of their cage.
Wopu
boosted
Wopu
boosted
Wopu
boosted
>>my chosen jew
Jesus is not a "jew"
Calling Jesus a "jew" is not an historically accurate statement
The word "jew" didn't exist in the days of Jesus. It was invented many centuries later
'jew' does not mean Judean. They are separate words
It's like redefining the word "german" to mean "nazi" and then saying Martin Luther was a Nazi who supported Hitler because people called him a German which now means Nazi and it "makes sense" because Germans and Nazis have so much cultural overlap.
Total lunacy. Just like calling Jesus a "jew"
Peer review research paper from a .org university website:
https://scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-94222008000300008
>"The article demonstrates that this thesis is supported by Josephus and also by archaeological evidence. From the perspective of this thesis, the article contends that the term "Jew" does not apply to Galileans. First-century Galileans should rather be understood as "ethnic Judeans"
>>To reiterate: Galileans were not "Jews" who practiced a "religion" called "Judaism". When Jesus, the Galilean, was crucified as the "king of the Judeans" ; Mt 27:37; Mk 15:26; Lk 23:38; Jn 19:19), it was a profound and highly offensive statement against Judean ethnic identity.
Jesus was a Judean from Galilee thus it's historically wrong to label him the so called made up word "jew"
>you have 2 sides and both are jews
You're confusing your paid politics posting with paid religious posting
Very common with you idiot shills
>It wasn't this jew, it was that jew!
Jesus is not a "jew"
Calling Jesus a "jew" is not an historically accurate statement
The word "jew" didn't exist in the days of Jesus. It was invented many centuries later
'jew' does not mean Judean. They are separate words
It's like redefining the word "german" to mean "nazi" and then saying Martin Luther was a Nazi who supported Hitler because people called him a German which now means Nazi and it "makes sense" because Germans and Nazis have so much cultural overlap.
Total lunacy. Just like calling Jesus a "jew"
Peer review research paper from a .org university website:
https://scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-94222008000300008
>"The article demonstrates that this thesis is supported by Josephus and also by archaeological evidence. From the perspective of this thesis, the article contends that the term "Jew" does not apply to Galileans. First-century Galileans should rather be understood as "ethnic Judeans"
>>To reiterate: Galileans were not "Jews" who practiced a "religion" called "Judaism". When Jesus, the Galilean, was crucified as the "king of the Judeans" ; Mt 27:37; Mk 15:26; Lk 23:38; Jn 19:19), it was a profound and highly offensive statement against Judean ethnic identity.
Jesus was a Judean from Galilee thus it's historically wrong to label him the so called made up word "jew"
>you have 2 sides and both are jews
You're confusing your paid politics posting with paid religious posting
Very common with you idiot shills
>It wasn't this jew, it was that jew!
Joined Jul 2022
