>>my chosen jew
Jesus is not a "jew"
Calling Jesus a "jew" is not an historically accurate statement
The word "jew" didn't exist in the days of Jesus. It was invented many centuries later
'jew' does not mean Judean. They are separate words
It's like redefining the word "german" to mean "nazi" and then saying Martin Luther was a Nazi who supported Hitler because people called him a German which now means Nazi and it "makes sense" because Germans and Nazis have so much cultural overlap.
Total lunacy. Just like calling Jesus a "jew"
Peer review research paper from a .org university website:
https://scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-94222008000300008>"The article demonstrates that this thesis is supported by Josephus and also by archaeological evidence. From the perspective of this thesis, the article contends that the term "Jew" does not apply to Galileans. First-century Galileans should rather be understood as "ethnic Judeans"
>>To reiterate: Galileans were not "Jews" who practiced a "religion" called "Judaism". When Jesus, the Galilean, was crucified as the "king of the Judeans" ; Mt 27:37; Mk 15:26; Lk 23:38; Jn 19:19), it was a profound and highly offensive statement against Judean ethnic identity.
Jesus was a Judean from Galilee thus it's historically wrong to label him the so called made up word "jew"
>you have 2 sides and both are jews
You're confusing your paid politics posting with paid religious posting
Very common with you idiot shills
>It wasn't this jew, it was that jew!