Joined Dec 2022
@Zeb - Meth is also very common here...
@Zeb - American women tend to lie about their age. I always figured that was universal... but maybe not? 🤔
@Based_Accelerationist - In all seriousness... You should get ahold of your ego.
You insulted TFM's integrity, and it's not the first time, and I didn't let it go unanswered.
All the escalation, deflection, and re-framing... That was your response to a man testifying to the integrity TFM has shown over the course of years.
Being wrong happens to everyone sometimes.
You're wrong. I know that. You should accept that. I recommend watching the following:
@Based_Accelerationist - If disgust is an emotion, then call me emotional.
@Based_Accelerationist @TenaciousGoat -
I've said what I know. And I do know that much.
All of this is words on the Internet.
But I'll be direct if you like: Based accelerationist, you are either a lying piece of shit, or a fucking retard.
But hey, everyone here is human (unless you're a bot, I guess 💁🏻♂️😅). So we're all prone to being a little retarded at times. I suggest thinking it over, and figuring out a way to be less retarded.
That's called "growing up", and everyone should do that.
@TenaciousGoat @Based_Accelerationist - ➡️
But with that history, I also know that TFM is a monkey of integrity. And I know that anyone calling him a liar, or a grifter... is either a lying piece of shit, or they're a fucking retard. 💁🏻♂️
Of course, the Internet is full of lying pieces of shit, and fucking retards... so it's nothing to get worked up about. But I know that much to be true. 🍻
@TenaciousGoat @Based_Accelerationist ➡️
Now, I don't know if TFM listens to a guy like me. But I know it costs me nothing to be so stubbornly adamant. And it cost him a lot.
TFM is human, which means he can be misinformed, and he can be mistaken at times.
➡️
@TenaciousGoat @Based_Accelerationist ➡️
And everybody is human, including TFM. When channels that TFM used to be bigger than, started getting bigger, started becoming more relevant to the normie-sphere... TFM displayed a bit of doubt, and possibly regret for his previous unwillingness to compromise himself. But I said "look at the change that is happening. Look at the growing acknowledgement that female empowerment is the problem. That is the goal, and the reward." And he took that to heart. ➡️
@TenaciousGoat @Based_Accelerationist - ➡️
When Canada declared MGTOW a terrorist group... Everyone abandoned the label. I said "fuck that!"... and it cost me nothing. TFM also said "fuck that!", and it cost him a fair bit.
When the ad-pocalypse started, and everyone began self-censoring to stay on YouTube, I was on the side of "communicating ideas clearly is more important", and it cost me nothing. TFM was also on that side, and it cost his channel.
@TenaciousGoat @Based_Accelerationist - Food for thought:
As far as I can tell (tuning in and out since 2014-2015) TFM has the most integrity of any content creator that I've kept pace with.
I'm just some guy in the audience, with nothing to risk. So it's easy for me to criticize people who make income off the Internet. I can advocate for stunning levels of nearly autistic, self-defeating integrity, and it costs me nothing. No one making money online, listens to a guy like me... ➡️
TFM's stagflationary depression market forecast:
@atomic - If women are children (and they are), then at some point it will come down to "...because I said so." 💁🏻♂️
@Tfmonkey - Anticipated objection: shareholders are owners, and that's why the requirement for fiduciary responsibility exists.. 🤔 and it'd be a fair point.
But what if shareholders weren't owners? What if they bought rights to profit-sharing, contingent on profit being available, but without corporate control? ..or maybe limited corporate control.
In real estate, water rights, mineral rights, surface rights, etc, all exist on the same land. Maybe corporate ownership could be similarly split?
@Tfmonkey - Hoped for upside:
- Allows corporate MGMT to pursue long term vision, at the risk of short term profit.
- Allows corporations to prioritize (or simply comply with public zeitgeist) social trends - for example, instead of off-shoring in strict pursuit of profit, a company could hire domestic at the risk of some profit.
Possible downside:
- greater risk for investors. But maybe that's just part of the gamble?
What do you think? Am I far wrong in that it might broadly help culturally?
@Tfmonkey ➡️ Given all that... I was wondering about the legal requirement of "fiduciary responsibility" being a legal requirement for corporate board members (I think that's it. I'm kinda ignorant on corporate structure to be honest... which is why I'm curious to hear your opinion).
What if we eliminated that legal requirement that corporations must act in order to maximize profits? Like, what's the worst that could happen?
@Tfmonkey - Don't know if it was intentional, but I feel like my question was indirectly answered on air, via superchat. Excellent points were made about corruption being the unavoidable problem, the impermanence of any given system, and capitalism being the only option where freedom is the default.
I've had a thought in the time since. Looking for ways to tinker for improvement.. My gripes with the current system is shortsightedness, and corporate driven cultural destruction. ➡️
@nomebullyyou - The more I think of Judaism as matriarchy, the more it makes sense.
That's a female question.
@N_Y_SparkyOxCable - Tomatoes add a lot to a burger. They taste bright, and cheerful - like a mid sweet citrus.
The fact that I can taste them, and that no sandwich is complete without them, could be genetic... 🤔
I'm a quarter Italian. 🍻
Joined Dec 2022
