nowhere have I "claimed" an "innate deficiency" of intelligence in blacks. My position on this question is clearly spelled out in my most recent book: "The plain fact is that at present there exists no scientifically satisfactory explanation for the differences between the IQ distributions in the black and white populations. The only genuine consensus among well-informed scientists on this topic is that the cause of the difference remains an open question."
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_J

Racism lowers IQ. That's why only blacks are effected.

@Humpleupagus

I believe the largest cause of lower black IQ is kike propaganda directed at black people encouraging them to blame the white man and demand free stuff from White men instead of trying to succeed by actions other than blaming the White man. And not being told that it is the White looking kikes that keep them down when the White man is blamed

There might still be an IQ difference but the difference would be much less without such propaganda because they might try to study

@HarryNuggets @shortstories @Humpleupagus And like I’d tell the gab-holes:
>So what you’re saying is the only physical attribute NOT determined by genetics is IQ.
Also what I’d tell them:
>Guessing you’ve never bought a dog before.

@EvilSandmich @Humpleupagus @HarryNuggets

Most of the variation in physical attributes is caused by behaviors and environment with rare exceptions when people have certain genetic disorders

I am proposing the same for intelligence and physical attributes

No matter how much genetic potential someone has most will not be able to do a 5 minute per mile marathon without training

The primary cause of high intelligence is the choice to study not DNA

Rare exceptions are caused by genetic defects

But isn't "choosing to study" a result, not the cause of, IQ? If not, then my cat is ignorant by choice.
Follow

@Humpleupagus @EvilSandmich @HarryNuggets
If people tell someone there will be another Holocaust if someone reads David Duke then people might be afraid to read David Duke's book Jewish Supremacism & not study it due to social undue influence

Different social factors may influence whether or not two different people with the same DNA would choose to study something

There might be exceptions in a small percent of humans that are genetically unable to study but most people genetically can study

· · Web · 2 · 0 · 0

@Humpleupagus @EvilSandmich @HarryNuggets

Most humans can achieve much beyond what they currently do in terms of intelligence but choose to remain ignorant in response to social factors due to propaganda

You're confusing intelligence (IQ) with knowledge.

I guess by your standards, Aristotle was low IQ since he was wrong about much.

@Humpleupagus @EvilSandmich @HarryNuggets

An IQ test is just a knowledge test of the material on the IQ test where the IQ score is based on your results compared to the mean and standard deviation of other people the same age as you that took the same test

IQ test= pattern recognition... 🤷‍♂️

@JedDrudge @Humpleupagus @EvilSandmich @HarryNuggets

You can take an IQ test, then study the same type of test material, then retake it and get a higher score

Because studying can make a difference in your test score without changing your DNA

@Humpleupagus @shortstories @EvilSandmich @HarryNuggets interesting if you take into account consciousness. Many of those high IQ people claiming we are just computers probably lack a consciousness or they wouldn’t believe that. I believe many high IQ people are genetically programmed to solve problems like a robot would. Meanwhile many lower intelligent people have a consciousness. Of course high IQ people with a consciousness is the normal. Just saying many lack it too
cant discredit David Duke , but Henry laid it all out cold
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.