☦️ ⛽🧃
Partial timeline of what went wrong.
Women's rights should be turned back to ~1850
- no education
- coverture
- no voting
- no career
RE: https://spinster.xyz/objects/46dadbb3-77f5-4d0e-8f18-7d6e9969ba84
Women's rights should be turned back to ~1850
- no education
- coverture
- no voting
- no career
RE: https://spinster.xyz/objects/46dadbb3-77f5-4d0e-8f18-7d6e9969ba84
@Dubbub OK, so, not everything is bad. At this rate, by 2100, women might be back where they ought to be.
@Rasterman brother, when we win women will be back where they ought to be in an instant
@Rasterman @Dubbub @Momther Sometimes the theory of clean slate works better. Give me a clean slut and i will make a mother, give a clean slut to govt and she will become an office drone.
@Rasterman @Momther Female education in itself. For a good chunk of the 20th century there was no politics in school yet the same effect was observed. If you teach women skills for outside the home naturally they will not want to stay at home.
@Momther @Dubbub @Rasterman The issue is, why are we giving women education? What are they doing with it?
>Waste time money resources and space getting an education that could have been given to a man with legitimate curiosity and inventiveness
>Pretty much in every instance completely waste it because it was merely for status
>Inadvertently or not so much self-eject from the mating pool because hypergamy renders a "high status" woman forever alone because pretty much all other men are "beneath her".
>Have like one kid if lucky, often not even that
>"Don't have time" to raise it properly, soft limpdick husbandoid isn't capable of properly fulfilling the father role, the sole child grows up to also be a waste of reproductive potential, too neurotic to successfully pair bond
>Continue to exist consuming resources men go get, doing nothing of legitimate value
>Engage in one giant societal nagging to accrue more privilege and resources to yourself and the "sisterhood" ensuring men are even less capable of doing the shitty labor of keeping society functional and comfortable for everyone else
>Refuse to die young because of high status healthcare
>Consume consume consume
>Accrue accrue accrue
>Block block block
>Provide: Status - NOTHING
>Die, having done nothing legitimately useful for anyone except maybe increase the population of useless retarded Brown people because some over-credentialed bespectacled yenta says Brown good White bad
Thanks, highly educated "high value" women!
>Waste time money resources and space getting an education that could have been given to a man with legitimate curiosity and inventiveness
>Pretty much in every instance completely waste it because it was merely for status
>Inadvertently or not so much self-eject from the mating pool because hypergamy renders a "high status" woman forever alone because pretty much all other men are "beneath her".
>Have like one kid if lucky, often not even that
>"Don't have time" to raise it properly, soft limpdick husbandoid isn't capable of properly fulfilling the father role, the sole child grows up to also be a waste of reproductive potential, too neurotic to successfully pair bond
>Continue to exist consuming resources men go get, doing nothing of legitimate value
>Engage in one giant societal nagging to accrue more privilege and resources to yourself and the "sisterhood" ensuring men are even less capable of doing the shitty labor of keeping society functional and comfortable for everyone else
>Refuse to die young because of high status healthcare
>Consume consume consume
>Accrue accrue accrue
>Block block block
>Provide: Status - NOTHING
>Die, having done nothing legitimately useful for anyone except maybe increase the population of useless retarded Brown people because some over-credentialed bespectacled yenta says Brown good White bad
Thanks, highly educated "high value" women!
@WTFPurpleAlpaca @Dubbub @Momther >what is the benefit of giving women education that could go to a man
Such a simple question, but I hadn't considered it until now.
It does sound silly when you read it laid out like that. Kind of embarrassing that society is allowing this to go on.
Such a simple question, but I hadn't considered it until now.
It does sound silly when you read it laid out like that. Kind of embarrassing that society is allowing this to go on.
If even just one single country - in the entire world - manages to make this connection, then they will manage the birthrate necessary to raise an army to conquer every other country in the world.
And this isn't even something complex like how to build a nuclear weapon - which (by the way) was independently re-invented approximately 10 times because no country ever wants to share their most powerful secret...
So the whole idea of "them" never actually "connecting the dots" is just a bad joke.
And this isn't even something complex like how to build a nuclear weapon - which (by the way) was independently re-invented approximately 10 times because no country ever wants to share their most powerful secret...
So the whole idea of "them" never actually "connecting the dots" is just a bad joke.
@Momther @Dubbub @Rasterman they teach this everywhere afaik, it's one of the first things you learn when learning about human populations in environmental studies and adjacent.
@Momther @Dubbub @Rasterman >they just don't care
No, they do. That's why they encourage it.
Consider just the fucking credentialism genocide aspect.
>105 IQ man
>knows STEM isn't for him
>gets a trade
>makes six figures
>105 IQ woman
>gets a bachelor's in interpretive twerking
>struggled to get job as a barista
>won't date the six figures tradie because he hasn't got a degree
Do you know those irl donation grifters? Like, they hassle you at a train station or in a mall to sign up to have an ongoing donation to unicef or shit like that?
I remember around 20 years ago I got approached by one of those. The cause was to give money explicitly to women in Africa.
They said this stuff out loud. It was part of the pitch:
>If we give money to those women and empower them to run their own life, get educated etc.
>They won't have so many kids.
No, they do. That's why they encourage it.
Consider just the fucking credentialism genocide aspect.
>105 IQ man
>knows STEM isn't for him
>gets a trade
>makes six figures
>105 IQ woman
>gets a bachelor's in interpretive twerking
>struggled to get job as a barista
>won't date the six figures tradie because he hasn't got a degree
Do you know those irl donation grifters? Like, they hassle you at a train station or in a mall to sign up to have an ongoing donation to unicef or shit like that?
I remember around 20 years ago I got approached by one of those. The cause was to give money explicitly to women in Africa.
They said this stuff out loud. It was part of the pitch:
>If we give money to those women and empower them to run their own life, get educated etc.
>They won't have so many kids.
@C_J_S @Momther @Dubbub @Rasterman it doesn't work, Africans are ironically too retarded even for the retarded but credentialized woman effect. All we've done for decades is feed a totally unnatural and ultimately unsustainable population boom.
Probably all part of the Kalergi plan. Over-educate Western women, they stop having kids while working their useful life away trying to increase Africa's population further, whether they realize it or not.
Probably all part of the Kalergi plan. Over-educate Western women, they stop having kids while working their useful life away trying to increase Africa's population further, whether they realize it or not.
@Dubbub @Rasterman