Follow
The truth about women
Women are solipsistic in their nature.
Solipsistic relates to solipsism.
Solipsism is the philosophical idea that only one's mind is sure to exist. As an epistemological position, solipsism holds that knowledge of anything outside one's own mind is unsure; the external world and other minds cannot be known and might not exist outside the mind.
Women are also biologically weaker than men. Women also raise children not for the family, but for themselves.
@TenaciousGoat "Solipsism is just a form of selfishness" is a Reddit-fueled idiot misunderstanding of solipsism. The philosophy you are looking for is Egoism.
@p @TenaciousGoat Ethical egoism as defined by Stirner? There is only one work covering that philosophy. Soliphism is the spastic view that everything is subjective and therefor there is nothing universal. Easily defeated by any transcendental argument.
@maxmustermann @TenaciousGoat
> Ethical egoism as defined by Stirner? There is only one work covering that philosophy.
There is only one work covering the topic of the one work, yes, but Egoism is a little broader than that. Ayn Rand is classified as an Egoist and she's on the other tip of the horseshoe from
.
> Ethical egoism as defined by Stirner? There is only one work covering that philosophy.
There is only one work covering the topic of the one work, yes, but Egoism is a little broader than that. Ayn Rand is classified as an Egoist and she's on the other tip of the horseshoe from
.
@p @TenaciousGoat Objectivism is hardly egoist. Their argument for selfishness is cuz its rational and logical. Stirner on the other hand argues that you should be selfish, because everyone, even God himself, is and you should be moral for selfish reasons.
@p @TenaciousGoat Objectivism is one gigantic spergery about the ethical argument against communism that goes a little like this: The amount of evil necessary to make everyone equal makes Communism untenable.
Objectivism may have the argument of history but fell apart, because Rand's sexual experiment based on hypergamy almost destroyed the movement. Nowadays, there is no serious attempt at Objectivism outside of Bioshock and extremely online crank gaggles. Better let it rest forever.
Objectivism may have the argument of history but fell apart, because Rand's sexual experiment based on hypergamy almost destroyed the movement. Nowadays, there is no serious attempt at Objectivism outside of Bioshock and extremely online crank gaggles. Better let it rest forever.
@maxmustermann @TenaciousGoat
> Objectivism is one gigantic spergery about the ethical argument against communism that goes a little like this: The amount of evil necessary to make everyone equal makes Communism untenable.
Objectivism holds that altruism is evil. You're describing Harrison Bergeron, not The Little Train that Shrugged.
> Objectivism may have the argument of history but fell apart,
I don't really care if it's tenable because I'm not an adherent. But it's generally classified as a form of egoism, because it is. Not being a communist myself, I do not have a particular attachment to terminology; it's useless to argue classifications.
> Objectivism is one gigantic spergery about the ethical argument against communism that goes a little like this: The amount of evil necessary to make everyone equal makes Communism untenable.
Objectivism holds that altruism is evil. You're describing Harrison Bergeron, not The Little Train that Shrugged.
> Objectivism may have the argument of history but fell apart,
I don't really care if it's tenable because I'm not an adherent. But it's generally classified as a form of egoism, because it is. Not being a communist myself, I do not have a particular attachment to terminology; it's useless to argue classifications.
@maxmustermann @TenaciousGoat
> Stirner on the other hand
Egoism is a classification; if the classification is "like Stirner" then, as I said, Rand isn't in that category. A definition like "primacy of the self and self-interest" fits both Stirner and Rand.
Webster's 1913: "Defn: The doctrine of certain extreme adherents or disciples of Descartes and Johann Gottlieb Fichte, which finds all the elements of knowledge in the ego and the relations which it implies or provides for."
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/egoism : "2. (ethics) The belief that moral behavior should be directed toward one's self-interest only."
In any case, it is a better fit than "solipsism" for the thing the guy's trying to get across.
> Stirner on the other hand
Egoism is a classification; if the classification is "like Stirner" then, as I said, Rand isn't in that category. A definition like "primacy of the self and self-interest" fits both Stirner and Rand.
Webster's 1913: "Defn: The doctrine of certain extreme adherents or disciples of Descartes and Johann Gottlieb Fichte, which finds all the elements of knowledge in the ego and the relations which it implies or provides for."
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/egoism : "2. (ethics) The belief that moral behavior should be directed toward one's self-interest only."
In any case, it is a better fit than "solipsism" for the thing the guy's trying to get across.
@TenaciousGoat Women are best fit for my cock.
@TenaciousGoat
Most humans are solipsistic
We call it "narcissism" in public to avoid pointing out that they are effectively insane.
In nature they would be prey for sabre-tooth tigers.