>Do you know the reason why women aren't drafted? It's not because they're weaker. It's because women gestate children. So because women gestate children and carry on the future, they are ENTITLED to protection. But what if women don't gestate children? What if women, hypothetically, claimed that they're not SUPPOSED to gestate children? Are men then inclined to protect them at the risk of their own lives? I don't think any man alive is not willing to fight, kill, and die to protect their pregnant wife, or the mother of their child. But that is the world you people have created. A world so balkanized that a man is only willing to protect whoever is 1 degree of separation from himself at most.

Let's say this man fights off this nog. She thanks him and moved on. Then what? What is the gratitude this man receives? You know what, even indirectly. Will this woman be an upstanding, pure, feminine, submissive woman and find a man amongst his "tribe"? Or will she do whatever she fancies?

Based.