The Sexual Revolution has Failed.
(offset time avoids introduction)
@jeremiah
Exactly. Which is why I say it's still happening. It start with dna technology (who for the first time EVER a man can be sure the kid is his) and then the birth control pill (which allow women to control pregnancy at will).
If you told any of this to anyone before 1940, they would have said it was impossible retard dream shit since the dawn of time, nobody was ever able to do it and that's how thing were.
Yet...here we are.
Our world even has an abortion pill and ultrasound!
I sincerely doubt it will ever be successful; even if you can bake a baby in a machine, it doesn't mean it will be healthy, effective, or well-adjusted.
The things you mentioned are about control: the ultrasound tells you you've got a tard or not the desired gender so you should abort, in a minority of cases it might save the kid's life by way of preventing an abortion or being ready to deal with a difficulty early.
The abortion pill is hardly an achievement, we had sylphium before Rome was established, and in the book of enoch, one of the gifts of the fallen angels was the knowledge of "smiting the fetus in the womb."
@jeremiah
Great! You get it. It's a revolution about control and power. My first point was about transferring all the power of reproduction and sex to men.
We have developed through history a good compromise between men and women (patriarchy, nuclear family, male authority) but that solution is very dead: it has been shot, sliced, burned and disintegrated).
Regarding healthy, effect and well-adjusted babies, isn't having good dna and loving father better than our current dysgenic system?
@jeremiah
The truth is both solutions are not exclusive. Although we live in an advanced modern world where most of your technology is essentially magic to humans even from decades ago and socially is a demonic feminist hellscape, the AMISH still exist. They don't even use electricity, have fertility of 7 and have patriarchy. The same with orthodox jews: they don't even work.
There are several solution happening at the same time and they will have to learn to co-exist, despite unequal results.
I further suspect "machine grown" children would suffer inferior health and development; it takes a tremendous amount of hubris on the part of whatever transhumanist retard suggesting that a machine is capable of reproducing all the features of the reproductive process, not to mention the epigenetic consequences and the effects of a redefined parenthood... one only has to look at lifelong orphans to see the effects of a lack of family and familial connections.