@petra @Bernard @cjd
From a surface analysis, I see two, maybe 3 net tax payers that adds more to society than they take away from it.
I would assume those net tax payers benefit from keeping Canada together because it's either beneficial to their business or are gov contractors, so that's why they're there.

The rest are takers who are simply afraid their welfare and government benefits will be cut, plus a few useless eaters.

Now, how do the separatists look like? Are they more capable?

@petra @Bernard @cjd
Then the government is doing exactly what I would do in their place:
Fear monger on tv, crackdown on anyone with ideas in the cities, ignore the young heritage male canadians but don't antagonize them, not really.
As long as their lifes are not inconvenienced enough, they won't do anything.

Which is ironic, if the leeches turn violent and attack the white rural men, they will cause their own downfall. The gov has to keep them on a tight leash.

Very interesting. I hadn't considered that perspective but I can see the vision.
I don't know if it's accidental or on purpose, but it would favorably both for the gov were they would have their slave cities as well as for the rural men who could reasonably insulate themselves from the faggotry.

It's too risky though. I wouldn't bet on it. Thinking about what could they do to tip the scales will be a good exercise.

You're right, but most people coping and hoping for an external savior that will never come is not feasible.

There's no way to make everybody happy. Eventually men will have to ignore everyone's feeling and work on (re)building a society that works, grows and is able to solve difficult problems by itself.

It's quite hard to know how the new social contract will be since we aren't sure who will survive the purge, but resilience and courage will become mandatory by default. Pain will ensure it.