But there is a large push back from some within Alberta and Canadians in general against this ever happening. Loss of resources, loss of face, issues with the feather indians. Just the very idea of Canada breaking up.
Here's an article and image from a recent "Forever Canada" event in Alberta arguing against breakup.
Just look at the people there and their faces. Just look at them. JFC.
https://www.westernstandard.news/opinion/macleod-the-f...
@petra @Bernard @cjd
From a surface analysis, I see two, maybe 3 net tax payers that adds more to society than they take away from it.
I would assume those net tax payers benefit from keeping Canada together because it's either beneficial to their business or are gov contractors, so that's why they're there.
The rest are takers who are simply afraid their welfare and government benefits will be cut, plus a few useless eaters.
Now, how do the separatists look like? Are they more capable?
@petra @Bernard @cjd
Then the government is doing exactly what I would do in their place:
Fear monger on tv, crackdown on anyone with ideas in the cities, ignore the young heritage male canadians but don't antagonize them, not really.
As long as their lifes are not inconvenienced enough, they won't do anything.
Which is ironic, if the leeches turn violent and attack the white rural men, they will cause their own downfall. The gov has to keep them on a tight leash.
Very interesting. I hadn't considered that perspective but I can see the vision.
I don't know if it's accidental or on purpose, but it would favorably both for the gov were they would have their slave cities as well as for the rural men who could reasonably insulate themselves from the faggotry.
It's too risky though. I wouldn't bet on it. Thinking about what could they do to tip the scales will be a good exercise.
It's what you would expect.