@Shadowman311 Honestly it's probably just depleted uranium being detected since they're testing for all radiation types and not just gamma radiation (the main radiation after nuclear fission)
@weaf @Shadowman311 the explosion does look similiar to a Russian missile strike on a stockpile of depleted uranium tank shells in Ukraine a while back.
If it was an actual nuke that shitty phone camera would be fried and the dude filming it would be blind from directly looking at it. Isreal has attacked syrian nuclear energy in the past. This wasnt a nuke.

@transgrammaractivist @Terry @Shadowman311 @weaf I don’t even believe in nukes as described; though it’s obvious this ain’t it.

Theyre very real and anyone telling you they arent is probably a retard.
@transgrammaractivist @Shadowman311 @Terry @weaf I honestly don’t know whether or not they are real, as described. It seems to me the technology required to perform the necessary critical-mass impact event is relatively simplistic by today’s standards, such that the likes of instant-pot tier electronics should put them well within reach of anyone capable of amassing sufficient fissible material.
I don’t deny the possibility; I just have my doubts.
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @transgrammaractivist @Shadowman311 @weaf just found the video. This is what 500 million dollars worth of DU shells going boom all at once looks like. It's from May 2023 in Khmelnitsky, Ukraine.

@Terry @Shadowman311 @transgrammaractivist @weaf Considering the stakes, I don’t understand why anyone takes the Nukes Narrative at face value.

@transgrammaractivist @Shadowman311 @Terry @weaf Essentially, everything available to the general public regarding nuclear power / weapons. It simply occurs to me over time that I cannot verify the veracity of any of that, beyond taking some “respected authority’s” word for it. The longer it drones on, the less likely it seems to me.

Yea that is legit retarded. The nuclear industry is too big an involves so many different interest groups that itd be impossible to lie about. That just silly tbh. Unless you really think china america russia isreal iran and all of europe got together and agreed to this silly conspiracy and then got the millions of people involved in the nuclear industry to also lie about it.
@transgrammaractivist @Shadowman311 @Terry @weaf Who am I to verify any of that ? Is it really that big a deal that I remain skeptical of the public narrative around nuclear energy ? really, who fucking cares what I think ? I’m literally just some guy on the internet. But I’m not going to lie to you by affirming things that I sincerely doubt.
I mean are you really honestly saying russia, china, the US, europe and swathes of the middle east all got together and agreed to lie about this for shits and gigs? And then stage things like chernobyl where people are still working to this day just to fool you? An american peasant with zero say? You dont think that sounds dumb and that theyre actually just telling the truth that yes they have big powerful nuclear bombs?

@transgrammaractivist @Shadowman311 @Terry @weaf They wouldn’t all have to agree to that. That’s not really the way any of this works.

Yes they literally would. If all these countries knew nukes werent real theyd just come out and say it. Countries like russia clearly make decisions based on their reality
@transgrammaractivist @Shadowman311 @Terry @weaf I think we’re talking past each other.
I’m aware of these basic facts, and have taken them into consideration. Nevertheless, the last time alleged nuclear weapons were used against civilian targets, was Hiroshima/Nagasaki in 1945. The longer the span of time between then and now, without a comparable incident, the less likely the official explanations seem. You and many others argue that’s perfectly well explained by the logistical realities surrounding the production of fissible material. I simply have my doubts that the public is being accurately informed about this. And it’s one small step from there, to doubting that we’re being accurately informed about the nature of said weapons themselves. These doubts are not borne of ignorance about the subject matter itself; but rather an acute awareness that I live on a tiny island of certainty, surrounded by vast oceans of the Unknown. I can talk even more at length about any of these points, but I already use enough words as it is.
Youre not on an island of certainty youre on island of delusion.
@transgrammaractivist @Shadowman311 @Terry @weaf Is it delusion ? While I don’t doubt I have some at least, I’m well open to correction and clarification regarding specifics. I’ve neither confirmed nor denied the objective existence of nuclear weapons as described; simply voiced the reasoned doubt that we’re being accurately informed about their nature. Sufficient is my doubt that I can truly say I don’t just simply believe in nukes. I can imagine plenty of possible shell-game / sleight of hand tactics that could explain the available data - but obviously those all exist in the Ocean of the Unknown, only In Potentia.
Follow

@KingOfWhiteAmerica @transgrammaractivist @Shadowman311 @Terry @weaf On some of the exercises I was on in the military, we operate at least up to the Lt Gen(3 star) level as if nukes are real and both ourselves and our adversaries have them, for whatever that's worth. Seems like a lot of effort to maintain an illusion.

I have also heard that nukes 'expire' where the core halves need to be re-enriched every decade or so, but have no idea if that's true or not.

· · Web · 0 · 0 · 2
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.