>women are property. Once you make peace that they are incapable of fair, reasonable or sensible behavior that even a basic negro man can showcase SOME of the time, it all becomes easier to handle. Women who appear to behave with reason are going to lose their marbles when you least expect them to, and in fact are internally as nonsensical as all others or more. The difference being that a HONEST women is a crazy bitch 100% of the time, and a sneaky liar will pretend to be cool and not give you any shit as long as she can get her way behind your back.
The only thing that makes civilization a good thing is when women get no say in it whatsoever. Our ancestors didn't warn us harshly enough about this only because making women equal was absolutely unthinkable in the past, if not as a sick joke or legal/societal expedient (like matrilineal inheritance)
KEK.
Property has value though.
The only thing that makes civilization a good thing is when women get no say in it whatsoever. Our ancestors didn't warn us harshly enough about this only because making women equal was absolutely unthinkable in the past, if not as a sick joke or legal/societal expedient (like matrilineal inheritance)
KEK.
Property has value though.
@shinichihaku Yeah, women are a depreciating asset. The older they get, the worse they offer.
Can they even be called an asset anymore? That term suggests 1: A benefit exists. 2: A net benefit exists.
2 definitely isn't true, 1 isn't true unless you really reach.
Like some tradcuck was joining in the pajeet spam by claiming the guy wasting time with a roastie instead of coding is winning. Except that coding lets you invent women.
2 definitely isn't true, 1 isn't true unless you really reach.
Like some tradcuck was joining in the pajeet spam by claiming the guy wasting time with a roastie instead of coding is winning. Except that coding lets you invent women.
Follow
@shinichihaku No, I agree modern women are a depreciating liability then.
