TenaciousWolf @[email protected]

:tuckerwat:

#minds

https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1856117221202337792

https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1856116634347905024

I am Amolek

💶💴💸💵💰🤑
The man who predicted the date of the war with Iran and won a huge sum - is betting again on an attack, the date - January 31

@Ghislaine >we're nonviolent
>assaults

The year is 2026 and possibly the first nigger in the history of the world to understand complying with police instructions has arisen.

I repeat we have a NIGGER WEARING A WOLF PELT UNDERSTANDING COMPLIANCE WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT. We have a code red situation, someone call Yakub

https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1856109047787298816

Philosophical chick.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/R59V1tV3pf8

BREAKING:
LOYALTY TEST INITIATED:
One Congresswoman Just Pulled the Pin on a Political Grenade That Could WIPE OUT Dozens in DC.💥

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) didn’t just make a statement — she launched a war.

Standing before the House, she demanded what no one in Washington wanted to hear:

A total ban on dual citizens serving in Congress.

No exceptions. No gray areas. One passport. One country. One allegiance.

“If you hold foreign citizenship,” Luna declared,
“You don’t belong in American power.”

The fallout? Immediate. Staffers are whispering. Lawyers are scrambling.

And behind the scenes, insiders say a list of dual-national lawmakers is already circulating — and it’s longer than anyone expected.

This isn’t about paperwork. It’s about influence. Foreign money. Divided loyalties. Now, Capitol Hill is holding its breath:
Which powerful names are at risk of disqualification?
Which foreign governments are quietly panicking?
And how long before classified briefings start leaking?

Supporters say Luna’s plan is a long-overdue firewall to protect U.S. sovereignty. Critics claim it’s a purge in disguise.

Public schools are arguably the best example of the economic calculation problem when you really think about it.

They can't determine which subjects are more needed than others in their areas due to the supply and demand requirements changing constantly, which is probably why they focus on dictating a wide range of subjects as graduation requirements, even if those aren't necessary for the career paths that kids may choose to go through. Yes, it may not hurt to know other subjects such as electives, but there's a difference between having a backup plan and filler.

What are your thoughts?
https://npub1l7a3c46glyl7fpmgkjfmgytmdfrhdh3552h83hanw0lg09z3q4sqzgdtjt.blossom.band/c7ae4364fd7ec2bbc079dbbfc6d9ee60277222c99ae9143daab99022772efb35.mp4
#Agorism #Agorist #AnCap #Libertarian #Antistate #FreeMarket #FreeTrade #Competition #Innovation #Entrepreneurship #CounterEconomics #Homeschooling #Unschooling #Microschool #Montessori #Worldschool #Waldorf #PrivateSchool #Video #Videostr

https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1856108558511759360