In an interview with the Columbia Journalism Review, Tucker Carlson announced that he plans to help build a new third political party. He says he doesn't want to run for office himself, but wants to help create an alternative to what he calls a one-party political establishment.
@Twig Won’t work, waste of energy. Just take away women’s right to vote.
Wowza…, any other suggestions?
They literally have two coat rooms and two lunch rooms in the Capitol building.
They have kept it a two party system by design.
And it's a Uniparty at the end of the day.
My understanding is that Tucker meant building a new party that's open to people from different political backgrounds, Republicans, Democrats, independents, and anyone who shares its core goals.
I haven't watched the full interview yet, so that's just my impression, but it seems like he's aiming for an America First coalition rather than simply creating another truckload of party.
@Twig He’ll be assassinated if it gains any real traction.
Really…., do you think he will survive in the endgame?
@Twig Sounds like he’s controlled opposition.
Big Controlled Opposition…
Could you dare to name the ones who might join him knowingly and unknowingly…..?
@Twig Name? Not really, but it feels similar to Nick Fuentes’s followers. I mean the baby boomers sold the US out because they saw this country as an economic zone and not a nation with a culture and people. Can I blame them for their own self interest or do I blame the generation before them whose policies lead to this outcome. The outcome of giving women who are not equal to men but have an important role in society political power a huge mistake.
Now equality is destroying the strong
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @TenaciousWolf @Twig
They tried the Save the Republic party. No one really cared.
@MSP_SMIMSA @TenaciousWolf @Twig Yeah I think a lot of people are now savvy to the fact “the Republic” isn’t going save anything. Something like the “Repeal the Nineteenth Party” would probably get some legs, because it’s at least an honest acknowledgement that we’re putting “democracy” behind us 
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @TenaciousWolf @MSP_SMIMSA
The nineteenth amendment, the girls’ party?
Name those girls…
@Twig @TenaciousWolf @MSP_SMIMSA I mean, I think they’re already called “the Women” 
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @TenaciousWolf @MSP_SMIMSA
Biological women?
@Twig @TenaciousWolf @MSP_SMIMSA Yep; that’s clearly who the “Repeal the Nineteenth Party” are concerned with disenfranchizing.
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @TenaciousWolf @MSP_SMIMSA
There are plenty of wacko men across every political affiliation too.
How does removing women suddenly solve anything?
@Twig @TenaciousWolf @MSP_SMIMSA Women shouldn’t vote; women aren’t the ones that face the brunt of the consequences of their horrible political decisions. Men are.
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @TenaciousWolf @MSP_SMIMSA
If that's the standard, then plenty of men shouldn't vote either. You're really cooking up something wild there.
And where are these men who are supposedly taking care of all the consequences? A lot of those consequences are still ongoing. When are they going to solve them, and how?
@Twig @TenaciousWolf @MSP_SMIMSA Well are you suggesting we send women to the front lines alongside the men ? What is “voting”, if not a proxy for and in lieu of war ? Draft the girls, you say ? Haha
Honestly though, only landowning men were originally given voting rights - as only they had an actual stake in the National Destiny.
But even more honestly, why are we voting in the first place ? Why not just have a ruler who holds the ultimate stake, for the Destiny of the whole Nation ? At least then he might be able to do something, not hidebound by a bunch of bickerers.
I care not for voting, but Destiny 🤣
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @TenaciousWolf @MSP_SMIMSA
Your head seems stuck in an ancient-history pothole.
Not every king led from the front.
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @TenaciousWolf @MSP_SMIMSA
Here's Glenn's argument: if you're not a taxpayer, you shouldn't vote.
@Twig @KingOfWhiteAmerica @TenaciousWolf
I agree with both of you.
If you receive government benefits or work for the government and can vote for your own raises and benefits, you should not be allowed to vote.
Male or female.
I mean aid in the form of welfare or subsidies.
What happened to Nick's followers?
And what do the Baby Boomers have to do with this? Just collecting their Social Security checks?
Also, where does this idea come from that girls are "weakening" society? What exactly do you mean by "weakening"?
You seem to be drawing a very broad conclusion, that girls are somehow destroying the country. Can you be specific?
@Twig Judging by this thread you’re not here for an intellectual debate so I won’t be answering further questions.
Interesting.
You said:
"He'll be assassinated if it gains any real traction."
"Sounds like he's controlled opposition."
"The baby boomers sold the US out..."
"Giving women... political power [was] a huge mistake."
"Now equality is destroying the strong."
That’s not an argument though, it’s just a bunch of big claims thrown together.
I asked for clarification on what you meant, but you didn’t actually answer any of it and just wrote me off like a janitor mopping a 🚽 floor.
@TenaciousWolf @Twig If by “political party” he means “private army with ten thousand stealth assassins” it could be interesting