Stolen post but I like it.
My main problem with Plato and Confucius as far as politics go, they seem to have forgotten how the order they lived in was established in the first place.
King Wu(martial) of Zhou didn't conquer his opposition by pontificating on proper court decorum or what music is to be played when. You do that after establishing authority. If the sages like Confucius had the way of it they'd have ruled the world long ago.
Plato wanted to make an unassailable political system that would preferably be modified little if ever.
There will always be parties with an interest in changing the system. The system itself produces them, or brings them in, to cover its blind spots.
I find it strange that Plato and Confucius are pragmatic when it comes to religion (ritual should be engineered to control the masses) yet idealistic, even magical, when it comes to political thought. It's the exact reverse of reality.
@ubernigga That's factually true. If you kill all the people who ask why, eventually no one alive will question anything.
@ubernigga Just like with communism, it doesn't matter how many times it fails, this will never stop them from trying.
@Zeb It hasn't worked once in human history yet.