Show newer
doggel boosted
doggel boosted

@thor Almost forgot, nowadays, every single model out there is a merge of some damaged model, if you want to get something good and update, you may have to do weighted u-net layer merging of older models with new models and pray that it comes all right or at the very least you get more insight in what exactly you are doing.

@thor Lose of information also gets passed down when merging.

@thor (2/2) re-train a working model with not-properly tagged pictures of corgis, now all dogs are going to start looking a little more like corgis

@thor (1/2) That depends heavily on what model you are using, most models out there are merges, when you merge a model, defects in one model get passed down. A very common defect is ignoring the tokens in the prompt, like for example, ignoring the second token, or the fifth. This is lowkey intentional. Also, moving up the cfg scale a little will also help. Another problem is that retraining models make the model lose info, for example, if you...

@thor (2/2) In the negative prompt "more than 2 hands", the model will find it hard to generate good hands, since it is both being instructed to generate hands (2) and to not generate hands, and pictures with 2 hands and pictures with more than 2 hands share way too many similarities (the presence of hands). This will result in an increased rate of deformities in the hands. To properly add negative prompt is best to keep things short and precise, or use embeddings.

@thor (1/2) Simply put, if you type "anime girl" in the prompt, the diffusion model will generate something, anything, that could fit the "anime girl" tag, that may include missing limbs or deformities. Because of this, you could either add "cute" in the prompt or "zombie" in the negative prompt and it will try to generate something that fits those characteristics.
With that been said, blindly adding negative prompts will backfire, let's say you put in the prompt "2 hands" and...

doggel boosted
doggel boosted
doggel boosted
doggel boosted
doggel boosted
believers in a soul have no problems with AI - there's a difference between AI and humans and there will always be. the same is true for proper mechanistic thinkers, it doesn't matter what the process is, a human is a machine so an AI is just the same.

there is a problem for people who want to both have a mechanistic world view and also want there to be something special and unique about humans. they make tons of 'human essence of the gap' arguments, where the one thing that AI can't do well at any moment in time is 'essentially human'. the other approach is explaining away anything as 'not real intelligence', as the 'stochastic parrot' crowd tries to do.
doggel boosted

Fun fact Monday:
There are more documented cases of public school teachers molesting minors than there are cases of Catholic priests doing the same thing.

doggel boosted

Thanks to the technique-affirming care you can get from AI now, we can all identify as artists

doggel boosted
doggel boosted

Another indicator that the people have lost all hope in the public sector is the recent huge rise in gun sales across America.

doggel boosted

Wow.

Americans say tyranny is the the only possible way to have jobs, but why was the USA to able have freedom and have a strong economy in 1960?

doggel boosted
doggel boosted
Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.