I am not proposing an absense of borders
I am proposing making the borders smaller and making the borders into borders of entry but not borders of exit
Having area claimed by no community allows people to set up new communities bound by different rules with their own borders of entry
Having every where claimed by a government prevents competing communities from coming to existence allowing a monopoly of UN recognised Kike approved governments
If you have to pay property tax to own land to grow food on then thisvmeans you must pay tax to eat
And paying taxrs is forced employment with extra steps
And someone who is forced to be your employee and does not choose to be your employee is your slave
If you could work to grow food on your own land without being employeed then that might not be slavery
Work is not the same as employment
People should have a right to eat without being employed so long as they work or someone who does work chooses to bestow charity upon them such as for example feeding their own baby food that the baby never worked to earn
A farmer who grows their own food but does not sell it might work but be unemployed
A farmer who is forced to sell their labor or property to a third party to pay property taxes on their farm land is employed
I can see the point U are trying to make.
And I would still like to separate the arguments.
The property tax thing is right up slavery, Jewry.
But the Nations natural resources, such as land should rightfully belong to the Nation. Or it will become objects of foreign private speculation.
But a citizen of the Nation should have the right to use the common land for camping. But this right should not be extended to foreigners.
You can always leave
Bitbutter
Youtube
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fasTSY-dB-s
There are only two people on an island
Jeff asserts he owns all the island
Jeff is the government
The other guy is the tax slave
I would suggest that land that is within a certain distance or greater of any community should be treated like international waters and that the geographical size of governments should not extend much beyond the geographic borders of local communities
That disputes in this area treated like international waters can be settled by arbitrated agreements by nearby communities
That someone should need to form a community near the resources to claim them
& no more money
I have never heard of anyone being deprived of the right to eat due to lack of employment.
Far as I see it, the whole right to eat phrase is incorrect. How about this, it is Ur own responsibility to feed yourself?
If U grow Ur own food or work or run Ur own business or how U choose to provide is Ur own deal.
Farmers being forced to sell their land due to new inheritance laws is Jewry. It is because farmers are independent. Thus they have (too much) freedom.
Ur idea would men the end of all Nations.
Only the Jew would wish for such a thing. For it would also mean the end of our culture and race.
Blood and honour. A people without borders will soon cease to exist.
The idea that people would be able to cooperate on some "international land" is a pipe dream. The strong would rule over the weak and unless those most advanced used weapons to defend themselves it would mean that those races of the many would triumph.
As it is right now there is no where that I can exit from a territory recognised as owned by a government in the United Nations to step unto land not owned by the United Nations and start my own community with borders to prevent entry of those who wish to msliciously exploit me such as but not limited to practitioners of the Kike religion, lifestyle or culture