Coca-Cola is frequently used as an argument against a libertarian state.
That is, if you have markets alone decide things, you get what people want instead of what they need.
There is truth to this.
Counterpoint is that McDonald's has responded to market pressure and their food is about half healthier now.
Bigger point is that the herd is a threat, and markets are not a hinge against this except under dire Darwinistic conditions.
That is, in a cyberpunk dystopia, where your choice to buy Coca-Cola over ammo turns out to be fatal before you can breed, selection pressures will shape the market.
But that goes out the window with functional agriculture.
@cjd @h4890 @korsier @freepatriot
I do not think it is that simple. Decentralized systems can be politicized as well.
And often market choice is stupid...
But if you allow the higher IQ to educate themselves as they see fit, you get competent people.
@h4890 @korsier @freepatriot @cjd
Tom Wolfe wrote expertly about this
The academics always resent business for making people wealthier
It's revenge of the eggheads against the salesmen
Solid point: reality is consistent, and this is all we know or need know.
I agree with this line of reasoning.
(a) if it is a simulcra with no consequences, we are simply amusing ourselves winning the game.
(b) if it is the solipsistic state, the individual is making his/her mind more consistent.
(c) if it is idealistic or materialistic, the consequences are important in either case.
@freepatriot thats dumb