FreedomPatriot
boosted
FreedomPatriot
boosted
Americans think that license plate readers don't track them.
Americans think that license plate readers don't track them.
The elites allowed Americans to have cars, airplanes, straws, and stoves and then they banned them.
Why do you think the globalists will allow you to keep the Internet?
Prisons and North Korea don't have the web for a reason. Ideas and communication tools are dangerous.
FreedomPatriot
boosted
Everything is illegal, everyone is a criminal, everyone is under surveillance 24/7, and no one cares.
Living in a police state means that you must live in dread of being arrested. You can't help feeling hopeless.
FreedomPatriot
boosted
Trump doesn't want you to have guns no more than Harris did.
FreedomPatriot
boosted
The main theme of the new covenant with Christ is that it supersedes the old covenant and its promises. The new covenant is a new and better covenant that is based on the blood of Christ, rather than the blood of animals (Hebrews 8:6-13, 9:11-14).
In this sense, the new covenant with Christ does indeed negate the previous promises, at least in the sense that they are no longer the primary focus of God's relationship with humanity. The new covenant is a new and better way of relating to God, one that is based on faith in Christ rather than obedience to the law.
The flaws I mentioned earlier are more related to the interpretation of the Old Testament promises, rather than the main theme of the new covenant with Christ. However, if we accept that the new covenant with Christ supersedes the old covenant and its promises, then it's possible to argue that the previous promises are no longer relevant or applicable.
In this sense, the new covenant with Christ can be seen as a fulfillment of the Old Testament promises, but also a transcendence of them. The new covenant is a new and better way of relating to God, one that is based on faith in Christ rather than obedience to the law.
It's worth noting that the apostle Paul writes that the old covenant is "obsolete" and "will soon disappear" (Hebrews 8:13), and that the new covenant is a "better covenant" that is based on "better promises" (Hebrews 8:6). This suggests that the new covenant with Christ is indeed a new and better way of relating to God, one that supersedes the old covenant and its promises.
In this sense, the main theme of the new covenant with Christ can be seen as a fulfillment of the Old Testament promises, but also a transcendence of them. The new covenant is a new and better way of relating to God, one that is based on faith in Christ rather than obedience to the law.
In this sense, the new covenant with Christ does indeed negate the previous promises, at least in the sense that they are no longer the primary focus of God's relationship with humanity. The new covenant is a new and better way of relating to God, one that is based on faith in Christ rather than obedience to the law.
The flaws I mentioned earlier are more related to the interpretation of the Old Testament promises, rather than the main theme of the new covenant with Christ. However, if we accept that the new covenant with Christ supersedes the old covenant and its promises, then it's possible to argue that the previous promises are no longer relevant or applicable.
In this sense, the new covenant with Christ can be seen as a fulfillment of the Old Testament promises, but also a transcendence of them. The new covenant is a new and better way of relating to God, one that is based on faith in Christ rather than obedience to the law.
It's worth noting that the apostle Paul writes that the old covenant is "obsolete" and "will soon disappear" (Hebrews 8:13), and that the new covenant is a "better covenant" that is based on "better promises" (Hebrews 8:6). This suggests that the new covenant with Christ is indeed a new and better way of relating to God, one that supersedes the old covenant and its promises.
In this sense, the main theme of the new covenant with Christ can be seen as a fulfillment of the Old Testament promises, but also a transcendence of them. The new covenant is a new and better way of relating to God, one that is based on faith in Christ rather than obedience to the law.
FreedomPatriot
boosted
Americans say that the US is the land of the free, but North Koreans also believe that North Korea is a free country.
FreedomPatriot
boosted
✝️
@freepatriot Both are terrible people they get what coming to them when the west collapses just like Ernst Zundel predicted
Trump doesn't want you to have guns no more than Harris did.
FreedomPatriot
boosted
This is me being a bit lazy and I did manipulate a bit, but: t
The fulfillment in Christ could indeed be the fulfillment of all the Old Testament promises. This view is often referred to as the "already-not yet" perspective, where the kingdom of God is already present in Christ, but its full manifestation is still to come.
In this view, the promises to Israel are not necessarily about a future literal earthly kingdom, but rather about the spiritual kingdom of God that has been established through Christ. The promises of land, restoration, and kingdom are seen as being fulfilled in a spiritual sense, with Christ as the ultimate fulfillment of God's promises.
This interpretation is supported by various biblical passages, such as:
Jesus' statement that the kingdom of God is "in your midst" (Luke 17:21) and that it is a spiritual kingdom that is not of this world (John 18:36).
The apostle Paul's statement that the true circumcision is a matter of the heart, not of the flesh (Romans 2:28-29), and that the true Israel is the spiritual Israel, not the physical one (Romans 9:6-8).
The book of Hebrews' argument that the Old Testament sacrifices and rituals were only shadows of the true reality, which is Christ (Hebrews 8:5, 10:1).
In this view, the fulfillment in Christ is not just a partial fulfillment, but rather the ultimate fulfillment of all God's promises. The Old Testament promises are seen as being fulfilled in a way that is more profound and universal than a literal earthly kingdom.
The fulfillment in Christ could indeed be the fulfillment of all the Old Testament promises. This view is often referred to as the "already-not yet" perspective, where the kingdom of God is already present in Christ, but its full manifestation is still to come.
In this view, the promises to Israel are not necessarily about a future literal earthly kingdom, but rather about the spiritual kingdom of God that has been established through Christ. The promises of land, restoration, and kingdom are seen as being fulfilled in a spiritual sense, with Christ as the ultimate fulfillment of God's promises.
This interpretation is supported by various biblical passages, such as:
Jesus' statement that the kingdom of God is "in your midst" (Luke 17:21) and that it is a spiritual kingdom that is not of this world (John 18:36).
The apostle Paul's statement that the true circumcision is a matter of the heart, not of the flesh (Romans 2:28-29), and that the true Israel is the spiritual Israel, not the physical one (Romans 9:6-8).
The book of Hebrews' argument that the Old Testament sacrifices and rituals were only shadows of the true reality, which is Christ (Hebrews 8:5, 10:1).
In this view, the fulfillment in Christ is not just a partial fulfillment, but rather the ultimate fulfillment of all God's promises. The Old Testament promises are seen as being fulfilled in a way that is more profound and universal than a literal earthly kingdom.
Everything is illegal, everyone is a criminal, everyone is under surveillance 24/7, and no one cares.
Living in a police state means that you must live in dread of being arrested. You can't help feeling hopeless.
Americans say that the US is the land of the free, but North Koreans also believe that North Korea is a free country.
FreedomPatriot
boosted
FreedomPatriot
boosted
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @Tony @freepatriot @d9dba0e072bdb353dfb0020de159126af47e69e133ea91bbd48e8bede37320e2 @WilhelmIII @placebo @k
> Holy Fathers in our (True Orthodox) Communion; the first two as a matter of fact.
Constantine only converted to Xtianity in the first place because his murders were so heinous that the Pagan priesthood of his day refused to absolve him of his crimes. According to Zosimus they had told him that no amount of lustrations could cleanse him of his malice. So he turned to the Christians who gleefully agreed they could do it with little more than a hand wave. Zosimus went on to say that once he had the whole empire in his grasp he no longer felt the need to conceal his evil disposition and vicious inclinations, but acted as he pleased, without control. That's the guy who decided on the contents of your holy book, and that of every other Xtian on earth (notwithstanding any remaining Gnostics). As to Cyril, he was openly an anti-Semite and viciously anti-Pagan, to the point that even his fellow Xtians were disgusted by his violent bigotry, especially after he instigated the murder of Hypatia under the pretext that her use of an astrolabe constituted "divination" and "witchcraft". In reality it was just a pretext because her popularity threatened his religious hegemony, and bolstered the arguments of his rival politicians, who were largely also Xtians. You can backwards rationalise this all you like, but your "Holy Fathers" were murderous psychopaths, and the rest of the history of your "Traditional Christianity" very much exemplifies it. Not to mention the fact that it wouldn't have a theology whatsoever were it not for wholesale plagiarism of Pagan philosophy, as is also true of Judajism and Islame.
> Traditional Christianity completed the Ancient Faith of All Man.
As always anyone with more than half a brain cell continues to vehemently disagree, myself included. Were the worth of your belief system so self-evident then you wouldn't have had to force it on people, and might have understood from day one that inciting violent bigotry and hatred towards others of a different opinion is by no means a spiritual act. You can't even get the Golden Rule right ffs. Do NOT do to others what THEY do not want you to (ie. Take "No." for an answer.). Foisting your preferences on the unwilling is the hallmark of your faith, because you people are too insecure and compensatory narcissists to grasp the abject stupidity of your arguments, much less why others would conscientiously reject them. It's not a completion of ancient faith. It's a retard superstition masquerading as a religion, just as we were told by the likes of Celsus, Seutonius, Tacitus, Porphyry and so from day one. Hell even Thomas Jefferson referred to Xtianity as a violent superstition. His Pièce de Résistance was instituting separation of church and state in the USA to protect people from it (which he had proudly proclaimed on his tombstone).
The fact is that farcical superstition has so reliably produced genocide on a global scale for the past 2,000 years that anyone with half a wit must understand it to be a feature, not a bug, of that belief system. You can bury your head in the sand and deflect with "No True Scotsman" fallacies all you like, but the fact remains blatantly obvious to anyone with half a brain cell left in their head.
> Holy Fathers in our (True Orthodox) Communion; the first two as a matter of fact.
Constantine only converted to Xtianity in the first place because his murders were so heinous that the Pagan priesthood of his day refused to absolve him of his crimes. According to Zosimus they had told him that no amount of lustrations could cleanse him of his malice. So he turned to the Christians who gleefully agreed they could do it with little more than a hand wave. Zosimus went on to say that once he had the whole empire in his grasp he no longer felt the need to conceal his evil disposition and vicious inclinations, but acted as he pleased, without control. That's the guy who decided on the contents of your holy book, and that of every other Xtian on earth (notwithstanding any remaining Gnostics). As to Cyril, he was openly an anti-Semite and viciously anti-Pagan, to the point that even his fellow Xtians were disgusted by his violent bigotry, especially after he instigated the murder of Hypatia under the pretext that her use of an astrolabe constituted "divination" and "witchcraft". In reality it was just a pretext because her popularity threatened his religious hegemony, and bolstered the arguments of his rival politicians, who were largely also Xtians. You can backwards rationalise this all you like, but your "Holy Fathers" were murderous psychopaths, and the rest of the history of your "Traditional Christianity" very much exemplifies it. Not to mention the fact that it wouldn't have a theology whatsoever were it not for wholesale plagiarism of Pagan philosophy, as is also true of Judajism and Islame.
> Traditional Christianity completed the Ancient Faith of All Man.
As always anyone with more than half a brain cell continues to vehemently disagree, myself included. Were the worth of your belief system so self-evident then you wouldn't have had to force it on people, and might have understood from day one that inciting violent bigotry and hatred towards others of a different opinion is by no means a spiritual act. You can't even get the Golden Rule right ffs. Do NOT do to others what THEY do not want you to (ie. Take "No." for an answer.). Foisting your preferences on the unwilling is the hallmark of your faith, because you people are too insecure and compensatory narcissists to grasp the abject stupidity of your arguments, much less why others would conscientiously reject them. It's not a completion of ancient faith. It's a retard superstition masquerading as a religion, just as we were told by the likes of Celsus, Seutonius, Tacitus, Porphyry and so from day one. Hell even Thomas Jefferson referred to Xtianity as a violent superstition. His Pièce de Résistance was instituting separation of church and state in the USA to protect people from it (which he had proudly proclaimed on his tombstone).
The fact is that farcical superstition has so reliably produced genocide on a global scale for the past 2,000 years that anyone with half a wit must understand it to be a feature, not a bug, of that belief system. You can bury your head in the sand and deflect with "No True Scotsman" fallacies all you like, but the fact remains blatantly obvious to anyone with half a brain cell left in their head.
FreedomPatriot
boosted
