@freepatriot is that a problem, or the main intended purpose?
@freepatriot more and more countries are collecting biometric data upon entering...
Treating tourists like criminals by forcing them to submit biometric fingerprints at the border is a massive violation of privacy. Vacationers should be welcomed, not subjected to invasive surveillance tracking.
When you combine these insulting fingerprinting mandates with endless, bureaucratic ETA hassles, you completely destroy the incentive to visit. People will simply take their money elsewhere. These hostile, tech-heavy border policies don't protect anyone; they just kill the economy.
So if it is by mistake it is okay?
If a reckless driver cause an accident, he or she is still charged based upon the harm and damage they caused.
But in war it is as if, as long as you claim it wasn't on purpose then it is okay.
Never forget that the allied Nations killed between 7 and 9 million Civilian Germans after the end of WW2. And that during the end of the war they bombed every German city with a population over 25.000 souls.
They were never charged with war crimes.
A UN fact-finding mission concluded that the US intentionally targeted a school building in Iran that was struck on the opening day of the war, rejecting the possibility that the school was accidentally hit during an attack on a neighboring Iranian military facility. The investigators found reasonable grounds to believe the attack constituted a war crime.