I know it's InfoWars, but McCullough is real deal and it's an old news, just a new article, everyone should've been aware about it more than a year ago. I remember arguing with my former friend about it, who turned out to be a fucking weakling simp and a cuck. He, like almost any other person I encounter, never listen to me. Like I'm taking information out of my ass instead to referring to qualified dissident sources.

infowars.com/posts/dr-peter-mc

@freerangefornicator

“So it’s now clear, I think the mRNA – that’s the greatest concern was could you take a vaccine inadvertently by close contact [i.e.] kissing, sexual contact, breastfeeding – and it looks like the answer is yes.”

So is it "clear" or does it "looks like"?

Follow

@redmaple You're just picking on their choice of words. From my personal experience there was a Pfizer document in the beginning of the vaccine roll out, which mentioned secondary effects, I remember reading that part, but it's a hard document to find. There were other mentions of shedding by other doctors, but I"m not Jones or Crowder, I don't get paid to do research on WTF globalists are up to, I wish I would though.

· · Web · 0 · 0 · 0
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.