#Prav recently got a contribution for a high priority feature with a bounty.

This was generated using an #LLM and we don't yet have a policy on accepting or rejecting such contributions.

Currently the community is discussing formulating a policy on LLM generated contributions and meanwhile whether to give an exception to this particular contribution or not.

The topic is deeply controversial and we have different opinions in the community.

#genAI #FreeSoftware #OpenSource

@praveen Why is it controversial? If the code does what it does, and is easy to understand, why would you not accept it?

If someone sends you thousand lines of vibe coded b.s. of course you must reject it, regardless of if it does what it claims to do or not.

If the contributor cannot be bothered to make the code easily understandable, LLM or no LLM, I do not see why it should take up your time.

@nilesh @praveen Easily solved by moving liability to the commiter by contract.

Follow

@nilesh @praveen Also note that this could equally apply to non-LLM code if an absurd definition of IP law is used.

· · Web · 0 · 0 · 0
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.