If I get the suspicion that someone is slopping a #curl PR, I ask questions.

If they answer as human and explain their thoughts, this is fine. They used the LLM as a tool, but they are in charge of it. We review, they improve until it‘s accepted.

If their answer is likely from an LLM itself, we are dealing with a meatproxy („Apologies…“ etc). The chances of this PR landing become practically zero.

But I look at the idea behind the PR: was there one? Is it maybe worth doing in another way?

Follow

@icing Ahhh... rationality! Not the weird idea of plain rejecting everything that has been touched by an LLM. LLM:s can be used responsibly to produce good, working code. Many people do not seem to understand this.

· · Web · 0 · 0 · 0
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.