@Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @AuntNorma @Countermeasures @TrevorGoodchild

20% of the World's Oil goes through the Strait of Hormuz, and there is nothing that can stop Iran from blockading the channel with hypersonic missiles. If the US goes to war, the US economy will face a severe recession, if not a depression.

And who do you think the American public, especially Trump's base, blame this war on? No one blames the Iraq War on oil anymore.

Think Weimar hyperinflation but worse.

@Countermeasures @AuntNorma @Kalogerosstilitis2RevengeoftheJunta @TrevorGoodchild

There might be another reason for our lucky break last weekend—that is, the Jews backed out of a war with Iran because they may have realized the effect of closing the Strait of Hormuz might be the last straw before the American public fully loses it.

The pundit below may have seen some disturbing internal polling, and I am of the impression that if the US avoids war, it is rarely if ever out of kindness.

Neofugue boosted
@KingOfWhiteAmerica Men make unprincipled exceptions to their thinking, but civilizations always end up down the slippery slope. I have always maintained that the slippery slope is and never was a fallacy if all modus ponens are correct (given X ∴ Y, Y ∴ Z, Z ∴ A, A ∴ B, if all true, X ∴ B). Thomism and later Roman Catholic/Protestant systems fail because all assume some form of Materialism which eventually leads down the slippery slope to atheism.

Regarding politics, on one side, assuming all men are created equal, then women, then negroes, then homosexuals, then transvestites, and so on and so forth. Conversely, men such as William Luther Pierce and Revilo P. Oliver never gained traction despite their brilliance not only because of repression, but also because without accountability from God one’s only obligations are to himself and his immediate interests.

Of all the people who I have debated with, I have known only one Roman Catholic who in fact understood the implications of my position on Uniformitarianism, let alone Modern Science and Panentheism, so these posts are mostly for like-minded travelers.

My position has always been that any path to victory requires a restoration of true belief in God and a rejection of all other systems. Since Western theology and philosophy for the last millennia is poison, and since Orthodox theology and metaphysics provide a working alternative, Orthodoxy works as the only counter to the current regime despite its current position as of writing.

RT: https://poa.st/objects/f4287df5-527d-408b-b6d2-b59ba365bf3c
Neofugue boosted
@KingOfWhiteAmerica This is a brief and extreme oversimplification of the Absolute Divine Simplicity (ADS) debate for laymen without basic understanding of theological definitions in terms as simple as I can make them (with some academic terms):

Catholicism goes with Aristotle, Orthodoxy goes with Plato.

With Western Christianity (correct terms are Thomism, later Protestantism), God created the natural world with matter as fundamental (academic term is hylomorphic dualism). In Eastern Christianity, God sustains the universe through his energies with information or consciousness as fundamental (academic term is panentheism). In other words, in Western Christianity, the material world is fundamental, whereas in Eastern Christianity, the world operates more as God’s quantum computer.

If ADS is true, then Western Christianity’s position of matter being fundamental is true, and Orthodoxy is false. If ADS is false, then Orthodoxy’s position of consciousness being fundamental is true, and Western Christianity is false.

If matter is fundamental, and thus matter has fundamental rules, Christianity is proven false by modern science (academic term is Uniformitarian Science). If consciousness is fundamental, and thus matter can be altered through changing information, most models of Uniformitarian Science can be rejected as scientific myths.

So, is it possible to view the universe as in fact a quantum computer?

To answer this question, it all depends on pulling away the film before the photons hit the wall in the double slit experiment.

And what do you know!
https:// youtube .com/watch?v= 6xKUass7G8w

The referenced paper in question:
https:// arxiv .org/pdf/quant-ph/9903047

As an important and critical disclaimer, I am not saying that the information in the above video and experiments means that one must by necessity accept Christianity as a matter of fact against his willing. Instead, I am saying is that by adopting the Orthodox model, it allows me to reject the entirety of Uniformitarian Science, itself the basis for the destruction of Christianity since the Enlightenment.

I cannot simplify the above any further.

However, there is another important point that must be discussed—competing worldviews are more about whether or not the claims they make and the system itself are “coherent” and resistant to outside systems, and less about whether or not the system itself can account for its propositions. Anyone can make statements and assert them as "truth," the key element is whether or not these systems can work if "evidence" contrary to those statements falsify the "truth" statements. If an Orthodox Christian can look at Uniformitarian Science and spit on it in disgust the same way he spits on the Pagan idols, it is proof that the system works and can eventually be adopted as a complete unitary political and ideological system (academic term is weltanschauung).

The destruction of Democracy on the basis of the Open Society, and the implementation of Orthodox Christianity on the basis of Canon Law (the Nomocanon), are the stated purposes of this account.

RT: https://poa.st/objects/6d1979e2-f188-422d-81b7-9915ad46941c
Neofugue boosted
There has been much discussion centered on the subject of Darwin and Christianity, but I would like to briefly clarify the position I hold as it can sometimes get lost in the noise of hellthreads.

My main point is that any successful dissident political movement must possess a justification for self-sacrifice to inspire others to take the risk of martyrdom, and that pure atheistic materialism is by its nature incapable of this. This is not about false framing my metaphor of charging into certain death as me calling for us to sacrifice ourselves to achieve victory, but rather it is a reflection on the inherent danger and sacrifice inherent in revolution. This distinction matters because all good systems believe in the act of service to a higher cause—without such belief, those in power simply create chaos for immediate personal benefit. This problem of betrayal, is it happens, was why we lost in the first place.

It should be clarified that I am a traditional Orthodox Christian Monarchist, not a National Socialist, and that my positions reflect those of Imperial Russia. Below are two books, “The Story of the Russian Land” by Alexander Dimitrevich Nechvolodov, and “Reflections of a Russian Statesman” by Konstantin Petrovich Pobedonostsev, both of whom were influential figures in late Imperial Russia.

Consistent within the framework of traditional Eastern Orthodox theology, my writing upholds the traditional panentheistc worldview where God is both immanent and transcendent, God is not bound by natural processes, God may intervene directly in creation without being restricted by secondary causes, and that the natural order is contingent, not autonomous, and thus miracles and divine interventions are not violations of “laws” but expressions of God’s will within a created and upheld order. God is not dependent on mechanistic or uniformitarian processes, the world is not a closed causal system, there is no need for metaphysical naturalism—one can take St. Basil’s “Hexaemeron” literally or analogically—and that creation possesses logoi (divine ideas) rooted in the Logos (Christ).

In short, the world has divine intentionality, and the processes of the world are not self-sufficient but depend on God from moment-to-moment. I do not espouse metaphysical Enlightenment-based foundational myths for modern secular ideologies promoting a universe devoid of inherent purpose or divine order.

I will leave it here for those interested in thinking it through on their own terms.
Show older
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.