@matty Don't we all have a subconscious desire to defy the norm and test the limits, even if there's no personal benefit involved?
Unless we built something ourselves, it's not exactly unusual to want to tear it down. That's not a problem, it's how animals shit test each other.
The problem is exactly the opposite, the weakness, the complacency, the desire for stability/peace/comfort even if the whole structure is corrupt.
We actually need more people willing to tear it all down.
@matty My political ideology is simple, the political system mostly doesn't matter as long as the majority is strong. Even democracy can work if we're talking about a group of 10 people who all have to put in the work and fight to survive. As long as most people are willing to kill for their freedom, we're ok. Right now, there's only one kind of power vacuum that I'm interested in, total normie death. I don't much care what fills the void, so long as collectivism doesn't survive the transition.
@matty Ah yes, "the optics". Ironic but not surprising.
Let's use your advice but for women, shall we? Why does a "stronger society need to pick them up"? Just don't be a retarded sperg, don't be a creep and scream about the patriarchy. You'd be surprised as to how receptive women can be, you incel.
Normies aren't "asleep", they aren't stupid, they are simply weak, like women. They need the collective to survive and thrive. The point of killing normies is precisely to avoid pointless debates
@matty If killing normies was a viable solution, we wouldn't be having this conversation. Normies will die, not because they're exterminated 1 by 1 (they're too many), but because they're weak and weakness kills. It's the natural order, only through endless money printing and unsustainable technological advancements, are most people still alive. Nature favors the strong, all my "political ideology" needs is a slight push from nature, it will happen sooner or later.
@matty @Based_Accelerationist up, down, up, down ...🏋️♂️