@deprecated_ii I'd like to see that, don't know what show it is.
@deprecated_ii @basadeskaiser ....
I think I may became a single issue voter
I think I may became a single issue voter
@monkyyy @deprecated_ii @basadeskaiser It's a good thing for them that the supreme court rules that the unborn is not a person, otherwise, the OP is correct.
@DoubleD @deprecated_ii @basadeskaiser Wow thank you for telling me what the SUPREME COURT thinks. I thought it would be unethical to make yummy baby smoothies, but I trust THE SCIENCE, ill get my baby parts blended straight from planned parenthood, make a prayer to molock, then CONSUME.
Or, hypothetically, I could find 8 mouth abortions vile evil dispite what a bunch of fucking lawyers think. Fucking midwit; this is not a legal definition debate. Its a moral-biological one. When do hearts beat, when do brains form, what size of brain is capable of feeling pain.
Or, hypothetically, I could find 8 mouth abortions vile evil dispite what a bunch of fucking lawyers think. Fucking midwit; this is not a legal definition debate. Its a moral-biological one. When do hearts beat, when do brains form, what size of brain is capable of feeling pain.
Follow
@monkyyy @basadeskaiser @deprecated_ii Calm thyself. I agree that abortion is murdering babies. The original post was about definitions; so, I brought up the definition of a person by the supreme court. I'm adding relevance to your point by including tangential context. I'm not trying to fight you. I know the internet is filled with people trying to pick a fight, but it doesn't have to be that way.
