Escorts have raised fees in response to inflation, but are making less overall because they're having fewer bookings -- theorized as being because men are prioritizing survival over fun.
Shouldn't one of them try to undercut the market? She'd have to work for less "per client" but could test out if she'd make more $$ because she'd get more BOOKINGS, being more affordable.
Yes, longer hours for less hourly pay, but you end up with more income because in those hours you're actually making money.
Should supply and / or demand affect prices in this market, in your (y'all's) opinion?
@Zeb Great idea. I came to the conclusion that this might be something men think about (how to solve the problem and make money when it isn't just landing in our lap), and that these bitches are just SOL because they won't even brainstorm like this, even when they're their own boss.
@RoninGrey
You're thinking like a man. We have to actually do valuable work, we can't live off sex like women do.
My best advice for women in hard times is pretty simple: get a boyfriend, treat him well.
@RoninGrey
Supply and demand are controlling the price, what most people miss is that the CURRENCY itself also has a supply and demand.
The escorts are right to raise their price as there is a higher supply of dollars, the fewer bookings is due to the depressed economy. Escorts/prostitution are discretionary spending - bad during recessions.
The only way out of stagflation is honest money (gold) and higher productivity: the escorts need to offer better/additional services for their higher fee.