In an interview with the Columbia Journalism Review, Tucker Carlson announced that he plans to help build a new third political party. He says he doesn't want to run for office himself, but wants to help create an alternative to what he calls a one-party political establishment.
@Twig Won’t work, waste of energy. Just take away women’s right to vote.
Wowza…, any other suggestions?
They literally have two coat rooms and two lunch rooms in the Capitol building.
They have kept it a two party system by design.
And it's a Uniparty at the end of the day.
My understanding is that Tucker meant building a new party that's open to people from different political backgrounds, Republicans, Democrats, independents, and anyone who shares its core goals.
I haven't watched the full interview yet, so that's just my impression, but it seems like he's aiming for an America First coalition rather than simply creating another truckload of party.
@Twig He’ll be assassinated if it gains any real traction.
Really…., do you think he will survive in the endgame?
@Twig Sounds like he’s controlled opposition.
Big Controlled Opposition…
Could you dare to name the ones who might join him knowingly and unknowingly…..?
@Twig Name? Not really, but it feels similar to Nick Fuentes’s followers. I mean the baby boomers sold the US out because they saw this country as an economic zone and not a nation with a culture and people. Can I blame them for their own self interest or do I blame the generation before them whose policies lead to this outcome. The outcome of giving women who are not equal to men but have an important role in society political power a huge mistake.
Now equality is destroying the strong
What happened to Nick's followers?
And what do the Baby Boomers have to do with this? Just collecting their Social Security checks?
Also, where does this idea come from that girls are "weakening" society? What exactly do you mean by "weakening"?
You seem to be drawing a very broad conclusion, that girls are somehow destroying the country. Can you be specific?
@TenaciousWolf
Interesting.
You said:
"He'll be assassinated if it gains any real traction."
"Sounds like he's controlled opposition."
"The baby boomers sold the US out..."
"Giving women... political power [was] a huge mistake."
"Now equality is destroying the strong."
That’s not an argument though, it’s just a bunch of big claims thrown together.
I asked for clarification on what you meant, but you didn’t actually answer any of it and just wrote me off like a janitor mopping a 🚽 floor.