Listened to ten minutes or so.

Not picking on you, just giving my honest feedback. It's become cool to hate Nick Fuentes, so I am pushing all that aside to sort out how I feel about this. (And when I say "all that", I also mean accusations he is a Fed, and my own distaste at him collaborating with Richard Spencer.)

We can probably boil down Nick's argument to stating that JD Vance is a tool of Team B. He has probably got that all ironed out. Without having listened to the entire thing, I don't bet that he's wrong.

I think how I feel about it is the same way I used to feel when people (on Gab, mainly) would endlessly go on about Trump being a tool of the Jews this or that way during the early part of his first administration. My thinking then was "Ok, so what do I do with this information?"

The idea that the guys currently in power who, all the downfalls aside, represent a clear night and day difference between who was in power and who could have been in power actually are doing nothing beneficial for us just doesn't mean much for me at this point. If that's true, I should just about stop caring, since this is the best we're likely to get in electoral politics indefinitely.

Now, the idea that the Jews' Team's A and B are at war with each other, with Team B wanting to restore normalcy because it's good for them, and us being able to latch onto that agenda to make gains, that means something to me. That is actionable. People might call it a cope, but the other side of the coin just leaves not much interest because there is nothing to be done.

My two cents. In terms of poo pooing narrative X in shock jock fashion, Nick is still adept.

RT: https://merovingian.club/users/UncleIroh/statuses/114034585578380252

@DailyStormerDigest

Appreciate the nuance. I also get the Nick hate, but I too am pushing that aside to sort it all out.

Nick makes some credible arguments here. It's long, but worth listening to since this speaks to plans that have been long in the planning and are equally long in execution. Descriptively, he's right about Vance and that means something.

Team B is bad news, we all know that, but this sheds some light on how bad.

@UncleIroh @DailyStormerDigest The thing is, whatever legitimate points Fuentes makes (for example against Western women) are just drowned out by his deafening, defiant faggotry. There are people out there making the same points as him who don't openly hate and fear the female form, or compare sex with women to eating shit.

And that's not even getting into the potential Fed issue.

Basically, I think Fuentes should be completely ignored as a commentator and analyst, let alone as a Leader - he actively taints and undermines worthwhile positions by associating with them.