https://x.com/Timcast/status/1968434586054013305
Nick Fuentes is correct.
This theory that Mossad is behind Charlie Kirk's assassination makes no sense whatsoever.
The Right is simply being psyoped into accepting tyranny from Trump and Stephen Miller, in the name of protecting everyone from the "far Left" and Jews. One only needs to watch propagandists, like Sam Hyde, to see how badly the establishment wants you to get emotional over Charlie fucking Kirk.
@Based_Accelerationist Damn Dude come on half correct half wrong yeah they are using the Kirk Hoax as an excuse For Tyranny but nobody died unless You are saying that Mossad stage create a Hollywood movie Ok maybe You are getting it but if You think someone really die You are clueless
@VeganMGTOW Even if I believed it was fake, I wouldn't confidently assert that notion on such flimsy "evidence". I would treat it as a hunch at best.
And what harms your credibility further, is the fact you also claim EVERYTHING is fake.
Again, present better evidence, or no one in their right mind will ever believe you.
@Based_Accelerationist Will this also can be classify as flimsy evidence??
@VeganMGTOW You tell me, do you think that proves something?
So far, this is a good showcase of the difference between autism and critical thinking skills.
Patterns are everywhere, the key is to distinguish the meaningful ones from the coincidences.
@VeganMGTOW You've been asked to provide evidence. You linked to a scene of a TV show episode, that aired on the same day Kirk died, where a right-wing character is shot in the neck.
On the other hand, we have a lot of video evidence of the murder, from different angles, all of it consistent and convincing.
Are people supposed to disregard their lying eyes, simply because of a detail that might very well be a coincidence?