Every argument I've read against the net tax payer voter system is boils down to arguments that assume: Utilitarianism is the only valid school of ethics, assuming Egalitarianism is an essential principle of democracy, the convoluted tax codes we have now must always exist, or the franchise is a fundamental right from birth for an individual in a jurisdiction; thus, all actions away from universal suffrage are a form of disenfranchisement, which is inherently bad for unexplained reasons.
@DoubleD My only reason against the net tax payer vote system is the last part: the voting.
I'm with the founding fathers that no one should have any inherent voting rights at all - all districts should decide by themselves however they like who will represent them in their state legislature (trial by combat for ex) and all relevant laws that affect their lives for their district should be defined locally, whatever way they want.
There could be voting but it would be by district's choice.
