You're strawmanning and you know it.
There are "leaders" and there are leaders. Political leaders are psychopaths, actual leaders aren't interested in power but in working for the greater good, so they never end up in politics.
Instead of going directly ad hominem against those with different convictions you'd better study power dynamics more thoroughly. Or better yet: get decades of experience with being an actual leader yourself.
I have and I'm even worse in your book: not a libertarian, but a political anarchist. No "government", period. I've created and led three big companies throughout my lifetime, but I was never in for the power.
Most people don't have a clue about what actual leadership is: it's actually a role that requires humility and immense respect for those you lead. As a leader you are just the one steering: they are the ones actually making the ship move.
What is sad is people like you enslaving others with your complicity in the tyranny of statism, whether you understand it or not. You support an oligarchy you aren't even aware of.
But did you really create an entire troll account just to post this?
@freepatriot that's kinda self-defeating and paradoxical. Every group needs leadership, a ship can't have hundred rudders or it won't go anywhere. Understanding this fact of reality, mature and sensible people will push to select the most capable leaders to get this thing going. But libertarians have an abstract and infantile relationship with reality, it's actually sad.