My thoughts on democrats and saying no to guns.

Without lethal force, laws are meaningless. It’s all about power for them, they think if they submit to those who rule, they’ll have a seat at the throne when history has shown eventually after the competition is wiped out they eat themselves.

@TenaciousWolf Yes, democracy, like most, if not all, other forms of government, ultimately rests on violence.

That is why it is not possible for libertarians to vote. It goes against the non-aggression principle. Christians too, should, if they are not hyppocrites, not vote.

@h4890 @TenaciousWolf
Voting is a mistake. As with everything, only those who carry responsibility and are net contributors should have the authority and voice to make decisions.
By definition, they are responsible for others too - heavy is the head that wears the crown.

@Zeb @TenaciousWolf This is the way! Only those who pay in, get a say. The ones who don't must remain silent. That would, for a start, improve our current political decisions enormously.

@h4890 @Zeb @TenaciousWolf If Whites are the minority in their own countries and the elites choose nons as their workers, how would a pay to play system improve things?

Net taxpayers contribute more to global homo than random criminals. Rewarding the former is a mistake.

You're right that violence decides everything. The answer isn't to change how voting works for the sake of libertarians and Judeo Christians, it's to stop being domesticated and start valuing genes over everything else.

@Based_Accelerationist @h4890 @TenaciousWolf
That's also a trap if you value genes over everything else. That's a weakness that the jews have historically exploited by transmitting their genes/lineage through their women, to the point where the jewish whore who makes plastic surgery and disguises herself as a white woman.
Life is about implementing several solutions and building on top of each other. You start by genes, then net contributors and authority to those responsible in that community.

@Zeb @Based_Accelerationist @TenaciousWolf Genes are value free in and of themselves. In order to make sense, you must specify the traits you like and justify why those trains and not others.

Once that step is done, we can then move on to discussing genes, which genes gives rise to the traits and based on that, who will live and who will die.

@h4890 @Zeb @TenaciousWolf These are the traits I like and will defend: My own.
These are the traits I don't like and will not defend: Others.

That's how normal people think. We aren't global citizens, we're genetic legacies.

But go ahead and call your own genes "value free", the tribalistic elites will likely agree.

If you're White, stop repeating controlled op talking points and consuming content made by government assets, watch Blackpilled and KnowMoreNews instead.

@Based_Accelerationist @Zeb @TenaciousWolf What are your own traits?

I'm just trying to understand, and through that, make you clarify your position.

You will benefit from this exercise.

@h4890 My genetic traits. My genotype, my phenotype, they go far beyond skin color, they determine everything, from the way we think and act to how we look.

We all understand it's in our interest to defend our offspring, our family members at the expense of strangers. Race is an extension of that family. A race that protects itself will thrive (Js) and those who betray it will lose everything (Whites).

Listen to the elites/winners and you'll see life is genetic warfare: https://media.nicecrew.digital/d1cb90a4cf23a23b27d459c48f51869b6174e31484b8d5fa3b7c53b09cbdf11d.mp4