Now that the shitty fad is over, I can safely say that Cards Against Humanity was just a shitty imitation of Apples to Apples, and it wasn't even more fun than it. Apples to Apples allowed for genuine absurd responses whereas Cards Against Humanity just reveled in vulgarity. It's for 30 year old kidults who don't have friends but want to simulate friendship with other bugmen by saying inappropriate things in front of people.

@LouisConde It was always bad, but at the time of creation they were able to get that anti-Bush edge factor (many cards were clearly a product of the 2000s era politics). But the creators revealed themselves be non-edgelords by caving to the trannies when they pulled a card (one of the cards was "a passable tranny" or something like that).

You cannot be both "oh we are so edgy" but censor yourselves. But what can you expect from standard leftists? Certainly no consistency.

Follow

@LouisConde And once you get past the edge, the game itself gets boring. Very boring. Not that they had any real edge other than "Republicans bad!" You might notice that every overtly negative card is always against those on the right, while no one on the left has anything directly negative.

Not that I think we should come to the defense of controlled opposition/mainstream right wingers, but the leftist bias just makes the game faux edgy.

· · Web · 0 · 0 · 1
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.