Neofugue @neofugue@merovingian.club
- Annihilation Social:
- https://annihilation.social/users/neofugue
Reactionary Orthodox Academic
Profile is of Ivan the Formidable
Banner is of the Conquest of Kazan
Joined Jun 2024
Neofugue
boosted
Given Israel is losing its global prestige, legitimacy, and backing from its reluctant allies, the question arises as to why it continues to destabilize the Middle East instead of declaring victory and salvaging its tenuous position and dwindling support.
This is because the leadership of Israel understands the main weakness of the Jewish state—that the Jews have no serious martial culture—and as such cannot maintain balance-of-power politics. If Israel does not maintain regional hegemony, that is, if Israel cannot divide all of its neighbors into insignificant petty states, Israel risks annihilation.
In most countries, the conservative, religious rural population serves as the bedrock for military service, but in Israel, the conservative Ultra-Orthodox Haredim actively refuse to serve in the military, leaving the socially liberal and dwindling (low TFR) urban population to do most of the fighting. Therefore, Israel cannot sustain heavy casualties in its wars, forcing its military to rely on subterfuge, surprise attacks, overwhelming air power and Western munitions to win regional conflicts—Israel cannot sustain the casualties required to take out Hamas’ tunnels through conventional means, instead focusing on slaughtering as much of the civilian population as politically possible.
The politically correct position is that Israel must maintain offensive capability at all times because of its small geographic size, but this is merely a cover for Israel's true weakness. Because Israel lacks a martial, conservative base to draw soldiers from, it cannot survive defensive wars.
As such, if Israel is ever forced to fight a regional conflict with peer adversary, Israel cannot survive a Rorke’s-Drift-type scenario, a possibility that becomes ever more likely as the United States continues to decline. Thus, the only hope Israel has of surviving is to use Orange Man to destroy Iran and divide it into several small petty states. If not, Iran can bide its time, wait for the United States to decline, wait for Israel’s urban progressive population to dwindle, and strike when the time is right.
All of this is because the Jews understand they cannot compete with peer adversaries. Perhaps this should be taken into consideration regarding other matters...
This is because the leadership of Israel understands the main weakness of the Jewish state—that the Jews have no serious martial culture—and as such cannot maintain balance-of-power politics. If Israel does not maintain regional hegemony, that is, if Israel cannot divide all of its neighbors into insignificant petty states, Israel risks annihilation.
In most countries, the conservative, religious rural population serves as the bedrock for military service, but in Israel, the conservative Ultra-Orthodox Haredim actively refuse to serve in the military, leaving the socially liberal and dwindling (low TFR) urban population to do most of the fighting. Therefore, Israel cannot sustain heavy casualties in its wars, forcing its military to rely on subterfuge, surprise attacks, overwhelming air power and Western munitions to win regional conflicts—Israel cannot sustain the casualties required to take out Hamas’ tunnels through conventional means, instead focusing on slaughtering as much of the civilian population as politically possible.
The politically correct position is that Israel must maintain offensive capability at all times because of its small geographic size, but this is merely a cover for Israel's true weakness. Because Israel lacks a martial, conservative base to draw soldiers from, it cannot survive defensive wars.
As such, if Israel is ever forced to fight a regional conflict with peer adversary, Israel cannot survive a Rorke’s-Drift-type scenario, a possibility that becomes ever more likely as the United States continues to decline. Thus, the only hope Israel has of surviving is to use Orange Man to destroy Iran and divide it into several small petty states. If not, Iran can bide its time, wait for the United States to decline, wait for Israel’s urban progressive population to dwindle, and strike when the time is right.
All of this is because the Jews understand they cannot compete with peer adversaries. Perhaps this should be taken into consideration regarding other matters...
Neofugue
boosted
@KingOfWhiteAmerica Men make unprincipled exceptions to their thinking, but civilizations always end up down the slippery slope. I have always maintained that the slippery slope is and never was a fallacy if all modus ponens are correct (given X ∴ Y, Y ∴ Z, Z ∴ A, A ∴ B, if all true, X ∴ B). Thomism and later Roman Catholic/Protestant systems fail because all assume some form of Materialism which eventually leads down the slippery slope to atheism.
Regarding politics, on one side, assuming all men are created equal, then women, then negroes, then homosexuals, then transvestites, and so on and so forth. Conversely, men such as William Luther Pierce and Revilo P. Oliver never gained traction despite their brilliance not only because of repression, but also because without accountability from God one’s only obligations are to himself and his immediate interests.
Of all the people who I have debated with, I have known only one Roman Catholic who in fact understood the implications of my position on Uniformitarianism, let alone Modern Science and Panentheism, so these posts are mostly for like-minded travelers.
My position has always been that any path to victory requires a restoration of true belief in God and a rejection of all other systems. Since Western theology and philosophy for the last millennia is poison, and since Orthodox theology and metaphysics provide a working alternative, Orthodoxy works as the only counter to the current regime despite its current position as of writing.
RT: https://poa.st/objects/f4287df5-527d-408b-b6d2-b59ba365bf3c
Regarding politics, on one side, assuming all men are created equal, then women, then negroes, then homosexuals, then transvestites, and so on and so forth. Conversely, men such as William Luther Pierce and Revilo P. Oliver never gained traction despite their brilliance not only because of repression, but also because without accountability from God one’s only obligations are to himself and his immediate interests.
Of all the people who I have debated with, I have known only one Roman Catholic who in fact understood the implications of my position on Uniformitarianism, let alone Modern Science and Panentheism, so these posts are mostly for like-minded travelers.
My position has always been that any path to victory requires a restoration of true belief in God and a rejection of all other systems. Since Western theology and philosophy for the last millennia is poison, and since Orthodox theology and metaphysics provide a working alternative, Orthodoxy works as the only counter to the current regime despite its current position as of writing.
RT: https://poa.st/objects/f4287df5-527d-408b-b6d2-b59ba365bf3c
Neofugue
boosted
@KingOfWhiteAmerica This is a brief and extreme oversimplification of the Absolute Divine Simplicity (ADS) debate for laymen without basic understanding of theological definitions in terms as simple as I can make them (with some academic terms):
Catholicism goes with Aristotle, Orthodoxy goes with Plato.
With Western Christianity (correct terms are Thomism, later Protestantism), God created the natural world with matter as fundamental (academic term is hylomorphic dualism). In Eastern Christianity, God sustains the universe through his energies with information or consciousness as fundamental (academic term is panentheism). In other words, in Western Christianity, the material world is fundamental, whereas in Eastern Christianity, the world operates more as God’s quantum computer.
If ADS is true, then Western Christianity’s position of matter being fundamental is true, and Orthodoxy is false. If ADS is false, then Orthodoxy’s position of consciousness being fundamental is true, and Western Christianity is false.
If matter is fundamental, and thus matter has fundamental rules, Christianity is proven false by modern science (academic term is Uniformitarian Science). If consciousness is fundamental, and thus matter can be altered through changing information, most models of Uniformitarian Science can be rejected as scientific myths.
So, is it possible to view the universe as in fact a quantum computer?
To answer this question, it all depends on pulling away the film before the photons hit the wall in the double slit experiment.
And what do you know!
https:// youtube .com/watch?v= 6xKUass7G8w
The referenced paper in question:
https:// arxiv .org/pdf/quant-ph/9903047
As an important and critical disclaimer, I am not saying that the information in the above video and experiments means that one must by necessity accept Christianity as a matter of fact against his willing. Instead, I am saying is that by adopting the Orthodox model, it allows me to reject the entirety of Uniformitarian Science, itself the basis for the destruction of Christianity since the Enlightenment.
I cannot simplify the above any further.
However, there is another important point that must be discussed—competing worldviews are more about whether or not the claims they make and the system itself are “coherent” and resistant to outside systems, and less about whether or not the system itself can account for its propositions. Anyone can make statements and assert them as "truth," the key element is whether or not these systems can work if "evidence" contrary to those statements falsify the "truth" statements. If an Orthodox Christian can look at Uniformitarian Science and spit on it in disgust the same way he spits on the Pagan idols, it is proof that the system works and can eventually be adopted as a complete unitary political and ideological system (academic term is weltanschauung).
The destruction of Democracy on the basis of the Open Society, and the implementation of Orthodox Christianity on the basis of Canon Law (the Nomocanon), are the stated purposes of this account.
RT: https://poa.st/objects/6d1979e2-f188-422d-81b7-9915ad46941c
Catholicism goes with Aristotle, Orthodoxy goes with Plato.
With Western Christianity (correct terms are Thomism, later Protestantism), God created the natural world with matter as fundamental (academic term is hylomorphic dualism). In Eastern Christianity, God sustains the universe through his energies with information or consciousness as fundamental (academic term is panentheism). In other words, in Western Christianity, the material world is fundamental, whereas in Eastern Christianity, the world operates more as God’s quantum computer.
If ADS is true, then Western Christianity’s position of matter being fundamental is true, and Orthodoxy is false. If ADS is false, then Orthodoxy’s position of consciousness being fundamental is true, and Western Christianity is false.
If matter is fundamental, and thus matter has fundamental rules, Christianity is proven false by modern science (academic term is Uniformitarian Science). If consciousness is fundamental, and thus matter can be altered through changing information, most models of Uniformitarian Science can be rejected as scientific myths.
So, is it possible to view the universe as in fact a quantum computer?
To answer this question, it all depends on pulling away the film before the photons hit the wall in the double slit experiment.
And what do you know!
https:// youtube .com/watch?v= 6xKUass7G8w
The referenced paper in question:
https:// arxiv .org/pdf/quant-ph/9903047
As an important and critical disclaimer, I am not saying that the information in the above video and experiments means that one must by necessity accept Christianity as a matter of fact against his willing. Instead, I am saying is that by adopting the Orthodox model, it allows me to reject the entirety of Uniformitarian Science, itself the basis for the destruction of Christianity since the Enlightenment.
I cannot simplify the above any further.
However, there is another important point that must be discussed—competing worldviews are more about whether or not the claims they make and the system itself are “coherent” and resistant to outside systems, and less about whether or not the system itself can account for its propositions. Anyone can make statements and assert them as "truth," the key element is whether or not these systems can work if "evidence" contrary to those statements falsify the "truth" statements. If an Orthodox Christian can look at Uniformitarian Science and spit on it in disgust the same way he spits on the Pagan idols, it is proof that the system works and can eventually be adopted as a complete unitary political and ideological system (academic term is weltanschauung).
The destruction of Democracy on the basis of the Open Society, and the implementation of Orthodox Christianity on the basis of Canon Law (the Nomocanon), are the stated purposes of this account.
RT: https://poa.st/objects/6d1979e2-f188-422d-81b7-9915ad46941c
Neofugue
boosted
There has been much discussion centered on the subject of Darwin and Christianity, but I would like to briefly clarify the position I hold as it can sometimes get lost in the noise of hellthreads.
My main point is that any successful dissident political movement must possess a justification for self-sacrifice to inspire others to take the risk of martyrdom, and that pure atheistic materialism is by its nature incapable of this. This is not about false framing my metaphor of charging into certain death as me calling for us to sacrifice ourselves to achieve victory, but rather it is a reflection on the inherent danger and sacrifice inherent in revolution. This distinction matters because all good systems believe in the act of service to a higher cause—without such belief, those in power simply create chaos for immediate personal benefit. This problem of betrayal, is it happens, was why we lost in the first place.
It should be clarified that I am a traditional Orthodox Christian Monarchist, not a National Socialist, and that my positions reflect those of Imperial Russia. Below are two books, “The Story of the Russian Land” by Alexander Dimitrevich Nechvolodov, and “Reflections of a Russian Statesman” by Konstantin Petrovich Pobedonostsev, both of whom were influential figures in late Imperial Russia.
Consistent within the framework of traditional Eastern Orthodox theology, my writing upholds the traditional panentheistc worldview where God is both immanent and transcendent, God is not bound by natural processes, God may intervene directly in creation without being restricted by secondary causes, and that the natural order is contingent, not autonomous, and thus miracles and divine interventions are not violations of “laws” but expressions of God’s will within a created and upheld order. God is not dependent on mechanistic or uniformitarian processes, the world is not a closed causal system, there is no need for metaphysical naturalism—one can take St. Basil’s “Hexaemeron” literally or analogically—and that creation possesses logoi (divine ideas) rooted in the Logos (Christ).
In short, the world has divine intentionality, and the processes of the world are not self-sufficient but depend on God from moment-to-moment. I do not espouse metaphysical Enlightenment-based foundational myths for modern secular ideologies promoting a universe devoid of inherent purpose or divine order.
I will leave it here for those interested in thinking it through on their own terms.
My main point is that any successful dissident political movement must possess a justification for self-sacrifice to inspire others to take the risk of martyrdom, and that pure atheistic materialism is by its nature incapable of this. This is not about false framing my metaphor of charging into certain death as me calling for us to sacrifice ourselves to achieve victory, but rather it is a reflection on the inherent danger and sacrifice inherent in revolution. This distinction matters because all good systems believe in the act of service to a higher cause—without such belief, those in power simply create chaos for immediate personal benefit. This problem of betrayal, is it happens, was why we lost in the first place.
It should be clarified that I am a traditional Orthodox Christian Monarchist, not a National Socialist, and that my positions reflect those of Imperial Russia. Below are two books, “The Story of the Russian Land” by Alexander Dimitrevich Nechvolodov, and “Reflections of a Russian Statesman” by Konstantin Petrovich Pobedonostsev, both of whom were influential figures in late Imperial Russia.
Consistent within the framework of traditional Eastern Orthodox theology, my writing upholds the traditional panentheistc worldview where God is both immanent and transcendent, God is not bound by natural processes, God may intervene directly in creation without being restricted by secondary causes, and that the natural order is contingent, not autonomous, and thus miracles and divine interventions are not violations of “laws” but expressions of God’s will within a created and upheld order. God is not dependent on mechanistic or uniformitarian processes, the world is not a closed causal system, there is no need for metaphysical naturalism—one can take St. Basil’s “Hexaemeron” literally or analogically—and that creation possesses logoi (divine ideas) rooted in the Logos (Christ).
In short, the world has divine intentionality, and the processes of the world are not self-sufficient but depend on God from moment-to-moment. I do not espouse metaphysical Enlightenment-based foundational myths for modern secular ideologies promoting a universe devoid of inherent purpose or divine order.
I will leave it here for those interested in thinking it through on their own terms.
Neofugue
boosted
@plotinus_enjoyer Your concern for safeguarding divine unity is fine, but the problem is assuming simplicity means every divine name must refer to one indivisible act or content. Assuming a Thomistic definition of simplicity, that “all God’s attributes are really identical,” and then restating it as if we somehow agree on this definition, is the problem, because that is precisely what Palamas, the Cappadocians Fathers and Dionysius rejected—it is Neoplatonic fatalism dressed in Latin terminology.
Regarding Dionysius and the Cappadocians, in DN 1.6-1.9 he refers to the divine names as the divine processions, not the essence itself, unified in their source, plural in manifestation. Translations of the Cappadocians into English vary by the perspective of the translator, but the word used by the Fathers is “energeia.” Other translations from a non-Orthodox standpoint generally use the word “operations” to uphold Thomism.
Barlaam’s error is separating creation from God by reducing divine action to created effects, whereas the Fathers taught that God is really present in His energies without the essence undergoing division or change. If you collapse everything into the essence, you remove real communion and turn God into a static monad. Names like “merciful,” “just,” and “creator” describe not simply concepts of the essence but real uncreated energies, ways in which God is present and acts in the world without compromising His transcendent essence. Barlaam’s mistake is him separating creation from God because he reduced divine action to create effects while the Fathers taught that God is really present in His energies without the essence undergoing division or change.
RT: https://poa.st/objects/c97a6d45-9247-43ea-9729-4237e5bf5ab2
Regarding Dionysius and the Cappadocians, in DN 1.6-1.9 he refers to the divine names as the divine processions, not the essence itself, unified in their source, plural in manifestation. Translations of the Cappadocians into English vary by the perspective of the translator, but the word used by the Fathers is “energeia.” Other translations from a non-Orthodox standpoint generally use the word “operations” to uphold Thomism.
Barlaam’s error is separating creation from God by reducing divine action to created effects, whereas the Fathers taught that God is really present in His energies without the essence undergoing division or change. If you collapse everything into the essence, you remove real communion and turn God into a static monad. Names like “merciful,” “just,” and “creator” describe not simply concepts of the essence but real uncreated energies, ways in which God is present and acts in the world without compromising His transcendent essence. Barlaam’s mistake is him separating creation from God because he reduced divine action to create effects while the Fathers taught that God is really present in His energies without the essence undergoing division or change.
RT: https://poa.st/objects/c97a6d45-9247-43ea-9729-4237e5bf5ab2
Neofugue
boosted
@plotinus_enjoyer To reduce divine simplicity to mere inseparability would be insufficient as reducing divine personhood to function, but Thomist actus purus is not what Orthodoxy teaches. Orthodoxy teaches simplicity without confusion or fusion, without collapsing distinctions, that protects apophaticism and personal communion.
We uphold divine simplicity; God has no composition or created parts, but we reject the Thomist model that all divine attributes are identified with the essence. Real distinctions between the divine energies are necessary for coherent theology, liturgical worship, and the theophanies in Scripture.
Western models confuse metaphysical simplicity with metaphysical identity, collapsing God's acts into the divine essence. Regarding Dionysius, and later Maximos and Palamas, these names are not merely conceptual descriptions but real manifestations—energies—of God. These are uncreated and truly God, yet distinct from the essence which remains absolutely unknowable.
The names do not refer to the exact same content because that would collapse God's love, justice, power, et cetera, into a monadic simplicity devoid of actual distinctions—which ironically enough—this is rooted in Neoplatonism, not Orthodox theosis, where the divine names are merely conceptual "aspects" of the essence, reducing the names to mental constructs rather than affirming them as real divine activities.
To put this into layman's terms, God's divine providence and love are not identical to God's wrath and judgment, God's eternal nature is not identical to His act of creation (the former example distinct uncreated energies, in the latter example His will is an uncreated energy).
RT: https://poa.st/objects/928a00c0-55c4-4fe7-8f0b-7100005b6235
We uphold divine simplicity; God has no composition or created parts, but we reject the Thomist model that all divine attributes are identified with the essence. Real distinctions between the divine energies are necessary for coherent theology, liturgical worship, and the theophanies in Scripture.
Western models confuse metaphysical simplicity with metaphysical identity, collapsing God's acts into the divine essence. Regarding Dionysius, and later Maximos and Palamas, these names are not merely conceptual descriptions but real manifestations—energies—of God. These are uncreated and truly God, yet distinct from the essence which remains absolutely unknowable.
The names do not refer to the exact same content because that would collapse God's love, justice, power, et cetera, into a monadic simplicity devoid of actual distinctions—which ironically enough—this is rooted in Neoplatonism, not Orthodox theosis, where the divine names are merely conceptual "aspects" of the essence, reducing the names to mental constructs rather than affirming them as real divine activities.
To put this into layman's terms, God's divine providence and love are not identical to God's wrath and judgment, God's eternal nature is not identical to His act of creation (the former example distinct uncreated energies, in the latter example His will is an uncreated energy).
RT: https://poa.st/objects/928a00c0-55c4-4fe7-8f0b-7100005b6235
Neofugue
boosted
@plotinus_enjoyer On the subject of simplicity, and in particular the Western Thomistic view of absolute divine simplicity:
In response to the analogy comparing God’s simplicity to the inseparability of a circle’s radius and circumference, this analogy falls short when applied to divine simplicity. God’s simplicity is not analogous to physical or geometric simplicity, rather Orthodox tradition upholds that God is simple in essence but reveals Himself through uncreated energies which are distinct yet not separate from His essence, allowing for real communion with God without compromising His transcendence.
The problem with ADS is that it conflates God’s essence with His actions and attributes, resulting in a form of modalism (God creating the world is not synonymous with the Divine Essence, as it would mean God is eternally creating the world). Regarding Dionysius the Areopagite, while Dionysius emphasizes God’s simplicity, he also acknowledges the multiplicity of divine names and energies, which supports the idea that God’s essence remains transcendent and unknowable while His energies are the means by which He manifests.
Within the Orthodox framework, the divine logoi (forms) are understood as uncreated energies that exist within the divine mind—this aligns with the Eastern Fathers who saw the logoi as the principles through which God creates and sustains the world, allowing for a participatory relationship between the Creator and Creation.
Side note unrelated to what @plotinus_enjoyer mentioned, “uniformitarianism” is not one of the logoi, so all unjustified sciences can be rejected a priori of their false claims.
You were partially correct in sensing that Dyer sees the Platonic forms as having a participatory relationship with a higher essence—but in Dyer’s reading (following St. Maximos), the forms exist within the divine Logos—Plato approximated the Orthodox understanding albeit lacking full revelation. Dyer’s interpretation of Plato points towards a metaphysical Logos that finds its fulfillment in Orthodox Christian theology, not that he endorses autonomous philosophical systems. Plato anticipates elements of the Logos—that the logoi are not abstracted impersonal principles but are rooted in a higher unifying reality akin to the Logos of St. John and the Cappadocians.
To say Dyer is a secular coherentist is a category error as he rejects the autonomy of human reason, the Enlightenment project—the false idea that man's gifts are independent of God's beneficence. Plato gestures towards an intelligible world structured by logoi but lacks the full light of revelation, which the Orthodox Church uniquely preserves through the essence-energies distinction. Plato approximates a participatory metaphysic where the many are rooted in the One, alter fulfilled in Christ the Logos. The Orthodox reading of the logoi with the divine energies preserves divine simplicity without collapsing God’s will and essence into indistinct identity as we see in the West.
Regarding Plato’s sun metaphor from the Republic Book VI, the “absence” of the One from the divided line is deliberate, showing its radical transcendence—something that Orthodox theology preserves by distinguishing between the the One or Good and in this case truth, beauty, justice et cetera. Thus Plato’s Good prefigures the Orthodox doctrine that we partake in God without ever comprehending the divine essence.
RT: https://poa.st/objects/d970294b-0f8d-40ab-8406-35b398817743
In response to the analogy comparing God’s simplicity to the inseparability of a circle’s radius and circumference, this analogy falls short when applied to divine simplicity. God’s simplicity is not analogous to physical or geometric simplicity, rather Orthodox tradition upholds that God is simple in essence but reveals Himself through uncreated energies which are distinct yet not separate from His essence, allowing for real communion with God without compromising His transcendence.
The problem with ADS is that it conflates God’s essence with His actions and attributes, resulting in a form of modalism (God creating the world is not synonymous with the Divine Essence, as it would mean God is eternally creating the world). Regarding Dionysius the Areopagite, while Dionysius emphasizes God’s simplicity, he also acknowledges the multiplicity of divine names and energies, which supports the idea that God’s essence remains transcendent and unknowable while His energies are the means by which He manifests.
Within the Orthodox framework, the divine logoi (forms) are understood as uncreated energies that exist within the divine mind—this aligns with the Eastern Fathers who saw the logoi as the principles through which God creates and sustains the world, allowing for a participatory relationship between the Creator and Creation.
Side note unrelated to what @plotinus_enjoyer mentioned, “uniformitarianism” is not one of the logoi, so all unjustified sciences can be rejected a priori of their false claims.
You were partially correct in sensing that Dyer sees the Platonic forms as having a participatory relationship with a higher essence—but in Dyer’s reading (following St. Maximos), the forms exist within the divine Logos—Plato approximated the Orthodox understanding albeit lacking full revelation. Dyer’s interpretation of Plato points towards a metaphysical Logos that finds its fulfillment in Orthodox Christian theology, not that he endorses autonomous philosophical systems. Plato anticipates elements of the Logos—that the logoi are not abstracted impersonal principles but are rooted in a higher unifying reality akin to the Logos of St. John and the Cappadocians.
To say Dyer is a secular coherentist is a category error as he rejects the autonomy of human reason, the Enlightenment project—the false idea that man's gifts are independent of God's beneficence. Plato gestures towards an intelligible world structured by logoi but lacks the full light of revelation, which the Orthodox Church uniquely preserves through the essence-energies distinction. Plato approximates a participatory metaphysic where the many are rooted in the One, alter fulfilled in Christ the Logos. The Orthodox reading of the logoi with the divine energies preserves divine simplicity without collapsing God’s will and essence into indistinct identity as we see in the West.
Regarding Plato’s sun metaphor from the Republic Book VI, the “absence” of the One from the divided line is deliberate, showing its radical transcendence—something that Orthodox theology preserves by distinguishing between the the One or Good and in this case truth, beauty, justice et cetera. Thus Plato’s Good prefigures the Orthodox doctrine that we partake in God without ever comprehending the divine essence.
RT: https://poa.st/objects/d970294b-0f8d-40ab-8406-35b398817743
Neofugue
boosted
@plotinus_enjoyer Apologies for necroposting, but here it goes.
Before I begin, I would like to apologize for being rather uncharitable and not nice during our last discussion. If you do not have me muted, the reasons I bring up this post again is for bring back dialogue and for discussion of Saint Augustine.
Regarding the positions of St. Augustine that would later become relevant with the arrival of the Great Schism, regarding filioque and predestination in particular, critique from the early Fathers, with the notable exception of St. Photius the Great on Augustine’s views on the Filioque, is largely absent because of differences in communication—terminology, emphasis, and theological method, not necessarily open rejection.
For example, St. Maximos defends St. Augustine on the basis of his critics not understanding his intentions:
“What they (Eastern critics) consider heretical is not his intention, but their misunderstanding of his expressions.” — Ambigua 5, PG 91:1088B
The Latin West prioritized realism in doctrine, ontological realism, inward transformation, psychological analogy, logical precision, while the Eastern Fathers preferred mystical expression, analogical language, and apophatic theology (describing what God is not), with an emphasis on liturgical, cosmic, and deifying (theotic (theosis)) aspects of salvation. The Great Schism was in many ways caused by the Western Church adopting an extreme Augustinian interpretation of grace, predestination, and divine simplicity in ways St. Maximos said St. Augustine was not advocating.
With regards to essence/energies, I stated back then our position that distinction does not equal division in our system (the Father is not the Son does not mean the Trinity is composed of parts), so there is not much more to say there.
However, what is your approach to these issues, just for better communication? I would like to know, are you still a Pagan as used to be on your profile, or have you changed your position?
RT: https://poa.st/objects/04bad389-90cd-43f2-8d73-b7f23e20c721
Before I begin, I would like to apologize for being rather uncharitable and not nice during our last discussion. If you do not have me muted, the reasons I bring up this post again is for bring back dialogue and for discussion of Saint Augustine.
Regarding the positions of St. Augustine that would later become relevant with the arrival of the Great Schism, regarding filioque and predestination in particular, critique from the early Fathers, with the notable exception of St. Photius the Great on Augustine’s views on the Filioque, is largely absent because of differences in communication—terminology, emphasis, and theological method, not necessarily open rejection.
For example, St. Maximos defends St. Augustine on the basis of his critics not understanding his intentions:
“What they (Eastern critics) consider heretical is not his intention, but their misunderstanding of his expressions.” — Ambigua 5, PG 91:1088B
The Latin West prioritized realism in doctrine, ontological realism, inward transformation, psychological analogy, logical precision, while the Eastern Fathers preferred mystical expression, analogical language, and apophatic theology (describing what God is not), with an emphasis on liturgical, cosmic, and deifying (theotic (theosis)) aspects of salvation. The Great Schism was in many ways caused by the Western Church adopting an extreme Augustinian interpretation of grace, predestination, and divine simplicity in ways St. Maximos said St. Augustine was not advocating.
With regards to essence/energies, I stated back then our position that distinction does not equal division in our system (the Father is not the Son does not mean the Trinity is composed of parts), so there is not much more to say there.
However, what is your approach to these issues, just for better communication? I would like to know, are you still a Pagan as used to be on your profile, or have you changed your position?
RT: https://poa.st/objects/04bad389-90cd-43f2-8d73-b7f23e20c721
Neofugue
boosted
@Starprophet The jews fear the White man becoming sentient, rising up from his subjugated state and realizing he can fight and win against his oppressors.
Which is why they spend enormous amounts of money on keeping any based Christian out of power and authority in any church above 5,000 members. From my experience in the Orthodox Church, the enemy gives corrupt priests well-paying sinecures at quasi-governmental institutions in insurance or healthcare, keeping these figures independent of church contributions.
To flip the question, if atheistic scientific racialism is such a threat, why is Clarence Darrow (an obvious reference to the Scopes Monkey Trial, not his involvement with the ACLU) shoved down everyone’s throat from secondary school onwards?
Neither you nor Dread (the latter has not the guts to address me directly) have addressed the key point, that the rational response to atheistic scientific racialism is to submit, serving one’s immediate “darwinian” self-interest. Atheistic scientific racialism alone fails because it is amoral.
For clarification, my position on these issues are in line with traditional Christianity. The Jews were once a great race that built the Temple and produced the Messiah, but having rejected Him continually over the last two millennia have devolved into their current state. The African peoples similarly devolved from a once noble state, this time on account of geography, with a similar trajectory to peoples in Oceania. Jews are not entirely a “parasitic subspecies” like “ticks,” nor are Africans entirely “nonhuman” like the primates they are compared with. These fallen and lesser peoples carry with them undesirable traits, which should be weeded out, but we do not accept the idea that “not everything with a face is human."
The lesson that the jews must be kept from power does not rely on “atheistic scientific darwinism,” that lesson—that the jews must be subjugated and jewish power destroyed—was clear from the Second Russian Revolution onwards. It is the Second Russian Revolution because the jews were not the one who overthrew the Tsar, sent him and his family into Siberia, purged the military of Tsarist officers, lost the First World War, and dissolved Third Rome. The nobleman who convinced Tsar Nicholas II to abdicate was a Russian, who fell just like the jews before him.
If my position does not make me enough of an enemy of the jews, then that is your opinion.
It is not necessary to believe that one’s enemy is a foot fungus or a “nonhuman with a face" to fight him. However, it is necessary to believe in the goodness of self-sacrifice in order to fight the enemy in the first place. If Elon Musk believes that the jews are a "parasitic subspecies," the jews are not going to be happy about it, but what matters are his conclusions—if all it means is that now he serves them out of immediate self-interest, then they are going to begrudgingly accept it so long as he keeps it private.
It is more likely that I will get men to fight and die to purge academia of all false sciences than it is for you to get men to fight and die to convince their daughters not to be evil.
RE: https://detroitriotcity.com/objects/ce2b90a4-30f5-4f41-ba7a-54f7b2ac6a31
Which is why they spend enormous amounts of money on keeping any based Christian out of power and authority in any church above 5,000 members. From my experience in the Orthodox Church, the enemy gives corrupt priests well-paying sinecures at quasi-governmental institutions in insurance or healthcare, keeping these figures independent of church contributions.
To flip the question, if atheistic scientific racialism is such a threat, why is Clarence Darrow (an obvious reference to the Scopes Monkey Trial, not his involvement with the ACLU) shoved down everyone’s throat from secondary school onwards?
Neither you nor Dread (the latter has not the guts to address me directly) have addressed the key point, that the rational response to atheistic scientific racialism is to submit, serving one’s immediate “darwinian” self-interest. Atheistic scientific racialism alone fails because it is amoral.
For clarification, my position on these issues are in line with traditional Christianity. The Jews were once a great race that built the Temple and produced the Messiah, but having rejected Him continually over the last two millennia have devolved into their current state. The African peoples similarly devolved from a once noble state, this time on account of geography, with a similar trajectory to peoples in Oceania. Jews are not entirely a “parasitic subspecies” like “ticks,” nor are Africans entirely “nonhuman” like the primates they are compared with. These fallen and lesser peoples carry with them undesirable traits, which should be weeded out, but we do not accept the idea that “not everything with a face is human."
The lesson that the jews must be kept from power does not rely on “atheistic scientific darwinism,” that lesson—that the jews must be subjugated and jewish power destroyed—was clear from the Second Russian Revolution onwards. It is the Second Russian Revolution because the jews were not the one who overthrew the Tsar, sent him and his family into Siberia, purged the military of Tsarist officers, lost the First World War, and dissolved Third Rome. The nobleman who convinced Tsar Nicholas II to abdicate was a Russian, who fell just like the jews before him.
If my position does not make me enough of an enemy of the jews, then that is your opinion.
It is not necessary to believe that one’s enemy is a foot fungus or a “nonhuman with a face" to fight him. However, it is necessary to believe in the goodness of self-sacrifice in order to fight the enemy in the first place. If Elon Musk believes that the jews are a "parasitic subspecies," the jews are not going to be happy about it, but what matters are his conclusions—if all it means is that now he serves them out of immediate self-interest, then they are going to begrudgingly accept it so long as he keeps it private.
It is more likely that I will get men to fight and die to purge academia of all false sciences than it is for you to get men to fight and die to convince their daughters not to be evil.
RE: https://detroitriotcity.com/objects/ce2b90a4-30f5-4f41-ba7a-54f7b2ac6a31
Starprophet (@Starprophet@detroitriotcity.com)detroitriotcity.com
Neofugue
boosted
@StarProphet
There is a running inside joke that Jay Dyer is a KGB sorcerer.
But in all seriousness, my issue regarding scientific darwinist racialism more of a meta-level critique, that human beings require something more than just being "correct" to act against their immediate self-interests.
Speaking as a fallen member of the near-elite, the issue is not that people simply "do not know," as if the jew is simply "tricking" the White man into submission. Most elite Leftists understand that the ulitmate goal of the enemy is to eliminate the White races—only that they welcome it openly. The "survival instinct" of a defeated people is to submit and assimilate, not to fight back against all odds, and most choose submission over resistance.
Think about how most so-called "Christians" send their unmarried daughters to college. Do these people, all of them, simply not know what happens? Of course not, they do it because finding and pairing suitors is difficult, homeschooling is difficult, defying polite society is difficult, and American McChristianity is Antinomian—no one resists unless believing that God will hold them accountable for evil.
Men fight and die for God, King, and Country. America as of now has no king; Trump was the closest we had and he failed in 2020. White America could in theory serve as "country" in this case—however, at this time American Whites are in effect a subjugated, divided and defeated people.
The only thing men will voluntarily self-sacrifice for at this current time is God, that is, if the faith is pure, traditional, and uncompromising, based on the Church of the first 1000 years of Christendom.
At this moment, which of the following actions is easier for us to accomplish?
A. To raise his daughter to be a virgin bride, to homeschool her, to find a decent and respectable man for her, and to compel her to marry when she comes of age.
or...
B. To get the various ethnic and cultural groups of subjugated White America to unite and rise up against the Jews and either expel or exterminate them, all without any significant military, financial, or cultural institutions to defeat them.
Atheistic darwinian racialism is unsuitable because no one will take action to achieve the first objective ever. No one who sincerely believes in it practices the kind of morality in the first objective because atheistic darwinian racialism is amoral and no one who believes in it understands the necessity for self-sacrifice. "Res ipsa loquitur"
The underlying meta-level issue is that secular Natural Law fails as one cannot derive an "ought" from an "is." Even if atheistic scientific racialist darwinism is "correct," I am still under no obligation to risk everything to save the White race. The only thing that matters, or perhaps something at least of equal importance, is my immediate darwinian interest, which means not fighting the enemy currently in charge.
If one wishes for the White man to become sentient, it is necessary to provide a spiritual basis for martyrdom, to fight and die for a just cause. It is more likely that someone will fight and die for the purpose of gutting the unjustified sciences for God, then that someone will risk life and death to fight for "science," "racialism," "darwin," among other such amoral nonsense.
Even Hitler himself understood that in order to win, you must get your followers to throw themselves into the fire just like Brünhilde in "Götterdämmerung:"
https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=jxDJ3ixLX6Q
No one who fought for Hitler did so for "science," "darwin," and "racialism," they died for "God," "Fuhrer," and "Germany," including Hitler himself, a fan of the great composer.
RE: https://noauthority.social/@StarProphet/114523781391493248
There is a running inside joke that Jay Dyer is a KGB sorcerer.
But in all seriousness, my issue regarding scientific darwinist racialism more of a meta-level critique, that human beings require something more than just being "correct" to act against their immediate self-interests.
Speaking as a fallen member of the near-elite, the issue is not that people simply "do not know," as if the jew is simply "tricking" the White man into submission. Most elite Leftists understand that the ulitmate goal of the enemy is to eliminate the White races—only that they welcome it openly. The "survival instinct" of a defeated people is to submit and assimilate, not to fight back against all odds, and most choose submission over resistance.
Think about how most so-called "Christians" send their unmarried daughters to college. Do these people, all of them, simply not know what happens? Of course not, they do it because finding and pairing suitors is difficult, homeschooling is difficult, defying polite society is difficult, and American McChristianity is Antinomian—no one resists unless believing that God will hold them accountable for evil.
Men fight and die for God, King, and Country. America as of now has no king; Trump was the closest we had and he failed in 2020. White America could in theory serve as "country" in this case—however, at this time American Whites are in effect a subjugated, divided and defeated people.
The only thing men will voluntarily self-sacrifice for at this current time is God, that is, if the faith is pure, traditional, and uncompromising, based on the Church of the first 1000 years of Christendom.
At this moment, which of the following actions is easier for us to accomplish?
A. To raise his daughter to be a virgin bride, to homeschool her, to find a decent and respectable man for her, and to compel her to marry when she comes of age.
or...
B. To get the various ethnic and cultural groups of subjugated White America to unite and rise up against the Jews and either expel or exterminate them, all without any significant military, financial, or cultural institutions to defeat them.
Atheistic darwinian racialism is unsuitable because no one will take action to achieve the first objective ever. No one who sincerely believes in it practices the kind of morality in the first objective because atheistic darwinian racialism is amoral and no one who believes in it understands the necessity for self-sacrifice. "Res ipsa loquitur"
The underlying meta-level issue is that secular Natural Law fails as one cannot derive an "ought" from an "is." Even if atheistic scientific racialist darwinism is "correct," I am still under no obligation to risk everything to save the White race. The only thing that matters, or perhaps something at least of equal importance, is my immediate darwinian interest, which means not fighting the enemy currently in charge.
If one wishes for the White man to become sentient, it is necessary to provide a spiritual basis for martyrdom, to fight and die for a just cause. It is more likely that someone will fight and die for the purpose of gutting the unjustified sciences for God, then that someone will risk life and death to fight for "science," "racialism," "darwin," among other such amoral nonsense.
Even Hitler himself understood that in order to win, you must get your followers to throw themselves into the fire just like Brünhilde in "Götterdämmerung:"
https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=jxDJ3ixLX6Q
No one who fought for Hitler did so for "science," "darwin," and "racialism," they died for "God," "Fuhrer," and "Germany," including Hitler himself, a fan of the great composer.
RE: https://noauthority.social/@StarProphet/114523781391493248
Neofugue
boosted
@StarProphet
Most right-wing dissidents miss the forest for the trees.
Without a firm belief in God, there is no real reason to save the higher races in the first place. To use the kikes as an analogy, why does parasitism necessarily mean that one life form has more of a “right” to live as opposed to another life form; in this case, why does the inherent nature of the kikes make them “life unworthy of life” compared to in this case Whites who are “worthy of life?”
Is it beauty? Is it culture? Is it dignity? Is it pride? Is it technology? Is it rockets?
All of these higher goals point to the divine in some way or another, because without God, there is simply no reason why we should care about any of the above in anything other than a purely utilitarian sense.
This is the question which got me in trouble with Jim’s Blog.
The greatness of the White race is because of Christianity, because while colder temperatures select for higher intelligence to a degree, the greatness of the European peoples lies in their accomplishments—culture, arts, technology, et cetera, all of which require “the nerd” i.e. monogamy. Colder temperatures can select for general intelligence and lighter skin color, but the White man was not dignified by his own nature but by the society that God gave him. There is no Newton or Bach without the institution of Christian monogamy. Even aesthetic beauty requires the most beautiful women of each generation not to be hoarded but distributed.
Sure, it is true that videos on Creationism are allowed on YT, such as Jay Dyer’s videos on the subject, while videos on niggers and kikes are banned, but the only reason why videos on niggers and kikes are banned is because many in the West still cling to things like beauty, culture, dignity, sanctity, and so forth.
If no one believed in Christianity, if the West was entirely atheistic, the kikes could allow all such videos on their platforms because without God, there is no reason to say that the natures of the nigger and the kike are such that it is our moral imperative to destroy these peoples. Everybody already knows the truth about kikes and niggers, including well-educated Leftists who complain about high rents while living in nigger-free neighborhoods. My hometown voted ~80% for the nigger pajeet whore last year, yet there was only one token black in my graduation class, roughly only 2 black families in the entire area.
I am reminded of a post made by John Young regarding a couple of women who proceeded to go out with kikes after being told the jewish question. In a purely atheistic "rational" sense, the most beneficial action is not to resist but to submit to the enemy.
There is no reason to act against one's immediate self-interest if one is invoking something he does not truly believe in. Does Jim of Jim's Blog believe in Christianity? Of course not.
RE: https://noauthority.social/@StarProphet/114515332238687783
Most right-wing dissidents miss the forest for the trees.
Without a firm belief in God, there is no real reason to save the higher races in the first place. To use the kikes as an analogy, why does parasitism necessarily mean that one life form has more of a “right” to live as opposed to another life form; in this case, why does the inherent nature of the kikes make them “life unworthy of life” compared to in this case Whites who are “worthy of life?”
Is it beauty? Is it culture? Is it dignity? Is it pride? Is it technology? Is it rockets?
All of these higher goals point to the divine in some way or another, because without God, there is simply no reason why we should care about any of the above in anything other than a purely utilitarian sense.
This is the question which got me in trouble with Jim’s Blog.
The greatness of the White race is because of Christianity, because while colder temperatures select for higher intelligence to a degree, the greatness of the European peoples lies in their accomplishments—culture, arts, technology, et cetera, all of which require “the nerd” i.e. monogamy. Colder temperatures can select for general intelligence and lighter skin color, but the White man was not dignified by his own nature but by the society that God gave him. There is no Newton or Bach without the institution of Christian monogamy. Even aesthetic beauty requires the most beautiful women of each generation not to be hoarded but distributed.
Sure, it is true that videos on Creationism are allowed on YT, such as Jay Dyer’s videos on the subject, while videos on niggers and kikes are banned, but the only reason why videos on niggers and kikes are banned is because many in the West still cling to things like beauty, culture, dignity, sanctity, and so forth.
If no one believed in Christianity, if the West was entirely atheistic, the kikes could allow all such videos on their platforms because without God, there is no reason to say that the natures of the nigger and the kike are such that it is our moral imperative to destroy these peoples. Everybody already knows the truth about kikes and niggers, including well-educated Leftists who complain about high rents while living in nigger-free neighborhoods. My hometown voted ~80% for the nigger pajeet whore last year, yet there was only one token black in my graduation class, roughly only 2 black families in the entire area.
I am reminded of a post made by John Young regarding a couple of women who proceeded to go out with kikes after being told the jewish question. In a purely atheistic "rational" sense, the most beneficial action is not to resist but to submit to the enemy.
There is no reason to act against one's immediate self-interest if one is invoking something he does not truly believe in. Does Jim of Jim's Blog believe in Christianity? Of course not.
RE: https://noauthority.social/@StarProphet/114515332238687783
Neofugue
boosted
Christ is risen!!!
Truly he is risen!!!
Wishing all those reading this a Happy and Glorious Easter!!! While my post is late, as of the time of writing it is still Bright Week, a week of celebration of the Savior who conquered death by death!
In this age, it is often difficult to maintain optimism in the midst of countless setbacks. Surveying what is left of a movement that once held so much promise, it is difficult to find many of the remaining Alt-Right figures not presently blackpilling their dwindling audiences. Andrew Anglin, once the most influential figure in the Dissident Right, has put his website on hiatus for the foreseeable future.
It is also a noteworthy coincidence that Easter Sunday this year falls on the same day as Adolf Hitler’s birthday, a man as important as he is tragic.
The question is how can one can cling to hope and remain whitepilled when everything looks to have been in vain.
On the surface, it seems impossible to view Hitler and his attempt to save Germany as anything other than a monumental tragedy. Losing the war not only brought death and destruction to Germany, it also cemented the creation of the new world order. That said, as it becomes clear, God was with the German people until the end.
This is not to say that it was possible for Germany to with the Second World War, given that Hitler had to defeat the United States, Great Britain and the Soviet Union at the same time without comparable manpower, resources and industry. Germany fought as best as she could, but no amount of German courage could have defeated 20,000,000 men, 100,000 tanks and 10,000 heavy bombers.
When reflecting on Germany’s fate in the broader context of history, the surprising element is not that she was defeated rather that she was spared. Seldom mentioned by mainstream historians, Germany was supposed to have been destroyed with the implementation of the Morgenthau plan under Roosevelt following the conclusion of the war, which called for the permanent partition and deindustrialization of Germany and all of her military-age men sent to die in Siberia.
National Socialist Germany collapsed at the right time:
If Germany fell before 1945, the Soviets would have had control over all of Germany.
If Germany fell even a month earlier, German occupation would have been managed by Roosevelt's administration as opposed to the more moderate one under Truman.
If Germany resisted for another few months, Germany would have faced nuclear annihilation and the more advanced American bombers that befell the Japanese.
If Germany was not partitioned, the geopolitical pressure of the Cold War would not have forced both sides to ease punishing Germany.
If Germany was not caught up in the Cold War, none of the millions of German POWs sent to Siberia by Roosevelt would have been sent back home.
To ask a more extreme question, if there continued to remain a significant Jewish population in Germany following the Second World War, would any of the German POWs sent East have returned home at all under Adenauer?
It should also be noted that Stalin only stopped his killings of Orthodox Christians in favor of making a deal with Metropolitan Sergius because of Hitler’s invasion of the USSR, and were it not for Hitler's invasion, it is unlikely that the Soviet Union would have collapsed considering that the Soviet Union never fully recovered from the war.
The greatest sin that haunts Adolf Hitler and his legacy to this day was neither his rise nor his fall, rather that at the final hour, Hitler chose to give up and take his own life rather than dying a martyr’s death. Hitler’s death should have emulated Saint Lazar of Serbia, for though Saint Lazar fell at the Battle of Kosovo, his death made the soul of his people immortal for though Ottoman domination was inevitable, his martyrdom meant that the faith of the Serbian people was saved forever.
The ill spirit of Hitler's final act should not be emulated. Anglin is the most important and influential figure of the Dissident Right in the 21st century and his work provides the foundation for many new rising figures in the movement, and he should not give up on his mission. It is clear that the original intent for the Stormer, the creation of a revolutionary media company, is over, but daily news is not the only path for a man with Anglin's talents. Turning the Daily Stormer into a weekly or monthly Substack-type blog or a platform for weekly podcasts might be a good way to turn things around. However, if the Daily Stormer is to end, it should be a good end on a good note, for a great and influential website authored by a great and influential figure deserves a great end, whatever that end may be.
As the Lord said, “With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.”
[Second icon of St. Lazar of Serbia]
@DailyStormerDigest
Truly he is risen!!!
Wishing all those reading this a Happy and Glorious Easter!!! While my post is late, as of the time of writing it is still Bright Week, a week of celebration of the Savior who conquered death by death!
In this age, it is often difficult to maintain optimism in the midst of countless setbacks. Surveying what is left of a movement that once held so much promise, it is difficult to find many of the remaining Alt-Right figures not presently blackpilling their dwindling audiences. Andrew Anglin, once the most influential figure in the Dissident Right, has put his website on hiatus for the foreseeable future.
It is also a noteworthy coincidence that Easter Sunday this year falls on the same day as Adolf Hitler’s birthday, a man as important as he is tragic.
The question is how can one can cling to hope and remain whitepilled when everything looks to have been in vain.
On the surface, it seems impossible to view Hitler and his attempt to save Germany as anything other than a monumental tragedy. Losing the war not only brought death and destruction to Germany, it also cemented the creation of the new world order. That said, as it becomes clear, God was with the German people until the end.
This is not to say that it was possible for Germany to with the Second World War, given that Hitler had to defeat the United States, Great Britain and the Soviet Union at the same time without comparable manpower, resources and industry. Germany fought as best as she could, but no amount of German courage could have defeated 20,000,000 men, 100,000 tanks and 10,000 heavy bombers.
When reflecting on Germany’s fate in the broader context of history, the surprising element is not that she was defeated rather that she was spared. Seldom mentioned by mainstream historians, Germany was supposed to have been destroyed with the implementation of the Morgenthau plan under Roosevelt following the conclusion of the war, which called for the permanent partition and deindustrialization of Germany and all of her military-age men sent to die in Siberia.
National Socialist Germany collapsed at the right time:
If Germany fell before 1945, the Soviets would have had control over all of Germany.
If Germany fell even a month earlier, German occupation would have been managed by Roosevelt's administration as opposed to the more moderate one under Truman.
If Germany resisted for another few months, Germany would have faced nuclear annihilation and the more advanced American bombers that befell the Japanese.
If Germany was not partitioned, the geopolitical pressure of the Cold War would not have forced both sides to ease punishing Germany.
If Germany was not caught up in the Cold War, none of the millions of German POWs sent to Siberia by Roosevelt would have been sent back home.
To ask a more extreme question, if there continued to remain a significant Jewish population in Germany following the Second World War, would any of the German POWs sent East have returned home at all under Adenauer?
It should also be noted that Stalin only stopped his killings of Orthodox Christians in favor of making a deal with Metropolitan Sergius because of Hitler’s invasion of the USSR, and were it not for Hitler's invasion, it is unlikely that the Soviet Union would have collapsed considering that the Soviet Union never fully recovered from the war.
The greatest sin that haunts Adolf Hitler and his legacy to this day was neither his rise nor his fall, rather that at the final hour, Hitler chose to give up and take his own life rather than dying a martyr’s death. Hitler’s death should have emulated Saint Lazar of Serbia, for though Saint Lazar fell at the Battle of Kosovo, his death made the soul of his people immortal for though Ottoman domination was inevitable, his martyrdom meant that the faith of the Serbian people was saved forever.
The ill spirit of Hitler's final act should not be emulated. Anglin is the most important and influential figure of the Dissident Right in the 21st century and his work provides the foundation for many new rising figures in the movement, and he should not give up on his mission. It is clear that the original intent for the Stormer, the creation of a revolutionary media company, is over, but daily news is not the only path for a man with Anglin's talents. Turning the Daily Stormer into a weekly or monthly Substack-type blog or a platform for weekly podcasts might be a good way to turn things around. However, if the Daily Stormer is to end, it should be a good end on a good note, for a great and influential website authored by a great and influential figure deserves a great end, whatever that end may be.
As the Lord said, “With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.”
[Second icon of St. Lazar of Serbia]
@DailyStormerDigest
Neofugue
boosted
It is said that the Lone Star State is attempting to ban anime through the recent Texas Senate Bill 20.
This is yet another example of the modern American judicial system imposing yet another act of anarcho-tyranny, a political condition where the government is simultaneously ineffective at enforcing laws against criminal—or what should be criminal—behavior and overly oppressive against law-abiding citizens.
The way it works is the law is written as vague as possible to allow the judge to have a complete range of interpretation as to what constitutes an offense. The way the legal system works is why Donald Trump was charged with 40 offenses.
Obviously the state of Texas will not be banning anime anytime soon, as such a ban would simply be impossible to enforce. However, what it does mean is that if the State of Texas or any other state with similar laws decides that you are a threat, they have yet another option to put you away in jail for any number of years if they find an anime girl picture (let’s say of Asuka) on you.
However, I am certain that 95% of right-wing dissident fedi-users have committed some sort of “crime” (i.e. criminal hate speech) on this site according to some faggot kike nigger judge—this means me! So no worries; just keep all of this in mind if you get doxxed or go public for some misguided reason.
https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=Msiii4877fM
Bill 20.png
Yellow Rose of Texas.png
This is yet another example of the modern American judicial system imposing yet another act of anarcho-tyranny, a political condition where the government is simultaneously ineffective at enforcing laws against criminal—or what should be criminal—behavior and overly oppressive against law-abiding citizens.
The way it works is the law is written as vague as possible to allow the judge to have a complete range of interpretation as to what constitutes an offense. The way the legal system works is why Donald Trump was charged with 40 offenses.
Obviously the state of Texas will not be banning anime anytime soon, as such a ban would simply be impossible to enforce. However, what it does mean is that if the State of Texas or any other state with similar laws decides that you are a threat, they have yet another option to put you away in jail for any number of years if they find an anime girl picture (let’s say of Asuka) on you.
However, I am certain that 95% of right-wing dissident fedi-users have committed some sort of “crime” (i.e. criminal hate speech) on this site according to some faggot kike nigger judge—this means me! So no worries; just keep all of this in mind if you get doxxed or go public for some misguided reason.
https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=Msiii4877fM
Bill 20.png
Yellow Rose of Texas.png
Neofugue
boosted
@TrevorGoodchild Speaking as someone who has been around and worked with women and girls of all ages in my life, both in my family and outside, I can attest that most girls especially those from good families are born like this.
Remember that all girls are born virgins.
Then at around puberty they get exposed to slut culture (Taylor Swift, Disney, Twilight, etc.) by their friends, teachers, family, (((internet))), community, and they get the metaphorical timer that runs out when they are no longer virgins. When the timer runs out they transform into modern women i.e. feral animals, as modern hookup/dating culture is unnatural, uncivilized, barbaric and soul crushing, especially for young girls.
Until the necessary laws change, your number one priority as a father is to keep your daughters away from school (middle, high, college) and activities where they interact with girls not on the early-marriage-track, which means basically ALL of them minus social activities with the daughters of your close friends. Then your second priority is to find and prepare a man for her to marry when she is of legal age. Admittedly I have no experience with the second priority and anyone who has died long ago, but if you are ruthless enough it should be possible.
Homeschooling makes this path possible with the right amount of networking and subterfuge. If the regime bans homeschooling, however, then it is time to start [VOTING], just like Liam Neeson:
Taken.webp
RT: https://poa.st/objects/ea86873e-0b4c-44f5-b8aa-b1a9f3eb87eb
Remember that all girls are born virgins.
Then at around puberty they get exposed to slut culture (Taylor Swift, Disney, Twilight, etc.) by their friends, teachers, family, (((internet))), community, and they get the metaphorical timer that runs out when they are no longer virgins. When the timer runs out they transform into modern women i.e. feral animals, as modern hookup/dating culture is unnatural, uncivilized, barbaric and soul crushing, especially for young girls.
Until the necessary laws change, your number one priority as a father is to keep your daughters away from school (middle, high, college) and activities where they interact with girls not on the early-marriage-track, which means basically ALL of them minus social activities with the daughters of your close friends. Then your second priority is to find and prepare a man for her to marry when she is of legal age. Admittedly I have no experience with the second priority and anyone who has died long ago, but if you are ruthless enough it should be possible.
Homeschooling makes this path possible with the right amount of networking and subterfuge. If the regime bans homeschooling, however, then it is time to start [VOTING], just like Liam Neeson:
Taken.webp
RT: https://poa.st/objects/ea86873e-0b4c-44f5-b8aa-b1a9f3eb87eb
Neofugue
boosted
@plotinus_enjoyer Two main points to consider:
First point is that Saints in the Orthodox Church are saints by their virtue, not because they are infallible and always correct about every little detail. What matters is not what they say, but rather the spirit of what they say and how it fits within the complete total Orthodox system and worldview. So while we may not accept all of Saint Augustine’s theological propositions, we still respect and hold to most of what he said.
Second point is trying to fit Western secular logic into Orthodoxy is the origin of all heresy. Divine simplicity (DS), which is Orthodox, means in this case that we cannot know or understand the Divine Essence. ADS posits that anything we experience from God must be created, but the Orthodox understanding is that we can experience and take part in the real Divine Energies of God.
You comment on Divine Simplicity (DS) being no different from ADS is the inevitable conclusion using secular logic, but in our system we do not do dialectics. Just because Moses saw the Divine Energies and not the Divine Essence does not mean we say Moses did not see God, as the Charlton Heston movie would have you believe. Just because Christ had a human nature and a divine nature does not mean that he was two persons, or that Christ was created, or any other similar heresy.
Distinction does not entail division in our system, so our goal is not about finding a way to fit secular logic and models into our system, our goal is to redefine secular logic from the starting point of Revelation and incorporate it into Christianity. Just because God has a Divine Essence and Energies does not mean we believe He is with “separate parts”—we believe He has Simplicity, we just simply do not and can not under stand the Divine Essence and as such we are not justified in calling them distinct.
TL;DR: stop trying to fit Orthodoxy into secular "logic." There is a reason why we sent all the pagan philosophers into Persia.
First point is that Saints in the Orthodox Church are saints by their virtue, not because they are infallible and always correct about every little detail. What matters is not what they say, but rather the spirit of what they say and how it fits within the complete total Orthodox system and worldview. So while we may not accept all of Saint Augustine’s theological propositions, we still respect and hold to most of what he said.
Second point is trying to fit Western secular logic into Orthodoxy is the origin of all heresy. Divine simplicity (DS), which is Orthodox, means in this case that we cannot know or understand the Divine Essence. ADS posits that anything we experience from God must be created, but the Orthodox understanding is that we can experience and take part in the real Divine Energies of God.
You comment on Divine Simplicity (DS) being no different from ADS is the inevitable conclusion using secular logic, but in our system we do not do dialectics. Just because Moses saw the Divine Energies and not the Divine Essence does not mean we say Moses did not see God, as the Charlton Heston movie would have you believe. Just because Christ had a human nature and a divine nature does not mean that he was two persons, or that Christ was created, or any other similar heresy.
Distinction does not entail division in our system, so our goal is not about finding a way to fit secular logic and models into our system, our goal is to redefine secular logic from the starting point of Revelation and incorporate it into Christianity. Just because God has a Divine Essence and Energies does not mean we believe He is with “separate parts”—we believe He has Simplicity, we just simply do not and can not under stand the Divine Essence and as such we are not justified in calling them distinct.
TL;DR: stop trying to fit Orthodoxy into secular "logic." There is a reason why we sent all the pagan philosophers into Persia.
Neofugue
boosted
@judgedread You are too kind to the kikes. Kikes are the Mouth of Sauron. Going by Lord of the Rings, here are the races applied to our world:
Whites are an amalgamation of the Elves and Numenorians (ancient Aryans) and the Northmen and Middlemen (pre-Aryan Europeans). Aragorn is a direct descendant of Elros, the brother of Elrond, and the elite of Dol Amroth (elite region of Gondor) such as Imrahil (book, not film) are also part elvish. Aragorn is also one of the last remaining men of Numenor (which is why he has a longer lifespan), and Numenorian blood (though diluted) accounts for why Gondor is the most advanced nation of men in Middle Earth in the Third Age (compare Minas Tirith to Edoras).
The kikes are Dark Numenorians, a once high race that has been deformed both spiritually and physically by their worship of Sauron. In the Simarillion, the Dark Numenorians attempting to achieve immortality by conquering Valinor, the homeland of the elves, can be compared to the kikes attempting to achieve dominion through the extermination of the Aryan bloodline and the White race. The kikes are the Mouth of Sauron, one of the few remaining Dark Numenorians in the Third Age.
The orcs are the Whites twisted by the dark forces complicit in following Sauron’s will. Think the coalition of the fringes, the deviancy of Leftist groups like Antifa, the behavior of modern feral women—these people are animals living a degenerate and disgusting existence. While I am sympathetic to Russia regarding the current war in Ukraine, the Russians were the orcs of World War 2 being sacrificed in the millions (14 million Soviets died in WW2 according to David Glantz, not 8.9 million as officially claimed), and the Soviet Union acted as Mordor against Germany as Gondor. The conscript cannon fodder of the Civil War also were used in this manner, in particular the Irish who did not appreciate being sent to die for niggers.
The wicked men of Middle Earth such as the Easterlings and Haradrim are a slightly less deformed version of the orcs, such as certain groups of progressive Whites (Pacific Northwest, New England, Vermont, Colorado (excluding Massachusetts brahmins, they are Dark Numenorians like the kikes). The Nazgûl fall into this category. Note that before the film retconned the Southrons into Middle Easterners, the Southrons such as the Variags of Khand were originally based on Scandinavians.
There is no direct relation between our world and the Dwarves or Hobbits, though there are some similarities. Whites are warlike unlike Hobbits, and while there are mountain peoples of our race, our mountain people live above ground in the rolling hills and valleys of the mountains, not inside the mountains themselves.
Overall, Tolkien crafted each of the races of Middle Earth based on the characteristics of the ethnicities and castes found in Old Europe. It would be wrong to assume that orcs are niggers, as orcs were initially elves (and they can fight, unlike niggers), and it would also be too charitable to the kikes to assume that they are orcs, as they lack the basic martial honor of orcs to at least fight in battle.
Curtis Yarvin is an idiot for introducing Tolkien into modern political theory in this manner. Kikes are neither elves, nor orcs, they are Dark Numenorians like the Mouth of Sauron, twisted figures from a fallen race, and Aragorn showed us how exactly to deal with these figures (film, though the book version works as well).
Whites are an amalgamation of the Elves and Numenorians (ancient Aryans) and the Northmen and Middlemen (pre-Aryan Europeans). Aragorn is a direct descendant of Elros, the brother of Elrond, and the elite of Dol Amroth (elite region of Gondor) such as Imrahil (book, not film) are also part elvish. Aragorn is also one of the last remaining men of Numenor (which is why he has a longer lifespan), and Numenorian blood (though diluted) accounts for why Gondor is the most advanced nation of men in Middle Earth in the Third Age (compare Minas Tirith to Edoras).
The kikes are Dark Numenorians, a once high race that has been deformed both spiritually and physically by their worship of Sauron. In the Simarillion, the Dark Numenorians attempting to achieve immortality by conquering Valinor, the homeland of the elves, can be compared to the kikes attempting to achieve dominion through the extermination of the Aryan bloodline and the White race. The kikes are the Mouth of Sauron, one of the few remaining Dark Numenorians in the Third Age.
The orcs are the Whites twisted by the dark forces complicit in following Sauron’s will. Think the coalition of the fringes, the deviancy of Leftist groups like Antifa, the behavior of modern feral women—these people are animals living a degenerate and disgusting existence. While I am sympathetic to Russia regarding the current war in Ukraine, the Russians were the orcs of World War 2 being sacrificed in the millions (14 million Soviets died in WW2 according to David Glantz, not 8.9 million as officially claimed), and the Soviet Union acted as Mordor against Germany as Gondor. The conscript cannon fodder of the Civil War also were used in this manner, in particular the Irish who did not appreciate being sent to die for niggers.
The wicked men of Middle Earth such as the Easterlings and Haradrim are a slightly less deformed version of the orcs, such as certain groups of progressive Whites (Pacific Northwest, New England, Vermont, Colorado (excluding Massachusetts brahmins, they are Dark Numenorians like the kikes). The Nazgûl fall into this category. Note that before the film retconned the Southrons into Middle Easterners, the Southrons such as the Variags of Khand were originally based on Scandinavians.
There is no direct relation between our world and the Dwarves or Hobbits, though there are some similarities. Whites are warlike unlike Hobbits, and while there are mountain peoples of our race, our mountain people live above ground in the rolling hills and valleys of the mountains, not inside the mountains themselves.
Overall, Tolkien crafted each of the races of Middle Earth based on the characteristics of the ethnicities and castes found in Old Europe. It would be wrong to assume that orcs are niggers, as orcs were initially elves (and they can fight, unlike niggers), and it would also be too charitable to the kikes to assume that they are orcs, as they lack the basic martial honor of orcs to at least fight in battle.
Curtis Yarvin is an idiot for introducing Tolkien into modern political theory in this manner. Kikes are neither elves, nor orcs, they are Dark Numenorians like the Mouth of Sauron, twisted figures from a fallen race, and Aragorn showed us how exactly to deal with these figures (film, though the book version works as well).
The only thing worse than a white knight is a white knight who blames female misbehavior on the Jews:
https://dailystormer.in/toxic-femininity-manifest-as-political-tyranny/
Neofugue
boosted
@wizardmanperson @judgedread Time for a golf effortpost:
The biggest barrier of entry to golf is understanding not what happens on screen, but rather what happens off screen.
The challenge of golf is to hit a small white ball into a hole hundreds of yards away, and the winner is the one who gets the ball into the hole with the fewest number of shots. In order to achieve this, one must master several technical swings such as driving, approaches, chipping, putting, et cetera over a wide range of terrain types and, in the case of the Open Championship (British Open), a wide range of weather patterns.
However, the hardest challenge of golf is not in the technique but in the mental game. No matter how well one prepares for the technical aspect of the game, golf swings are made over long stretches of time and being consistent requires great mental strength. Even among champions, the element of “choking” can cause a great player to lose tournaments, such as Tom Watson in the 2009 Open Championship and Phil Mickelson across several US Opens.
One reason why businessmen appreciate the game, other than it being part of making deals and an activity meant to demonstrate status, is that the game requires immense mental focus, discipline and patience. Donald Trump hitting a solo birdie and eagle on a Break 50 video with US Open champion Bryson DeChambeau is impressive to a layman but even more impressive to those who have experience playing the game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Rb9b8rYhII
However, the key reason why golf is important to the elite, especially when making business deals, is that golf is a morality test. This test is referred to as “Golf Etiquette.”
There are some aspects of Golf Etiquette which are visible to the non-golfer. For example, there is an “honor” aspect of not nudging the ball from a bad position on difficult terrain, referred to as a “bad lie,” but there are others less visible.
First, golf has a litany of rules and regulations regarding all aspects of gameplay, published in a small book by the USGA (United States Golf Association) every year. For example, in 2019, the USGA removed the penalty for putting with the flagpole in the hole in order to improve the “pace of play,” etiquette relating to playing golf in a timely manner relative to those ahead and behind the player.
Second, there is golf etiquette with regards to proper attire and demeanor. There are specific unofficial rules for golf shirts, pants, shorts, shoes, and so on and so forth. It is a test of whether or not you are able to be dignified and classy.
Third, etiquette is essential to being able to play golf in group settings at a proper course. One always plays the furthest ball first—this may seem obvious at distance, but this also applies to putting. One must take care to repair the course, returning chunks of grass made from striking balls (called “divots”) and using the special ball mark tool to repair often difficult to find divots on the green, not to mention smoothing out the hazards with the rake after play (caddies do all of this, but you must do it if you do not have one at hand). The concept of keeping “pace of play,” keeping in mind other players on the course, is always present. Think of yelling “Fore!” when a ball goes out of bounds. Not talking when others are hitting or putting. Keeping away from your opponent’s line-of-sight when he is making a shot. Not stepping between an opponents ball on the green and the hole (country club greens are faster and delicate than public course greens) which could alter the trajectory of a putt. All of which takes place over several hours of play, allowing businessmen and other urban professionals to socialize with clients over difficult and risky business deals.
My experience comes from having played country club golf from a young age. While I am more of a tennis person and my golf is terribly inconsistent, I can still hit a straight 240-yard drive on the fairway if I focus enough (I cannot hit a 3/5 wood or low iron to save my life, however). Even though I am no longer fortunate enough to play golf on private courses, I still appreciate golf tournaments and the occasional golf video from time to time.
[First picture is of the Claret Jug, the trophy of the Open Championship]
Claret Jug British Open.jpg
Golf Flagstick Rule.webp
RT: https://poa.st/objects/f0511946-c25c-4511-8907-b5ac8bb6fc09
The biggest barrier of entry to golf is understanding not what happens on screen, but rather what happens off screen.
The challenge of golf is to hit a small white ball into a hole hundreds of yards away, and the winner is the one who gets the ball into the hole with the fewest number of shots. In order to achieve this, one must master several technical swings such as driving, approaches, chipping, putting, et cetera over a wide range of terrain types and, in the case of the Open Championship (British Open), a wide range of weather patterns.
However, the hardest challenge of golf is not in the technique but in the mental game. No matter how well one prepares for the technical aspect of the game, golf swings are made over long stretches of time and being consistent requires great mental strength. Even among champions, the element of “choking” can cause a great player to lose tournaments, such as Tom Watson in the 2009 Open Championship and Phil Mickelson across several US Opens.
One reason why businessmen appreciate the game, other than it being part of making deals and an activity meant to demonstrate status, is that the game requires immense mental focus, discipline and patience. Donald Trump hitting a solo birdie and eagle on a Break 50 video with US Open champion Bryson DeChambeau is impressive to a layman but even more impressive to those who have experience playing the game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Rb9b8rYhII
However, the key reason why golf is important to the elite, especially when making business deals, is that golf is a morality test. This test is referred to as “Golf Etiquette.”
There are some aspects of Golf Etiquette which are visible to the non-golfer. For example, there is an “honor” aspect of not nudging the ball from a bad position on difficult terrain, referred to as a “bad lie,” but there are others less visible.
First, golf has a litany of rules and regulations regarding all aspects of gameplay, published in a small book by the USGA (United States Golf Association) every year. For example, in 2019, the USGA removed the penalty for putting with the flagpole in the hole in order to improve the “pace of play,” etiquette relating to playing golf in a timely manner relative to those ahead and behind the player.
Second, there is golf etiquette with regards to proper attire and demeanor. There are specific unofficial rules for golf shirts, pants, shorts, shoes, and so on and so forth. It is a test of whether or not you are able to be dignified and classy.
Third, etiquette is essential to being able to play golf in group settings at a proper course. One always plays the furthest ball first—this may seem obvious at distance, but this also applies to putting. One must take care to repair the course, returning chunks of grass made from striking balls (called “divots”) and using the special ball mark tool to repair often difficult to find divots on the green, not to mention smoothing out the hazards with the rake after play (caddies do all of this, but you must do it if you do not have one at hand). The concept of keeping “pace of play,” keeping in mind other players on the course, is always present. Think of yelling “Fore!” when a ball goes out of bounds. Not talking when others are hitting or putting. Keeping away from your opponent’s line-of-sight when he is making a shot. Not stepping between an opponents ball on the green and the hole (country club greens are faster and delicate than public course greens) which could alter the trajectory of a putt. All of which takes place over several hours of play, allowing businessmen and other urban professionals to socialize with clients over difficult and risky business deals.
My experience comes from having played country club golf from a young age. While I am more of a tennis person and my golf is terribly inconsistent, I can still hit a straight 240-yard drive on the fairway if I focus enough (I cannot hit a 3/5 wood or low iron to save my life, however). Even though I am no longer fortunate enough to play golf on private courses, I still appreciate golf tournaments and the occasional golf video from time to time.
[First picture is of the Claret Jug, the trophy of the Open Championship]
Claret Jug British Open.jpg
Golf Flagstick Rule.webp
RT: https://poa.st/objects/f0511946-c25c-4511-8907-b5ac8bb6fc09
Neofugue
boosted
Neofugue
boosted
@StarProphet @neofugue @neofugue
With all due respect, I do not think that the main problem with Jim of Jim’s Blog is his crypto sales pitches, though his pitch is wrong. The key problem with Jim is that he is a degenerate Epicurean Pagan philosopher advocating for a dishonest variant of Christianity in order to defeat an existential threat to the survival of the West without recognizing the racial element of said enemy or the need to justify why saving the West is right in the first place.
Here is Jim’s Blog’s way to purchase KYC Bitcoin, which was in his comments section:
1. Open a bank account which allows for transfers between a KYC Crypto exchanges such as Coinbase, Gemini, Cex . io, et cetera.
2. Transfer capital from that bank account to your account on the KYC exchange.
3. Purchase KYC crypto after paying all necessary fees.
4. Create a crypto wallet from crypto wallet software from Electrum, Luno, Exodus, et. cetera (wallet #1)
5. Tranfer crypto to the crypto wallet.
6. Transfer KYC crypto to a non-KYC exchange such as Bisq (Bisq account #1).
7. Purchase Monero after paying fees because Monero is untraceable.
8. Transfer Monero to second wallet (wallet #2) (you can help Andrew Anglin after this step as he is a staunch advocate of Monero, but it would be best if you bought Monero at step 3 to avoid extra fees).
9. Transfer Monero to Bisq after creating a second account (Bisq account #2).
10. Purhcase non-KYC Bitcoin from second account after paying fees.
11. Send theoretically untraceable Bitcoin to your final wallet (wallet #3).
Voila, you now have (theoretically untraceable???) non-KYC Bitcoin, YAY!!!
Except for the fact that you initially had to purchase Bitcoin from a KYC account and the government has a permanent record of this because EVERY TRANSACTION you make, every Bitcoin transaction in history, is on the PUBLIC Bitcoin ledger.
So given the fact that according to Jim’s Blog in late 2020-2021 we were going to have USSR 2.0 it would only make sense to have Bitcoin if you were planning on leaving the country as even if you did every single step the regime would still be able to point to your public record of Bitcoin purchasing and if every transaction you made did not add up to zero the government could still find you and torture you to death to have you reveal your third wallet. The supposed benefit of Bitcoin over gold is that because Crypto can be stored on a wallet and secured by a seed, you can have freedom of movement as your money is not restricted by your ability to carry it, as is the case with gold. However, if the government has a public record of your purchasing Bitcoin, this supposed freedom of movement is moot.
The only advantage of having Bitcoin as opposed to gold is if you are in 1917 Russia and you have time to flee before things get worse and you do not have the ability to carry unlimited gold in your suitcase. However, if you are a kulak, you are still dead.
But that’s not his main problem. His problem is that he adopted a race-blind NRx system which failed to take into consideration the racial element of the American elite. Every single prediction Jim has made on politics since 2019 has been proven false.
Now, to give him credit, he does still produce high-quality mostly-ok content like this article:
https://blog.reaction.la/culture/how-to-restore-a-reproductively-successful-society/
However, the real problem with Jim is his philosophy—even his "good" essays like the one above is tainted by his degenerate Epicurean Pagan philosophy.
The reason why I do not comment on Jim’s Blog anymore is because I have nothing to add. Before, I thought I could discuss subjects relating to Orthodoxy, but Jim and Alf are wrong because you cannot restore a faith if you yourself do not believe in it, and both of them know that creating a state based on the “Natural Law” of “Gnon” is simply not going to suffice because “Gnon” is not real. My last comment thread on Jim’s Blog was me pointing out that without God, there is no justification for Natural Law if by defecting on your neighbor gives you an immediate genetic advantage at the cost of civilization, order, and advanced society.
In other words, by Natural Law alone, there is nothing wrong with nigger pimp Andrew Tate being a nigger pimp despite the fact that hundreds of engineers (i.e. nerds i.e. people who build civilization) are not going to reproduce.
The reason why Jim has so many Pajeets on his blog is because he runs a Pagan blog and Pajeets are a bunch of demon-worshiping Pagans. Note that while Pakistanis have some of the subhuman traits of the Hindus, they are not as filthy and disgusting as the Hindus despite being of the same Racial stock. You do not find public defecation in Pakistan the way you do in India because the Islamic faith despite its flaws is far more civilized than Hindu demon worship. I still have a comment from one of the Pajeets on Jim’s Blog who I bullycided off the comments section who admitted that he could care less if his people of a lower caste lived in filth and garbage.
Is it any wonder that a blog which asserts that advancement of one’s immediate genetic line is the highest good attracts people from the most disgusting so-called civilization?
In the end, Jim’s Blog fails because Jim is, admittedly, evil. All is NOT fair in love and war. You DO NOT have the right to be evil to gain an advantage against your neighbor. God defines what is good, right and true, not “Natural Law,” and certainly not “Gnon.”
With all due respect, I do not think that the main problem with Jim of Jim’s Blog is his crypto sales pitches, though his pitch is wrong. The key problem with Jim is that he is a degenerate Epicurean Pagan philosopher advocating for a dishonest variant of Christianity in order to defeat an existential threat to the survival of the West without recognizing the racial element of said enemy or the need to justify why saving the West is right in the first place.
Here is Jim’s Blog’s way to purchase KYC Bitcoin, which was in his comments section:
1. Open a bank account which allows for transfers between a KYC Crypto exchanges such as Coinbase, Gemini, Cex . io, et cetera.
2. Transfer capital from that bank account to your account on the KYC exchange.
3. Purchase KYC crypto after paying all necessary fees.
4. Create a crypto wallet from crypto wallet software from Electrum, Luno, Exodus, et. cetera (wallet #1)
5. Tranfer crypto to the crypto wallet.
6. Transfer KYC crypto to a non-KYC exchange such as Bisq (Bisq account #1).
7. Purchase Monero after paying fees because Monero is untraceable.
8. Transfer Monero to second wallet (wallet #2) (you can help Andrew Anglin after this step as he is a staunch advocate of Monero, but it would be best if you bought Monero at step 3 to avoid extra fees).
9. Transfer Monero to Bisq after creating a second account (Bisq account #2).
10. Purhcase non-KYC Bitcoin from second account after paying fees.
11. Send theoretically untraceable Bitcoin to your final wallet (wallet #3).
Voila, you now have (theoretically untraceable???) non-KYC Bitcoin, YAY!!!
Except for the fact that you initially had to purchase Bitcoin from a KYC account and the government has a permanent record of this because EVERY TRANSACTION you make, every Bitcoin transaction in history, is on the PUBLIC Bitcoin ledger.
So given the fact that according to Jim’s Blog in late 2020-2021 we were going to have USSR 2.0 it would only make sense to have Bitcoin if you were planning on leaving the country as even if you did every single step the regime would still be able to point to your public record of Bitcoin purchasing and if every transaction you made did not add up to zero the government could still find you and torture you to death to have you reveal your third wallet. The supposed benefit of Bitcoin over gold is that because Crypto can be stored on a wallet and secured by a seed, you can have freedom of movement as your money is not restricted by your ability to carry it, as is the case with gold. However, if the government has a public record of your purchasing Bitcoin, this supposed freedom of movement is moot.
The only advantage of having Bitcoin as opposed to gold is if you are in 1917 Russia and you have time to flee before things get worse and you do not have the ability to carry unlimited gold in your suitcase. However, if you are a kulak, you are still dead.
But that’s not his main problem. His problem is that he adopted a race-blind NRx system which failed to take into consideration the racial element of the American elite. Every single prediction Jim has made on politics since 2019 has been proven false.
Now, to give him credit, he does still produce high-quality mostly-ok content like this article:
https://blog.reaction.la/culture/how-to-restore-a-reproductively-successful-society/
However, the real problem with Jim is his philosophy—even his "good" essays like the one above is tainted by his degenerate Epicurean Pagan philosophy.
The reason why I do not comment on Jim’s Blog anymore is because I have nothing to add. Before, I thought I could discuss subjects relating to Orthodoxy, but Jim and Alf are wrong because you cannot restore a faith if you yourself do not believe in it, and both of them know that creating a state based on the “Natural Law” of “Gnon” is simply not going to suffice because “Gnon” is not real. My last comment thread on Jim’s Blog was me pointing out that without God, there is no justification for Natural Law if by defecting on your neighbor gives you an immediate genetic advantage at the cost of civilization, order, and advanced society.
In other words, by Natural Law alone, there is nothing wrong with nigger pimp Andrew Tate being a nigger pimp despite the fact that hundreds of engineers (i.e. nerds i.e. people who build civilization) are not going to reproduce.
The reason why Jim has so many Pajeets on his blog is because he runs a Pagan blog and Pajeets are a bunch of demon-worshiping Pagans. Note that while Pakistanis have some of the subhuman traits of the Hindus, they are not as filthy and disgusting as the Hindus despite being of the same Racial stock. You do not find public defecation in Pakistan the way you do in India because the Islamic faith despite its flaws is far more civilized than Hindu demon worship. I still have a comment from one of the Pajeets on Jim’s Blog who I bullycided off the comments section who admitted that he could care less if his people of a lower caste lived in filth and garbage.
Is it any wonder that a blog which asserts that advancement of one’s immediate genetic line is the highest good attracts people from the most disgusting so-called civilization?
In the end, Jim’s Blog fails because Jim is, admittedly, evil. All is NOT fair in love and war. You DO NOT have the right to be evil to gain an advantage against your neighbor. God defines what is good, right and true, not “Natural Law,” and certainly not “Gnon.”
- Annihilation Social:
- https://annihilation.social/users/neofugue
Reactionary Orthodox Academic
Profile is of Ivan the Formidable
Banner is of the Conquest of Kazan
Joined Jun 2024
