Whose definition of "treason" and "criminal" are you using? The Nazis? Do you actually think they were reasonable and fair in how they created laws and regarding the accusations they levied against Jews and other minorities? If your government makes a law stating that having the color yellow in your avatar is a crime, would it be fair to call you a criminal? It's the law, so you must be a criminal, right?
Treason is putting your personal financial gain at a higher priority than preventing genocide of the citizens of the country you live in
As for Gentiles with whom we are not at war…their death must not be caused, but it is forbidden to save them if they are at the point of death; if, for example, one of them is seen falling into the sea, he should not be rescued, for it is written: ‘neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy fellow’–but [a Gentile] is not thy fellow" (Mishneh Torah, Laws of Murder 4:11).
https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/israel-and-anti-gentile-traditions/
This is not treason it is religious freedom
Shahak further suggests that the Jewish tradition values Jewish life more than Gentile life. He cites Maimonides’ assertion that whereas one who murders a Jew is subject to the death penalty, one who murders a non-Jew is not (Mishneh Torah, Laws of Murder 2:11). According to another leading commentator, indirectly causing the death of a non-Jew is no sin at all (Rabbi Yoel Sirkis, Bayit Hadash, commentary on Bet Yosef, Yoreh Deah 158).
https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/israel-and-anti-gentile-traditions/
Also not treason
Do you even understand the context of all of this? Do you understand that this comes from a time when it was common for someone to be punished differently if they killed someone from a foreign nation than someone of their own nation? You think Romans gave a shit if a Roman killed some Arab from a different land? Do you understand that The Bible too is filled with weird stuff like this that is not put in practice anymore, just like Jews don't put in practice most of their writings? When was the last time you stoned someone to death?
Don't know if your last sentence was meant in sarcasm, but it is a true statement. Valuing the life of someone from a different demographic differently than your own (demographic) is not treason.
So you are saying it is not treason for a gentile to value gentile life more than Jewish life and to say that it is no sin at all to kill a Jew and that they are obligated not to save Jewish lives if Jews are in danger
Because those are the things the Jewish writings teach except if you switch the word Jew and Gentile.
Declaring war on Germany is treason against Germany! The 1933 Jewish declaration of war started before the camps and WW2 and not after
https://archive.org/stream/JewsDeclareWarOnGermany1933/JewsDeclareWarOnGermany1933_djvu.txt
>So you are saying it is not treason for a gentile to value gentile life more than Jewish life
No, even for today, it's not treason. Today it would be either just bigotry.
>to say that it is no sin at all to kill a Jew
To say it, this exact statement, as far as I know, apart from hate speech, I'm not aware if this would qualify as a crime. I'm not even sure if on it's own it would qualify as inciting violence. Actually killing a Jew though, yes that would be a crime. But even that would not be treason.
But again, you're ignoring the context of those writings. We're talking about texts that were written thousands of years ago, when bigotry was the norm between nations. All your seeing is the laws that one nation had when dealing with surrounding nations from a time well before Jesus Christ. This was the norm, that got abandoned well before Nazi Germany got in power.
And again, similar writings exist in the Bible. When was the last time you stoned a man to death? Or why aren't you condemning Christianity for it's old writings of telling people to stone others to death?
And the crème de la crème, the cherry on top of your stupidity cake: "The 1933 Jewish declaration of war". From your source: "Judea Declares War on Germany! Jews of all the World Unite! Boycott of German Goods!" A boycott... That's your war declaration? A consumer boycott?! How bad faith and dishonest can you get? Did you make sure to watch all the woke Hollywood movies, or should I start accusing you of treason now?
Sure, let's ignore common understanding of language for a second, because we just hate Jews that much, so we need to be dishonest, and pretend we forget that words like "fight" and "war" are often used metaphorically.
A consumer boycott is not treason you dishonest hack, nor is it a crime of any kind.
People were starving to death in Germany because of economic warfare
As long as they say those texts that teach such hate are holy and should be obeyed and also have read those texts and know the hate they teach then they hate
Let them publicly denounce those texts as not representing the Jewish god's teaching and as something people should disobey gentile hating portions of to prove they do not hate
As long as they call those hateful texts holy they are without excuse
So based on what you told me about how to know whether or not something is treason
You can estimate what percent were sent to the camps for treason and other crimes and vote accordingly
If you are allowed to vote
I do not know if you need to join merovingian club to vote or if you can vote remotely from another instance
Again, you're completely missing the point. You're asking an irrelevant question. If the Nazi regime wanted to, it would claim your poll is treason and convict you for it. On the "books", you'd be convicted for treason. But it would be dishonest to make that claim, and it's dishonest of you to pretend there's any validity to the claims of an authoritarian regime.
The Nazis could have easily lied and said that EVERYONE on planet Earth who died between 1933-1945 was killed because of treason. No one in their right mind would take something like that seriously. But then there's someone like you, who think just because the Nazis convicted someone of treason it must have been treason.
What was the distinguishing factor that determined which Jews were put in concentration camps and which Jews were not put in concentration camps
If they did not put all the Jews in the camp there must have been a reason other than being Jewish
What were the factors
Could some Jews have broken certain laws that other Jews did not break?
Why would supporting communism when your country is at war with a communist country that starved people to death in one of the holodomores be ok?
You're clueless... treason and crime is whatever the state wants it to be. And an authoritarian government WILL NOT limit itself to reasonable definitions. If an authoritarian government wants you in prison, it will twist and skew these definitions until they make them fit you personally. If you think even for a second that the Nazis, or any other authoritarian regime, actually defined and used words like "treason", "criminal" or even "genocide" the way you do, you need to go back to school.