By the way, not to be creepy, but can you tell a difference when I don't take my benzodiazepines medication in how I express myself from the usual benzo sedated conversations I have. I just feel completely different without that medication.
@dicey I don't spend enough time on fedi to get a proper read on the people here really, so I don't think so.
Well I can tell you it's day and night internally in my head. I awake. And think much quicker. My senses return.
@dicey That's good, benzos are a savage and evil drug
You really make being on here worthwhile. Just by your presence. You add a certain sensibility to the experience of being here everyday. I'm sure @Leaflord agrees
@dicey @Leaflord Thank you Dicey. I am glad that my anti-semitism with plausible deniability can bring some SENSE to this two bit social network
>anti-semitism with plausible deniability
The irony
Einstein was a jew. I haven't heard anyone hating him, it would be strange. It's really not about who you are but what people do.
@dicey @hidden @Leaflord @Hyolobrika you havent heard he was a fraud, or about his not so great personal relations?
I heard it from one person just now. The great individual going under the name of gav

@dicey @gav @hidden @Leaflord @Hyolobrika

"Albert Einstein presented the theories of special relativity and general relativity in publications that either contained no formal references to previous literature, or referred only to a small number of his predecessors"

"Subsequently, claims have been put forward about both theories, asserting that they were formulated, either wholly or in part, by others before Einstein"

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relati

@dicey @gav @hidden @Leaflord @Hyolobrika

In his History of the theories of ether and electricity from 1953, E. T. Whittaker claimed that relativity is the creation of Poincaré and Lorentz and attributed to Einstein's papers only little importance

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relati

@shortstories @dicey @gav @hidden @Leaflord @Hyolobrika Yes and No. Lorentz did indeed derived the Lorentz transformation, but in the context of the Aether Luminipherous theory, so it maintained that it existed a privileged reference frame for light, Einstein throw away all that stating that the laws of nature must be the same for all reference frames. That's why Einstein had to state that light had a constant value ( i.e. light particles are massless ) which was the same for all reference frames.

@TheMadPirate @gav @hidden @Leaflord @dicey @Hyolobrika

In physics, an object, like your pants, can shrink when you put them in the dryer. But the dryer can NEVER shrink the “length” of your pants. Length is a static qualitative property that can neither shrink nor expand.....no way in Hell.

discover.hubpages.com/educatio

Relativity Length Contraction is a Fraud by Fatfist

discover.hubpages dot com

@shortstories @gav @hidden @Leaflord @dicey @Hyolobrika you will need to observing an going at least .5c to observe a noticeable length contraction.
And you will need a video camera of at least 1/(.5c) fps to observe it.

@TheMadPirate @gav @hidden @Leaflord @dicey @Hyolobrika

1 / 0.5c = time / length

time / length frames per second makes no sense

This might be some number of seconds per meter per second

or in other words a camera rate of per meter

like some number of meters to the negative one power

Your units are wrong

Rethink and or rewrite what you are trying to say

@shortstories @gav @hidden @Leaflord @dicey @Hyolobrika
Let me see, omega * dL = .5c , therefore omega = .5c/dL , so yeah, you are right. But dL = Gamma*L , therefor omega = (.5c/Gamma(0.5c)) * 1/L0 , if me make L0 = 1 m in the reference system with c expressed in meters/second , the fps i.e. frequency would have to be omega = 1/sqrt(3) * c *L0 ( with L0 = 1 m ).
Follow

@TheMadPirate @gav @hidden @Leaflord @dicey @Hyolobrika

it should be a unitless number of frames per second

the units should be per second

or seconds to the negative one power

a unitless number is put in front of the phrase per second

or a unitless number is put in front of seconds to the negative one power

cameras operate at frames per second and not feet per second

· · Web · 2 · 0 · 0

@TheMadPirate @gav @hidden @Leaflord @dicey @Hyolobrika

By FPS do you mean frames per second or feet per second?

Just because special relativity is claimed to make some predictions correctly that other models also do then that does not mean it is correct if it is shown to be self contradictory

It can be disproven without any physical experiment If it is self contradictory

I am not obligated to show another theory that predicts correct results in order to say special relativity is wrong

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.