The irony
@dicey @gav @hidden @Leaflord @Hyolobrika
"Albert Einstein presented the theories of special relativity and general relativity in publications that either contained no formal references to previous literature, or referred only to a small number of his predecessors"
"Subsequently, claims have been put forward about both theories, asserting that they were formulated, either wholly or in part, by others before Einstein"
@dicey @gav @hidden @Leaflord @Hyolobrika
In his History of the theories of ether and electricity from 1953, E. T. Whittaker claimed that relativity is the creation of Poincaré and Lorentz and attributed to Einstein's papers only little importance
@TheMadPirate @gav @hidden @Leaflord @dicey @Hyolobrika
In physics, an object, like your pants, can shrink when you put them in the dryer. But the dryer can NEVER shrink the “length” of your pants. Length is a static qualitative property that can neither shrink nor expand.....no way in Hell.
https://discover.hubpages.com/education/Relativity-Length-Contraction-is-a-FRAUD
Relativity Length Contraction is a Fraud by Fatfist
discover.hubpages dot com
And you will need a video camera of at least 1/(.5c) fps to observe it.
@TheMadPirate @gav @hidden @Leaflord @dicey @Hyolobrika
1 / 0.5c = time / length
time / length frames per second makes no sense
This might be some number of seconds per meter per second
or in other words a camera rate of per meter
like some number of meters to the negative one power
Your units are wrong
Rethink and or rewrite what you are trying to say
@TheMadPirate @gav @hidden @Leaflord @dicey @Hyolobrika
Superstition in Science 3: Relativity Demystified
SteamPunkPhysics
Youtube
@TheMadPirate @gav @hidden @Leaflord @dicey @Hyolobrika
Supposedly clocks moving at fast speeds relative to one another that started at the same time before they started moving relative to one another will give different results although I have never tested that
But that does not prove Einstein's theory because other theories also give that result
Self contrafictions disprove Einstein's theory
Those who point out Einstein's contradictions are called not smart or antisemitic
@TheMadPirate @gav @hidden @Humpleupagus @Leaflord @dicey @Hyolobrika
A car is moving a 0.99 times the speed of light relative to the ground on the race track & the finish line
A wall is a certain distance past the finish line
When the center of the car touches the finish line for both reference frames
From one reference frame the car hits the wall
From the other reference frame the car does not hit the wall
For a certain car length and wall distance from the finish line
So contradictory
@gav @hidden @TheMadPirate @Humpleupagus @Leaflord @dicey @Hyolobrika
According to the theory the car will not hit the wall in one reference frame but will hit it in the other reference frame when the center of the car crosses the finish line because from one reference frame the car shrinks and the ground stays the same size and from the other reference frame the ground shrinks and the car stays the same sjze
That is why you can know the theory is wrong without experiments
And I will log out
A 'light clock' is a photon bouncing back and forth between two mirrors at a fixed distance. Each bounce counts as one 'tick' of the clock.
If I take two identical copies of this clock and have one fixed and one moving (in a direction parallel to the mirrors at a speed less than c), then I will observe that the 'ticks' of the moving clock happen slower than the 'ticks' of the fixed clock. This is because the photon of the moving clock has to travel a longer distance (see pic) and the speed of light is (assumed to be) constant.
If relativity holds, then I will observe the opposite result of the experiment (the ticks of one clock happening faster than the other) if I move along with the moving clock.
The idea of "experiencing time slower" is a bit meaningless and I think it's meant to conjure an image of a particle carrying a tiny little light clock inside of it. But the overall message of the thought experiment is not meaningless: if you believe that light should have the same speed in any reference frame, then certain questions of "before" or "after" also depend on the reference frame in which you ask.
...Maybe some particles do carry little clocks inside, like when you have radioactive decay?
Also the graphs you posted are fucking retarded, jumping in a car doesn't make you travel longer distance nor affects how long the ride takes, you're just jumping in a car. This is one thing retardationlists miss - when everything is oh so relative, the particle and the object carrying it is one and same physical object.
radioactive decay should be a structural problem inside nuclei, theyre in a period of spiraling out like a top, theyre mostly isolated so its mostly constant, assumably their electron clouds should have some effect because they effect the nucleuss density, and should pull protons. more than neutrons
also, inertia might afect nuclear decay by slightly compressing the front of the nucleus
@gav @hidden @TheMadPirate @Humpleupagus @Leaflord @dicey @Hyolobrika
If two clocks are set to the same time at the start of an experiment
Then a experimental treatment occurs
The special and or general theory of relativity predicts what times the clock will display after the experiment & so do other theories
These experiments are beyond the $$$ access of common people
Fake Data?
Displaying a different value on a clock does not mean time slowed down or sped up or took longer or shorter
it just doesnt because time isnt a thing it doesnt alter, so if a clock displayed wrong something was done to its mechanism. if you have to choose between c or t beong variable, you have to choose c
