@TrevorGoodchild @pepsi_man

Radiometric dating only works if you know the starting conditions

I find Carbon dating less problematic in it's assumptions because you can assume a certain amount of carbon isotopes in the atmosphere being the same in the past as today but I did not say that it is not problematic

Other dating methods are more problematic in my opinion

Let's say you have Uranium turn to lead and try to find the date by the ratio of Uranium to Lead

What was it before 100% Uranium

@shortstories @TrevorGoodchild
Not to mention the asymptote in the carbon dating graph. At about 40k years?

Anyone speaking with authority about "muh million years ago" is talking out of their ass.
@pepsi_man @shortstories @TrevorGoodchild In 6th grade, they told me such methods were foolproof. Most normies still believe this.
@JollyWizard @shortstories @TrevorGoodchild
That's bc soyence is the new religion and public school is the temple

You wouldn't go to church and doubt the existence of God, now would you?
Follow

@pepsi_man @JollyWizard @TrevorGoodchild

Some spokesperson for Answers in Genesis said that Christians who majored in or perhaps were professors in hard sciences like physics or chemistry were more likely to believe in Young Earth Creation than Pastors who attended seminary for their degree instead or perhaps seminary professors

I wish I could find a link on their website describing this supposed study

· · Web · 1 · 0 · 1
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.