CatSoc 
:ameowree: 
>Women with low blood levels of vitamin D during pregnancy, for example, were more than twice as likely to have a child with autism as those who were not vitamin D-deficient, according to one analysis in the Netherlands.
>Children with ASD consistently reported significantly lower vitamin D levels than typically developing children. Moreover, vitamin D deficiency was found to be strongly correlated with ASD severity.
>Children who are, or who are destined to become, autistic have lower 25(OH)D levels at 3 months of gestation, at birth and at age 8 compared to their unaffected siblings. Two open label trials found high dose vitamin D improves the core symptoms of autism in about 75% of autistic children. A few of the improvements were remarkable.
>There is increasing evidence that vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy and early childhood can lead to the occurrence of ASD. Studies have demonstrated that vitamin D intervention can significantly improve the symptoms of ASD, but the underlying mechanism is still unclear.
>Children with ASD consistently reported significantly lower vitamin D levels than typically developing children. Moreover, vitamin D deficiency was found to be strongly correlated with ASD severity.
>Children who are, or who are destined to become, autistic have lower 25(OH)D levels at 3 months of gestation, at birth and at age 8 compared to their unaffected siblings. Two open label trials found high dose vitamin D improves the core symptoms of autism in about 75% of autistic children. A few of the improvements were remarkable.
>There is increasing evidence that vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy and early childhood can lead to the occurrence of ASD. Studies have demonstrated that vitamin D intervention can significantly improve the symptoms of ASD, but the underlying mechanism is still unclear.
@CatLord So, what you're saying is, don't go outside when pregnant, because we want more autists.
...
This also explains the nips.
...
This also explains the nips.
@Zergling_man No it's not good👺
@CatLord If you're not autismmaxing you're doing it wrong.
Follow
So we want to maximize the number of high functioning autistic people while minimizing the number of low functioning autistic people
@shortstories @CatLord Right yeah, important distinction.
@shortstories @Zergling_man savants, specialists, and geniuses will always be around, as long as we're doing okay as a nation tbh
Would that mean that we can measure the success of a nation by the percentage of high functioning autists
@shortstories @Zergling_man i wouldn't really equate the categories i listed with high functioning autists. it's honestly a very difficult question: how much of autism is natural variance and how much of it is sickness.
people kid around with this stuff but i actually find it very interesting. it's important.
to answer your question: i don't know but genius is certainly something we value.
people kid around with this stuff but i actually find it very interesting. it's important.
to answer your question: i don't know but genius is certainly something we value.
Genius conformists only make society a worse place when the standard to conform to makes things worse
You can not have a average world IQ other than 100
what if you delete niggers? That should raise the average somewhat.
@lord_nougat @gav @CatLord @Zergling_man
You can raise the average but the average will still be 100 IQ because 100 IQ is set as average
@shortstories @CatLord @Zergling_man its a relative measure of something absolute, its actually in the 90s or 80s right now because white american from like 10 years ago defines 100
there was some study or someone calculated the quantity of people over 120 per country and compared this to measures of success and it was predictive
similar to how 90 is the cutoff of hypotheticals and a certain amount of recursion, 120 is the cutoff for certain kinds of statistics, or at least it was shoen that way once, so theres likely a similar hard barrier
there was some study or someone calculated the quantity of people over 120 per country and compared this to measures of success and it was predictive
similar to how 90 is the cutoff of hypotheticals and a certain amount of recursion, 120 is the cutoff for certain kinds of statistics, or at least it was shoen that way once, so theres likely a similar hard barrier
