So unfortunately I knew homosexual people not by choice before this transgender thing got big
Now people warned it would be a slippery slope. I would argue it would not be a slippery slope if the homosexual people only wanted homosexuality to be legalized but had no intention to promote transgenderism.
But the thing is homosexuals were promoting transgenderism for decades
The reason it was a slippery slope is many homosexuals planned to chop off people's body parts from the very beginning
You see homosexuals knew this chopping off people's body parts things would be less popular than homosexuality so they started with legalized homosexuality instead of starting with their full end goal, and this chopping off people's body parts is not even their end goal, their end goal is even worse
I thought homosexuals' end goal was just to have sex with the same gender
what other goal would they have?
this contradicts @shortstories, who is laying out a rather complex set of goals for them
@relentless_eduardo @Humpleupagus
A large number of them have a complex set of goals that relate to a simple philosophy of hedonism and the belief that if it gives them gratification in the short run then they have a Right to do it
There are exceptions of some homosexuals that do not have the complex set of goals
But most people are turned into homosexuals through propaganda and would not naturally be homosexuals if they were willing to avoid doing what feels good in order for long term gains
@relentless_eduardo @Humpleupagus
You see there are plenty of men who are attracted to men but do not believe they have a right to have physical relations with men and do not choose to do so because they know it is harmful to society by raising the rates of STDs at the cost of no benefit since they can not reproduce that way
If they are going to do that they could minimize harm by having less partners but they have massive amounts of partners typically
@relentless_eduardo @Humpleupagus
Once they cross over to the philosophy that it is ok for men to have physical relations with men because it provides short term gratification that comes with a bunch of other things encouraged that harm society but provide short term gratification
The men who are attracted to men but choose not to act on it because it harms society have a philosophy of helping society in the long run even if it is not as gratifying in the short run
"bunch of other things encouraged that harm society but provide short term gratification"
what are these things and how do they harm society?
@relentless_eduardo @Humpleupagus
1 They lifted the entry ban of HIV AIDS that George Bush tried but failed to Remove under Barack Hussein Obama
2 If you accept that men have a right to have physical relations with men because it feels good it opens up desire for the whole LGBTQP+ ideology because it feels good. 1 / 2 of statutory r*** cases are involving two people of the same gender but less than 1 / 2 of people are homosexual or bisexual
3 Low or No impulse control in decision making
@relentless_eduardo @Humpleupagus
4 Encourages the philosophy that I have a right to tax people because it feels good for me to have free stuff at other people's expense even though it is bad for society in the long run
5 The philosophy that doing what feels good in the moment is important even if bad in the wrong run leads to preventable diseases like diabetes
6 It leads to relationships between men who do not consent with other men in prisons because they think have a right to it
@relentless_eduardo @Humpleupagus
7 Many people who choose to practice a homosexual lifestyle often claim they are making the world a better place by reducing the population and often adopt the goals of the Church of Euthanasia and Planned Parenthood
your entire point 7 can be deleted because it is just a description of a subject opinion, not an objective face
you reduce all homo relationships to impulsive expedience but there could be the same reasons as straights have, including love
SMFH.
@Humpleupagus @shortstories @MisterRogersSnapped
:not all pedophiles are like that, therefore it's ok. "
except that that implied conclusion here is that we can lump person A with person B just because person A does something we don't like
Only a fag would make your argument.
You're gay. And it shows.
😒
I don't know where this quote came from, if it is a quote. it's off topic for this thread.
and eating pizza provides more pleasure utils than fucking it
@relentless_eduardo @Humpleupagus
relentless_eduardo said, "you reduce all homo relationships to impulsive expedience but there could be the same reasons as straights have, including love"
1 I am talking about most homosexual males
2 You can love someone without having physical relations with them. In fact I would suggest that your love is better if you do not choose to increase their risk of getting an STD for your own gratification
@relentless_eduardo @Humpleupagus
Also I do not endorse encouraging men who had physical relations with men into converting to have physical relations with women because then they will just have increased likelihood of spreading STDs into the heterosexual community
And having physical relations with women does not mean someone is not homosexual because there are bisexuals
Bisexuals who have already had physical relations with men would help society better becoming celibate usually
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]
#hot #take: #homosexuality is disgusting because shit is disgusting, and male bodily fluid are disgusting to a healthy heterosexual male. It's why a man feels dirty and wants to wash up after masturbating.
Could care less about the higher-order effects of what is beneficial to society. You think #trophy #wives marrying a #rich #fuck care what is beneficial to society?
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]
#hotter #hot #take: a healthy bromance is good and something I wish I could have had the opportunity to have in life.
Unfortunately, the men who have been most receptive to tight bear hugs are, in fact, homosexual. They want the poopdick. 🤮
@KuteboiCoder @Humpleupagus @relentless_eduardo
Look if the person became rich through honest and ethical means then whether or not they think they are doing what is good for society by reproducing with ethical businessmen Trophy wives are making the world a better place, but they make it a worse place if they divorce them for their money
However the trophy wives who marry the rich men with unethical business practices and reproduce with them make the world a worse place
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]
Foids don't understand the business practices and life skills that make rich men rich. If they did then they would be rich.
@KuteboiCoder @Humpleupagus @relentless_eduardo
I did not know what that word meant here is what the Kike Anti Defamation League defines it as
And I am going to log out of here and do other stuff now if I do not reply to comments right away
https://extremismterms.adl.org/glossary/foid
Foid is a derogatory incel term for woman. The phrase is an abbreviation of "femoid" which combines the words "female" and "humanoid" or "female" and "android."
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]
shower thoughts: the right of property and the right of inheritance is good and beneficial to society during periods of imperial expansion, nation-building and economic growth. The right of inheritance is destructive to society during historical periods of decline and collapse.
But during the decline and collapse, the elites needs their inherited wealth even more than they do during times of prosperity. The nature of inheritance is putting family first.
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]
Elect based poopdickers, goy
@relentless_eduardo @Humpleupagus
Because a large amount of the propaganda that turns people into homosexuals in the current year is from Kikes. A large number of homosexuals share the kike goals like the goals of the United Nations, The European Union, the world Economic Forum and the Democratic Party in the U.S.A.
There are exceptions like the log cabin Republicans that do not overlap with those goals as much but those exceptions are rare and even the log cabin Republicans are subverted