@amerika They deserve no credit for it. That’s a deception to control Christians. Judaism is a cult offshoot of the Torah and laws of Moses, originally observed by the Hebrew people. Christ was not a part of this offshoot that they now call Judaism but was an observer of Hebrew Torah. Christianity was a natural continuation and fulfillment of the Torah and Tanakh underpinnings through the New Covenant while Judaism made a hard left turn into Babylonian Talmud/Kabbalah teaching.
Do not call it the Torah call it the Old Testament
Kikes are very deceptive & intentionally use the word Torah to refer to fictitious oral teachings allegedly from Moses that were not found in the Old Testament
The Mishnah claimed to contain this oral teaching was written after the New Testament
The time gap between the alleged writing of the so called oral teaching & Moses death is greater than the time gap between the writing of the New Testament & Jesus execution
@shortstories @amerika Thank you for the clarification. That makes sense.
Also a very liberal Jew who said he was opposed to what is being done in Palestine told me that Tanakh should not be used in place of the Old Testament because the T in Tanakh stands for Torah
So the Tanakh is not the same as the list of books in the Old Testament in his mind either
Kikes are in a information control cult to avoid information that sounds Christian so groups like Jesus changed vocabulary to make the message sound more acceptable but in doing so...
In the process of changing Christianity to make it more acceptable to Kikes they changed a lot of teachings so that it is no longer compatible with Jesus message
And it to some degree also became Zionist propaganda to promote allegiance to the State of Israel
I think it is good if they get them to reject the Kike religion but bad if they support Zionism in doing so
They also excuse a lot of Kike wrong doings to be more friendly so they listen
Typo
"groups like Jesus changed vocabulary"
groups like Jews for Jesus changed vocabulary
When they changed vocabulary they also happened to change doctrine
A change in vocabulary does not always mean a change in doctrine
But in the way they choose to do it, it did mean a change in doctrine
They do have a good point that maybe it should not be called the Old Testament because it is not out of date
But the problem is we have no other commonly known word to call it in the modern language because the Torah and Tanakh mean different things
And also some of it was only meant to apply to a local government at a specific location during a specific time period where as other parts like not murdering were meant to apply to all times so in that sense it is old.
@shortstories @amerika Yes. Christ said He did not come to destroy the law of Moses but to fulfill it. He fulfilled what the prophets wrote about in the Tanakh, most of which they themselves do not read, especially Isaiah.
Maybe it should be called the Old Covenant because that’s what it actually is. God’s attempt to have a relationship with us through observance of law by a ‘stiffnecked people’. When that didn’t work, a New Covenant had to be implemented which was rejected.