It should be mandatory for all fedi voot posts to include an option of “don’t care, didn’t ask”

Objection. The word "supports" is ambiguous in context. Does he mean materially supports or merely giving one's theoretical agreement with some royal act or position.
Follow

@Humpleupagus @NotoriousDOG

Supporting would be claiming King Charles 3 is not an enemy who is hostile to the the white gentile citizens of the United States

In regards to the question of if it is treason for a person labeled as a United States citizen to support the British Monarchy

· · Web · 1 · 0 · 1

Overruled, all kings are enemies of the whites. Except 1

So a mere oral or written statement?

> Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;

> Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

This nigger invoking the constitution. We need to talk

I’ll allow that argument, what do the women say? Wait don’t speak we know

@Humpleupagus @NotoriousDOG

If a congress person uses their speech to make an allegiance with the British Royal family and support them in a war against Germany that is not in the best interest of the United States than that is providing aid and comfort to the enemy and is treason

Objection. Ambiguous. Fails to state the place where such speech is made, e.g. on the floor of their respective chamber or in public.
Over ruled because I am cool my mother told me so.

@Humpleupagus @NotoriousDOG

No matter where anyone says King Charles 3 is not evil they are providing aid to the enemy in it's psychological warfare operations against United States citizens whether in private or public as a citizen or as a government official

> And for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.

Do you contend that old words matter to anything? These niggers be doing whatever they want. We should have sent them back

@Humpleupagus @NotoriousDOG

If a person says King Charles 3 should not be punished for crimes against humanity then they are making King Charles 3 feel more comfortable and aiding King Charles 3 in psychological warfare against United States citizens

Side bar- look we all know that he is a guilty bitch but the current jew world isn’t going to convict their own. Especially so given that the U.S. is involved (I don’t know why) but their own invitation statute is a portrait of Lucifer so that alone makes this whole argument null

Imagine being the King, but being incapable of selecting the prime minister. Oof.

Nigger flexed and denied my passport renewal though. I guess he has to get his dopamine fix somehow

Fuck. I suppose so.

Please no one send my feed to the Dutch king 😖

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.