It should be mandatory for all fedi voot posts to include an option of “don’t care, didn’t ask”

Objection. The word "supports" is ambiguous in context. Does he mean materially supports or merely giving one's theoretical agreement with some royal act or position.

@Humpleupagus @NotoriousDOG

Supporting would be claiming King Charles 3 is not an enemy who is hostile to the the white gentile citizens of the United States

In regards to the question of if it is treason for a person labeled as a United States citizen to support the British Monarchy

Overruled, all kings are enemies of the whites. Except 1

So a mere oral or written statement?

> Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;

> Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

@Humpleupagus @NotoriousDOG

If a congress person uses their speech to make an allegiance with the British Royal family and support them in a war against Germany that is not in the best interest of the United States than that is providing aid and comfort to the enemy and is treason

Objection. Ambiguous. Fails to state the place where such speech is made, e.g. on the floor of their respective chamber or in public.
Follow

@Humpleupagus @NotoriousDOG

No matter where anyone says King Charles 3 is not evil they are providing aid to the enemy in it's psychological warfare operations against United States citizens whether in private or public as a citizen or as a government official

· · Web · 1 · 0 · 0
> And for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.