A virus is RNA or DNA sorrounded by a shell that is neither RNA nor DNA

The shell could be made up of protein for example

The immune system recognizes the virus from the shell

But if the virus has it's shell removed and it is just RNA or DNA then the immune system can not recognize the virus from the shell

Apparently you can just inject this into someone and the body would start replicating the virus without any immune system to stop it because the mRNA shots caused virus spike production

This is incorrect with several unproven virology theories blended together. Immune systems are oriented to barriers between internal & external.. most of what is classified as viral illness is introduced at eyes, nose & mouth with T-cell response initially later B-cells may add backup defenses. Injecting mRNA is an old lab tool known as TRANSFECTION it's also how all virology is done with CRISPR sequences transfected into cell culture replicated by E.coli or other bacteria then stuffed into rodents to model disease & design vaccines.. it's also known as Gain of Function which is pure clones not a triumph of virology over nature. https://web.archive.org/web/20161206155142/http://www.gryphonscientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Risk-and-Benefit-Analysis-of-Gain-of-Function-Research-Final-Report.pdf

Transfection of ANY and ALL non-self proteins triggers immune systems to destroy the non-self proteins and it made headlines in 1999 when promise of genetic modification to cure disease was shown to be total failure w Biotech Death of Jesse Gelsinger.. turns out even the most benevolent aim can't fool Mother Nature. Spike is irrelevant the body ALWAYS destroys non-self proteins.
https://web.archive.org/web/20080517050534/http://www.nytimes.com/library/magazine/home/19991128mag-stolberg.html
Follow

@PamelaDrew

Doctor who attends synagogue gives gene therapeutic virus at high dose to patient which caused more severe problems than low doses did in other test subjects

Doctor did not gradually raise dose but gave the high dose immediately to the test subject

Test subject died

Doctor said he is worried about being too risk adverse

Doctor goes to Synagogue

Allegations in article

web.archive.org/web/2008051705

· · Web · 1 · 2 · 1
New York Times has always been terribly biased in its science reporting but linking that is confirmation the death hit mainstream.. There's a lot of other investigation and reporting including Congressional hearings.. all try very hard to avoid the idea that humans are limited by biology but instead better tools will make better outcomes... wrong questions useless answers is forever.. claiming dose dependent is a cop out.. the biggest failure doctors copped to was insufficient detail for informed consent.. blog by Jesse's father & followup to rebrand failure as limited success add more detail. WIRED is notorious cheerleader for Bill Gates Biotech Mafia j/s
https://web.archive.org/web/20240920212710/https://guineapigzero.com/jesses-intent/

https://web.archive.org/web/20230607125250/https://www.sciencehistory.org/stories/magazine/the-death-of-jesse-gelsinger-20-years-later/

https://web.archive.org/web/20140407043541/https://www.wired.com/2013/08/the-fall-and-rise-of-gene-therapy-2/
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.