@nomebullyyou So you're asking if freedom is always good? By "good" I assume you mean "good for the collective". It usually depends on how responsible the people are on average, but obviously freedom can also favor the individual over the group.
Anyway, the real question is: is there a good alternative to freedom? If people are too stupid/weak to defend their interests, should humanity give up on freedom?
You seem to be arguing for "racial/religious collectivism".
@nomebullyyou I on the other hand, do not believe a system can (or should) fix people. I believe in natural selection and that chaos (like death) are also desirable.
Death fixes people, it renews the species, which in turn tends to fix the system. It will inevitably collapse again, it's a cycle, but it works.
What you're suggesting delays the collapse by saving the weak, something I'm very much against, as it will either result in a more severe setback for the species, or in transhumanism.
