>NEW: Russian milbloggers claimed that Ukrainian forces continue to advance in Kursk Oblast amid Russian attempts to stabilize the frontline in the area.

How long can they keep this up for? This is wild.

@Bad_Banner I suspect they can't and this report is as fake and gay as everything else the UA releases.

@Bad_Banner I honestly didn't read it. The current state of UA is so attrited, that they've even lasted a week is impressive. They have no mobile AA systems, so RU is demolishing them from above. This last gasp push will do nothing to advance Ukraine's goals other than the PR of having something trending on twitter for a few days.

@RegalBeagle @Bad_Banner ISW has been publishing maps for 3 years now. since the siege of azovstal they have been inaccurate and biased to nato.

they are suing OSINT for the publishing of these maps. OSINT is full of disinfomation. what passes for osint is a uke standing in front of a fake road sign; "omg geolocated ukes took stalingrad"
@Bad_Banner @IAMAL_PHARIUS @RegalBeagle "Something something revenge for Donbass shelling" = Russia is winning
"Slavs killing other Slavs" = Russia is losing

@Spingebill @Bad_Banner @IAMAL_PHARIUS Ignore the shills, but Russia can't lose. No nuclear nation 'loses' a war. If Russia 'loses', their nukes fly, then eveyone's nukes fly and it end in a tie. This is the stated nuclear doctrine of both US and Russia.

Follow

@transgrammaractivist @Bad_Banner @IAMAL_PHARIUS @Spingebill Depends on if you count taking your ball and going home as a loss.

· · Web · 1 · 0 · 0
Well youre the one who said nuclear powers never lose. So are you saying america hasnt lost a war since 1945?

@transgrammaractivist @Bad_Banner @IAMAL_PHARIUS @Spingebill We took our ball and went home. Giving up is not losing. The Taliban, Koreans, Vietnamese, etc were never in a position to dictate terms of surrender. ZOG has painted itself into a corner. They are all in on rebuilding the temple and triggering the apocalypse. We will all get to see how that plays out for them.

So you are saying america hasnt lost a war since 45. What about the soviets in Afghanistan? Was that a loss?

@transgrammaractivist @Bad_Banner @IAMAL_PHARIUS @Spingebill I'll engage one last time, but you're splitting hairs. I define a US loss as the US offering terms of surrender and another state actor accepting them. My position is any nuclear capable nation will never allow another nation to dictate terms of surrender.

Thats an incredibly dumb definition and one thats only used by you. America has lost multiple wars since 1945. Same with the soviets.
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.