How long can they keep this up for? This is wild.
@Bad_Banner I suspect they can't and this report is as fake and gay as everything else the UA releases.
@Bad_Banner I honestly didn't read it. The current state of UA is so attrited, that they've even lasted a week is impressive. They have no mobile AA systems, so RU is demolishing them from above. This last gasp push will do nothing to advance Ukraine's goals other than the PR of having something trending on twitter for a few days.
they are suing OSINT for the publishing of these maps. OSINT is full of disinfomation. what passes for osint is a uke standing in front of a fake road sign; "omg geolocated ukes took stalingrad"
"Slavs killing other Slavs" = Russia is losing
@Spingebill @Bad_Banner @IAMAL_PHARIUS Ignore the shills, but Russia can't lose. No nuclear nation 'loses' a war. If Russia 'loses', their nukes fly, then eveyone's nukes fly and it end in a tie. This is the stated nuclear doctrine of both US and Russia.
its basically the reverse cuba missile crisis.
To ZOG, this is a nothing burger. Europe and Russia will exhaust each other while they get to play debtor and middle man for the next century. A "loss" would mean europe hating russia for another generation, blackrock gets all the spoils and payment for reconstruction of ukraine.
so for america they wont interject themselves into the proxy war too much. Trump will get into office next year, sit down with putin and sell europe. Probably back out of nato too if europe dont sign some unfair treaties to pay USA for "defense".
ID ASSUME SONE SORT OF UNITED NATIONS SUPERVISED DISPOSAL PROGRAM IN RETURN FOR IMF LOANS TO RETARDED SUCCESSOR STATE(S)
LONGER TERM
LIKE DO THEY JUST LET NUKES SIT?
MOUNTAIN STATES AND GREAT LAKES STATES PROBABLY HAVE THE ABILITY TO MAINTAIN THE HARDWARE, BUT IS THAT REALLY WORTH ANYTHING
IF YOU CAN HAVE EM YOU SHOULD KEEP EM
there's big questions about whether the nukes we have maintained by the DoD would function since we're not allowed to test them
worries about the trigger mechanisms degrading over time and the highly enriched 'primary' fuel decomposing, which we don't really have the special reactors going to replace
the eggheads run computer simulations every so often and certify that they are doing an excellent job and the weapon would work if fired, though. Plus you can pull the triggers and at least read the outputs and compare to see if the timing is still good
@Paultron @Bad_Banner @IAMAL_PHARIUS @nugger @Spingebill I sleep better at night knowing our nukes are built by the cheapest contractor. 'Mil spec' is the classic military oxymoron.
Ok, then let's just launch a few at Africa and can it "Global Humanitary Aid".
there will be blue hats on the ground if they try to impose their faggotry anywhere other than CA, NYC and DC.
@caekislove @nugger @Bad_Banner @IAMAL_PHARIUS @Spingebill There's a non-zero chance this is actually true.
@Bad_Banner @IAMAL_PHARIUS @Spingebill A nuclear state backed into existential crisis WILL use everything at their disposal to maintain power. I don't think we'll see controlled demolition of the RF like what happened with the USSR as the cultural and political zeitgeists are completely different. The Cuban missile crisis analogy also explains the theological differences. US used to be a Christian nation, while USSR where atheists, but now the opposite is true for both countries.
@transgrammaractivist @Bad_Banner @IAMAL_PHARIUS @Spingebill Depends on if you count taking your ball and going home as a loss.
@transgrammaractivist @Bad_Banner @IAMAL_PHARIUS @Spingebill We took our ball and went home. Giving up is not losing. The Taliban, Koreans, Vietnamese, etc were never in a position to dictate terms of surrender. ZOG has painted itself into a corner. They are all in on rebuilding the temple and triggering the apocalypse. We will all get to see how that plays out for them.
@transgrammaractivist @Bad_Banner @IAMAL_PHARIUS @Spingebill I'll engage one last time, but you're splitting hairs. I define a US loss as the US offering terms of surrender and another state actor accepting them. My position is any nuclear capable nation will never allow another nation to dictate terms of surrender.
If I recall, he talked about how China and Russia would just "balkanize" into separate regions. Just looking at the Balkans alone, that was catastrophic (even for NATO's image), imagine that but with nukes floating around.