So because this gentleman proposes timescales far in excess of those allowed given an Earth whose existence began ~7537 years ago, it’s abundantly obvious that very significant timeline compression is necessary in order to account for any objectively existing physical anthropological evidence - in order for the model to explain the observed data.
I am, of course, completely confident that it can all fit within such a relatively brief duration - even if I’m unable to explain precisely how with the limited resources at my disposal. That being said, I imagine I’d have far less trouble doing so with the vast resources available in the State University System.
My contention, generally, is that most of these observed human fossil findings correspond to peoples that died rather suddenly and cataclysmically in the Great Flood - which piled later upon layer of mud and sediment upon all humanity over the course of a forty-day period. I believe the observed stratigraphy corresponds to the generally statistically greater ability of higher and more intelligent life to scramble to the top as conditions worsened. Of course this is a statistical reality; as it was a very chaotic period significant shuffling occurred concurrently - which lo and behold is also what we see in the fossil record; and the vast work of physical paleontology is to coordinate with geologists to plausibly explain these very shufflings.
As I do not (nor does anyone else I know) have access to the literal fossil record (merely the processed statistical representation of it), I cannot be expected to explain by myself what took millions of manhours and trillions of dollars-worth to dig, process and catalogue. Nevertheless, I remain confident that - were it my job to command such vast State resources over such a period of time, I could easily explain it within the Byzantine Calendar Timeline every bit as satisfactorily as the current establishment has.
RT: https://poa.st/objects/2db5bd63-d6cc-4a6a-a7e5-553e23ed086b
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @wingedhussar Have you heard of Gunner Heinsohn's research before he passed? (Non-Christian, I believe)
He was researching the stratigraphy of Rome, and found that the layers of destruction indicated that Rome fell quickly, not over centuries. He estimates 300-700 years were added to our timeline.
The Septuagint also has a different timeline from the Masoretic Text (which the Church fathers warned was being altered by the Jews).
@RoninGrey @wingedhussar The Cosmos is evidently about 7537 years old by my reckoning; there could be hijinks somewhere though.
@RoninGrey @wingedhussar Not him specifically; but I am aware of various possible timeline compressions, on a spectrum of plausibility. I don’t claim to know that the current standard is indisputible - lots of possibilities.
I go by the Byzantine Calendar, which follows a particular official Septuagint timeline. I trust it more than the Masoretic (which to me appears to have been manipulated for kabbalistic symbolic reading).