≠

There is nothing wrong with exterminating the lower 95% of humanity by IQ.

There is something wrong with refusing to do it, however.

1+
✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware:
@amerika Or we just let dumb people kill them selfs by there own decisions
1
Techy Dog

@dcc @amerika
"...by there own decisions"

Just going to leave that there.......

0
≠

@TechyDog @dcc

Their decisions, not their decisions -- who cares?

They are untermenschen. Fire up the ovens, wood chippers, plastic shredders, and firing squads.

Time to improve humanity.

The first part is killing the weak.

1
Scubbie

@amerika @TechyDog @dcc Improve humanity to what end,to rule what. The weak will inherit the earth after you create the utopia, over and over history will repeat,cheers

1
≠

@Scubbie @TechyDog @dcc

There is no Utopia.

Funciton includes removal of the weak!

1
Scubbie

@amerika @TechyDog @dcc And function is the key

1
≠

@Scubbie @TechyDog @dcc

Function > Moralism|Ideology

1
Scubbie
Follow

@amerika @TechyDog @dcc I agree the strong built society to protect the weak,because they saw the futility in the strong conquering the strong over and over and wanted too allow the weak a chance to advance society in peace,in doing so they prolonged the strong from conquering the strong over and over again and again advancing Humanity as it was intended

· · Mastodon for iOS · 2 · 0 · 1
≠

@Scubbie @TechyDog @dcc

Turns out the weak run society into the ground. Fear ruled us again.

0
≠

@Scubbie @TechyDog @dcc

I think however that your analysis is basically accurate.

People wanted pacifism because they were afriad of war.

0
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Merovingian Club

A club for red-pilled exiles.

Trending now

Resources

Developers

What is Mastodon?

merovingian.club

More…

v3.5.3 · Privacy policy